Telangana High Court
WP/2795/2010 of The Secretary, Ministry of Rural Development Vs Dr.G.Venugopal on 23 December 2025
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION NO:2795 OF 2010 Between: 1.
\
[ 348e I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
WRIT PETITION NO:2795 OF 2010
Between:
1. The Secretary, Ministry of Rural Development, Govt of lndia., Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi i'
2. The National lnstitute of Rural Development (NIRD), Rep.by its Director General, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500030
3. The Registrar & Director (Ad!rn). , .Ittq^.llrtional lnstitute, of Rural Developrient, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500030
...PETITIONERS
AND
Dr.G.Venugopat, S/o.Keshava RgQ{-y Senior Medical Officer (dispensed.Y!li^
J6*i.LI n.aierit oiHouie tto.t4515, RT Vijayanagar colony Hyderabad-500057
...RESPONDENTS
' petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of certiorari, calling for the records relating to order passed by the Hon'ble Central hdministrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench in OA.no.1035/2009 dated 2.2.2010 and quash the same declaring as illegal, contrary to law, rules and regulations of NIRD an Autonomous body of the central Government and to confirm the office order dated 1o.7.2OOg cancelling the extension of term of contract appointment order dated 26.5.2008.
I
I
I
I
,l
i{i
II
MP.
I
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidav t filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order passed in OA.No.1035 dated 2.2.2010 on the file of the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench pending disposal of the writ petition.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2O13(WPMP. NO:41377 OF 2O131
Petit on under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to delete the word 'Criminal' in para 7 (n) of the Affidavit filed in supt)ort of the W.P. No. 2795 of 2012.
:1C)
P.
Petilion under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavil filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased permit the petitioner to bring on record the additional affidavit along with additional material pal)ers.
:1 CtF 201
: 3639 OF
P N
Between:
Dr.G.Venug':pal, S/o.Keshava Reddy Senior Medical Officer (dispensed q![ , service) Re"s,ident of House No.145/5, RT Vijayanagar colony Hyderabad-500057
...PETITIONER/RESPONDENTS
AND
1. The [iecretary, Ministry of Rural Development, Govt of lndia., Krishi Bhavan, New l)elhi
2. The l\lational lnstitute of Rurat Development (NIRD), Rep.by its Director General, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500030
3. The Registrar & Director (Admn) , The National lnstitute, of Rural Development, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500030
... RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim suspension orders passed by this Court in WPMP 3686 of 2010 in Writ Petition 2795 of 2010 and dismiss the Writ Petition as it is devoid of any merit.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI N.B.SUDARSHAN
Counsel for the Respondents: M/s.D.MADHAV!
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
HYDERABAD
HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
HOI.tr,BLE SRI IUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
WRIT PETITroN No.2795 0F 20L0
Date: 23.12.2025
Between:
The Secret.rr\', Ministrv of Rural Development, Govt.of Inrlia, Krishi lJhavan, New Delhi and two others.
.. .. Petitioners
ancl
Dr.G.Ver-ru gopal, s/o. Kcshava Redclv,
Age:53 years, occu:St,nior Merlical C)fiicer (dispensed with sen'ir:e) r/o.FI.No .145 / 3RT, Vijal,a naga r Colony, I lyderabacl.
.... Respondent
ORDEII: (yr llon'bla Sri Jttstit'c P.Smr Koslry)
' When the rnattcr is taken up for hearing, Mr. N.B. Sudarshan, learned coLrnsel for the petitioners submits that, by efflux of time, all the retiral be'neiits lt.rt,c beo'n releasec{ to the respondent-employee, who has also receivecl the entire amounts. He further submits that, in vrew of the fact that the respondent has crossed the age of superanrtuatiotr Iong brack, the' rnatter has since become infructuous
2. [n vi:r,v of the same, the writ petition is dismissecl as infructuous 'fhere shalI be no order as to costs.
I
I
tirl
I
I
;
I
!
I
i
i
I
I
,
l
In view of the matter having become infructuous, the amendment application zride I.A.No.1 of zoTz (wpMp No.41377 of
2013) and miscellaneous apprications pending, if any, sha[ stand closed Sd/.M
ANT
/ffRUE COPYII
SECTION OFFICER
To,
One CC to SRI N.B.SUDARSHAN, Advocate.
One'bC to M/s.D.MADHAVI, Advocate. TOPUCI
' 3.' Two CD Copies
,l^
i
&i. , BSK
J/'PMK
"r
r'
HIGH COURT
DATED)12311212025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
WP.No.2795 of 2010 DISMIS$ING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOLIT COSTS