Telangana High Court
CMA/504/2025 of Smt. Ujwala Akunuri, Vs Pavan Vurukuti, on 22 December 2025
THE HIGH @URT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY crvtL MrscELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 504 OF 2025
[ 34941
IN THE HIGH @URT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
crvtL MrscELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 504 OF 2025
AppealUnder43Rule.lagainstorderstoallowtheCivilMiscellaneous Appeal by Sefting aside the docket order dated 2910812025 passed in lA No.799
of 2o25 in G.W.O.P.No.25 ot 2025 by the Family court-cum-lV Additional District and Sessions Court, SangareddY.
Between:
AND
Smt Uiwala Akunuri. Wo. Pavan Vurukuti' Aged about- 35 years, Occ'
Frivite 'Emptoyee, Wbrking as Associate Director - Business Development'
or. neoAv"s Labbratoriesl R/o H.No.51A, Road No.2, Madhura Nagar'
Beeramguda, Ameenper, Sangareddy dist-502032
...Appellant
Pavan Vurukuti,, S/o. Rambabu Vurukuti, Rl/o- Flat No. 204- 2nd Floor, Aged ,nout SO ,eats. Oec. Private Employee, Sai Akhil Jewels, Sri Sai Balaii Enctave, ilallampet,. PO. Bachuilally, Medchal-Malka;giri. Telangana -
500090.
...Respondent
IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to dispense For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, 29.08.2025
passed in l,A. No. 799 ol 2025 in G.W.o.P. No. 25 of 2025, on the file of the !
!
I
I
l
I
l,
I
ri
'
:
Family Court-cum-lV Additional District and Sessions rl )urt, such the Xerox copy of the same.
Sangareddy, as
IA NO 2oF
IA NO: 30F 2025
Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in th. circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High cc r rt may be preased to condone the deray of 19 days in firing the above c.M.A, in r le interest of justice.
Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the )ircumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High cor t may be preased to stay a' further proceedings in respect of the docket ortl rr dated 29.0g.2025
passed in r'A No 799 0f 2025 in G.w.o.p. No. 25 0f 2(i 5, on the fire of the Famiry court-cum-rV Additronar District and sessions )ourt, Sangareddy, pending disposal of the accompanying Civil Miscellaneous l\ ,peal.
Counset for the Appeilant: SRt SUNKARA KALYAN DlLEEt, Counsel for the Respondent: _- The Court made the following: ORDER
)
\
IN THE HIGH COURT F'ORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA
ATHYDERABAI)
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE IC LAIGHMAN
ANI)
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISTINA REDDY
C.M.A.No.504 of 2025
Date:22.12.2025
Between:
Smt.Ujwala Akunuri
...Appellant
And
Pavan Vurukuti
. ..Respondent
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice Klnkshman)
Heard Sri Sunkara Kalyan Dileep, leamed counsel for the appellant
2.
The present appeal is preferred against docket order dated 29.08.2025 in I.A.No.799 of 2025 in G.W.O.P.No.Z5 of 2025
passed by the IV Additional District Judge, Sangareddy.
3.
Vide aforesaid order, learned trial Court, having dispensed \
I
with notlce to the respor,dent therein (appellant herein), permined the respondent herein, to celebrate his birtMay and his daughter's birthday together as prayed for.
4.
According to the learned counsel for the appetl rnt, the birth day falls or.29.09.2025. Therefore, nothing remains ir the present appeal to adjudicate further.
5.
In the light of the above, this appeal is liable to rc dismissed, and accordingly, dismissed. However, liberty is gr mted to the petitioner to prefer fresh appeal, if so advised.
6.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
ST /- R KARTHIKEYAN
JOINT REGISTRAR
,t'
!9-
SECTION OFFICER
To,
//TRUE COPY//
1. The Family Court-cum-lV Additional Diskict and Sessir ns Court at Sangareddy
2. One CC to SRl. SUNKARA KALYAN DILEEP Advocate [)PUCI
3. Two CD Copies
NVB/ABK
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:2211212025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
CMA.No.504 of 2025 DISMISSING THE CMA C) 2 7 JAN 2U6 Z
i t'sYli: .5:: /' ,:{ HE STA ,l t L0 lrbx