Telangana High Court

CMA/504/2025 of Smt. Ujwala Akunuri, Vs Pavan Vurukuti, on 22 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE HIGH @URT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY crvtL MrscELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 504 OF 2025

[ 34941

IN THE HIGH @URT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

crvtL MrscELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 504 OF 2025

AppealUnder43Rule.lagainstorderstoallowtheCivilMiscellaneous Appeal by Sefting aside the docket order dated 2910812025 passed in lA No.799

of 2o25 in G.W.O.P.No.25 ot 2025 by the Family court-cum-lV Additional District and Sessions Court, SangareddY.

Between:

AND

Smt Uiwala Akunuri. Wo. Pavan Vurukuti' Aged about- 35 years, Occ'

Frivite 'Emptoyee, Wbrking as Associate Director - Business Development'

or. neoAv"s Labbratoriesl R/o H.No.51A, Road No.2, Madhura Nagar'

Beeramguda, Ameenper, Sangareddy dist-502032

...Appellant

Pavan Vurukuti,, S/o. Rambabu Vurukuti, Rl/o- Flat No. 204- 2nd Floor, Aged ,nout SO ,eats. Oec. Private Employee, Sai Akhil Jewels, Sri Sai Balaii Enctave, ilallampet,. PO. Bachuilally, Medchal-Malka;giri. Telangana -

500090.

...Respondent

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to dispense For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, 29.08.2025

passed in l,A. No. 799 ol 2025 in G.W.o.P. No. 25 of 2025, on the file of the !

!

I

I

l

I

l,

I

ri

'

:

Family Court-cum-lV Additional District and Sessions rl )urt, such the Xerox copy of the same.

Sangareddy, as

IA NO 2oF

IA NO: 30F 2025

Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in th. circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High cc r rt may be preased to condone the deray of 19 days in firing the above c.M.A, in r le interest of justice.

Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the )ircumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High cor t may be preased to stay a' further proceedings in respect of the docket ortl rr dated 29.0g.2025

passed in r'A No 799 0f 2025 in G.w.o.p. No. 25 0f 2(i 5, on the fire of the Famiry court-cum-rV Additronar District and sessions )ourt, Sangareddy, pending disposal of the accompanying Civil Miscellaneous l\ ,peal.

Counset for the Appeilant: SRt SUNKARA KALYAN DlLEEt, Counsel for the Respondent: _- The Court made the following: ORDER

)

\

IN THE HIGH COURT F'ORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA

ATHYDERABAI)

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE IC LAIGHMAN

ANI)

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISTINA REDDY

C.M.A.No.504 of 2025

Date:22.12.2025

Between:

Smt.Ujwala Akunuri

...Appellant

And

Pavan Vurukuti

. ..Respondent

JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice Klnkshman)

Heard Sri Sunkara Kalyan Dileep, leamed counsel for the appellant

2.

The present appeal is preferred against docket order dated 29.08.2025 in I.A.No.799 of 2025 in G.W.O.P.No.Z5 of 2025

passed by the IV Additional District Judge, Sangareddy.

3.

Vide aforesaid order, learned trial Court, having dispensed \

I

with notlce to the respor,dent therein (appellant herein), permined the respondent herein, to celebrate his birtMay and his daughter's birthday together as prayed for.

4.

According to the learned counsel for the appetl rnt, the birth day falls or.29.09.2025. Therefore, nothing remains ir the present appeal to adjudicate further.

5.

In the light of the above, this appeal is liable to rc dismissed, and accordingly, dismissed. However, liberty is gr mted to the petitioner to prefer fresh appeal, if so advised.

6.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

ST /- R KARTHIKEYAN

JOINT REGISTRAR

,t'

!9-

SECTION OFFICER

To,

//TRUE COPY//

1. The Family Court-cum-lV Additional Diskict and Sessir ns Court at Sangareddy

2. One CC to SRl. SUNKARA KALYAN DILEEP Advocate [)PUCI

3. Two CD Copies

NVB/ABK

I

HIGH COURT

DATED:2211212025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

CMA.No.504 of 2025 DISMISSING THE CMA C) 2 7 JAN 2U6 Z

i t'sYli: .5:: /' ,:{ HE STA ,l t L0 lrbx

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead