Telangana High Court

CRLRC/896/2025 of Dr. Madapati Bheem Kumar Vs Smt. M. Sabitha on 24 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDE WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI CIIEINAL REVISION CASE NO: 896 0F 2025 Criminal Revision filed under Section 438 & 442 of BNSS to set aside orders dated

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDE

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI

CIIEINAL REVISION CASE NO: 896 0F 2025

Criminal Revision filed under Section 438 & 442 of BNSS to set aside orders dated 17110125 in Crl MP No. 492 ot 24 in M.C. No. 2i of 2023 on the file of the Court of the ll Additional District and Session Judge Cum Family Court Medchal-Malkajgiri District at: Medchal Between:

Madapati

Dr.

Di

nagar,

..APPELLANT' RESPONDENT

AND

1. Smt. M. Sabitha, D/o. S Jogaiah, age 48 years, Occ Employee.

2. M. Srinidhi, D/o Dr. M. Bheem Kumar, age 19 years Occ Graduate

3. M. Vaibhav, S/o Dr. M. Bheem Kumar , age 11 years Occ Student.

nts No. 3 is minors under guardianship of Natural Guardian

M. Sabitha)

Respondents No. 1 to 3 are R/o. H.No. 20-l Colony, Quthbullapur, Hyderabad 37.

08, Giri Nagar, Opp IDPL

4. State of Telangana, rep. by P.P. High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

.RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Suspend the order Oated 1711012025 passed in Crl. M.P.No.492 of 2024 in M.C.No.2S ot 2023 on the file of the Court of the ll Additional District and Sessions Judge Cum Family Court, Medchal Malkajgiri District, at Medchal, pending disposal of the above Criminal Revision.

f]

!

Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. D S DIVAKAR

Counsel for the R,:spondents: Ms. MEGHANA ADDLA SUNEEL

(unofficial respondents)

Sri M.Ramachandra Reddy,

Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State.

The Court made the following: ORDER:

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT

HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI

NAL

D:24th

Between:

Dr. Madapati Bheem Kumar

Petitioner

AND

Smt. M. Sabitha and four others

Respondents

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

This Criminal Revision Case is filed by, the petitioner seeking to set aside the impugned order dated 17.10.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.492 of 2024 in M.C.No.25 of 2023 by the learned ll Additional District & Sessions Judge, Medchal- Malkajgiri District at Medchal (for shott, "the learned trial Court"), whereby the petition filed under Section 125(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure was allowed

02. Heard Sri D.S.Divakar, learned counsel for the petitioner; Ms. Meghana Addla Suneel, learned counsel for the unofficial respondents; and Sri M. Ramachandra Reddy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. perused the record.

03. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the learned trial Court, without calling for affidavits of income, assets, ancl liabilities, and without considering the income and financial status of the petitioner, passed the impugned order granting interim maintenance of Rs.30,000/- to the unofficial respondents. He therefore prayed that this Criminal Revision Case be allowed by setting aside the impugned order.

04. Per contra, learned counsel for the unofficial respondents submitted that there is no illegality or irregularity in the order passed by the learned trial Court and prayed for dismissal ,rf the Criminal Revision Case.

05. Having heard the submissions of both sides and considering the fact that the impugned order was passed in the absence of the petitioner herein and without calling for affidavits of assets and liabilities, this Court is of the considered view that the impu.qned order is unsustainable and liable to be set aside. Accordin.qly, the impugned order is set aside. \

06. At this stage, both learned ::.;.:;:,,,: main case i'e' M'c'No.2S 0f 2023- considering the same, the learned triar court is directed to dispose of the main case i.e. M'c'No.2S 0f 2023, as expeditiousry as possibre, preferabry within a period of one (1) month from the date of recei,t of a copy of this prder, in accordance with law, after affording reasonabb opportunity to both sides.

01. Wth the above observations Case is disposed of. As a sequet, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. this Criminal Revision t , I I

t. ._ .-...... -.... Sd/. N.CHANDRA SEKHAR UTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII To, SECTION OFFICER Family Court, Medchat PUCI

1.

2.

3.

4.

5. s PSI(IBA State of Telangana,

HIGH COUF|T DATED ;2411212025

ORDER

CRLRC.N|o.896 of 2025 2fl26 B r {' 1 3 * + D ,q +z SIT,IISSING THE CRIIT,IINAL REVISION CASE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead