Telangana High Court

WP/2795/2010 of The Secretary, Ministry of Rural Development Vs Dr.G.Venugopal on 23 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION NO:2795 OF 2010 Between: 1.

\

[ 348e I

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

WRIT PETITION NO:2795 OF 2010

Between:

1. The Secretary, Ministry of Rural Development, Govt of lndia., Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi i'

2. The National lnstitute of Rural Development (NIRD), Rep.by its Director General, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500030

3. The Registrar & Director (Ad!rn). , .Ittq^.llrtional lnstitute, of Rural Developrient, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500030

...PETITIONERS

AND

Dr.G.Venugopat, S/o.Keshava RgQ{-y Senior Medical Officer (dispensed.Y!li^

J6*i.LI n.aierit oiHouie tto.t4515, RT Vijayanagar colony Hyderabad-500057

...RESPONDENTS

' petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of certiorari, calling for the records relating to order passed by the Hon'ble Central hdministrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench in OA.no.1035/2009 dated 2.2.2010 and quash the same declaring as illegal, contrary to law, rules and regulations of NIRD an Autonomous body of the central Government and to confirm the office order dated 1o.7.2OOg cancelling the extension of term of contract appointment order dated 26.5.2008.

I

I

I

I

,l

i{i

II

MP.

I

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidav t filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order passed in OA.No.1035 dated 2.2.2010 on the file of the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench pending disposal of the writ petition.

l.A. NO: 1OF 2O13(WPMP. NO:41377 OF 2O131

Petit on under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to delete the word 'Criminal' in para 7 (n) of the Affidavit filed in supt)ort of the W.P. No. 2795 of 2012.

:1C)

P.

Petilion under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavil filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased permit the petitioner to bring on record the additional affidavit along with additional material pal)ers.

:1 CtF 201

: 3639 OF

P N

Between:

Dr.G.Venug':pal, S/o.Keshava Reddy Senior Medical Officer (dispensed q![ , service) Re"s,ident of House No.145/5, RT Vijayanagar colony Hyderabad-500057

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENTS

AND

1. The [iecretary, Ministry of Rural Development, Govt of lndia., Krishi Bhavan, New l)elhi

2. The l\lational lnstitute of Rurat Development (NIRD), Rep.by its Director General, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500030

3. The Registrar & Director (Admn) , The National lnstitute, of Rural Development, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500030

... RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim suspension orders passed by this Court in WPMP 3686 of 2010 in Writ Petition 2795 of 2010 and dismiss the Writ Petition as it is devoid of any merit.

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI N.B.SUDARSHAN

Counsel for the Respondents: M/s.D.MADHAV!

The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT

HYDERABAD

HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

HOI.tr,BLE SRI IUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

WRIT PETITroN No.2795 0F 20L0

Date: 23.12.2025

Between:

The Secret.rr\', Ministrv of Rural Development, Govt.of Inrlia, Krishi lJhavan, New Delhi and two others.

.. .. Petitioners

ancl

Dr.G.Ver-ru gopal, s/o. Kcshava Redclv,

Age:53 years, occu:St,nior Merlical C)fiicer (dispensed with sen'ir:e) r/o.FI.No .145 / 3RT, Vijal,a naga r Colony, I lyderabacl.

.... Respondent

ORDEII: (yr llon'bla Sri Jttstit'c P.Smr Koslry)

' When the rnattcr is taken up for hearing, Mr. N.B. Sudarshan, learned coLrnsel for the petitioners submits that, by efflux of time, all the retiral be'neiits lt.rt,c beo'n releasec{ to the respondent-employee, who has also receivecl the entire amounts. He further submits that, in vrew of the fact that the respondent has crossed the age of superanrtuatiotr Iong brack, the' rnatter has since become infructuous

2. [n vi:r,v of the same, the writ petition is dismissecl as infructuous 'fhere shalI be no order as to costs.

I

I

tirl

I

I

;

I

!

I

i

i

I

I

,

l

In view of the matter having become infructuous, the amendment application zride I.A.No.1 of zoTz (wpMp No.41377 of

2013) and miscellaneous apprications pending, if any, sha[ stand closed Sd/.M

ANT

/ffRUE COPYII

SECTION OFFICER

To,

One CC to SRI N.B.SUDARSHAN, Advocate.

One'bC to M/s.D.MADHAVI, Advocate. TOPUCI

' 3.' Two CD Copies

,l^

i

&i. , BSK

J/'PMK

"r

r'

HIGH COURT

DATED)12311212025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

WP.No.2795 of 2010 DISMIS$ING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOLIT COSTS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead