Telangana High Court

CRP/3783/2025 of Sri B. Narsing Rao Vs Sri Gaddam Laxmaiah on 19 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3783 OF 2025 Petition under Section 115 of C.P.C against the Order and Decree made in l.A.No.'1150 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3783 OF 2025

Petition under Section 115 of C.P.C against the Order and Decree made in l.A.No.'1150 of 2025 in 1.A.No.710 of 2023 in O.S.No.S9 of 2O20 dated 11.09.2025 on the file of the Court of the Xll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad.

Between:

1. Sri B. Narsing Rao, S/o Late Kotaiah, Aged about 65 Years, Occ. Business, R:/o H. No. 6-6-42911, Sairam Nilayam, Gandhi Nagar, Secunderabad

2. Smt B. Vijayalaxmi, Wo B. Narsing Rao, Aged about 63 Years, Occ.

Business, Fl/o H.No. 6-6-42911, Sairam Nilayam, Gandhi Nagar,

3. Sri. B. Abhishek, S/o B. Narsing Rao, Aged about 38 Years Occ. Business, Rl/o H. No. 6-6-42911, Sairam Nilayam, Gandhi Nagar, Secunderabad

4. Smt B. Neeraja, W/o B. Abhishek, Aged about 34 Years, Occ. Housewife, R/o

H. No. 6-6-429/1, Sairam Nilayam, Gandhi Nagar, Secunderabad

5. Smt P. Priyanka, Wo P. Ashwin Chakravarthy, Aged about 33 Years, Occ.

Housewife, R/o H.No. 6-6-42911, Sairam Nilayam, Gandhi Nagar,

6. Sri P. Ashwin Chakravarthy, S/o P. Jagan Mohan, Aged about 47 Years, Occ.

Business, Fl/o H.No. 6-6-42911, Sairam Nilayam, Gandhi Nagar,

Secunderabad

..,REVISIONAL PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANT NOS.1 TO 6

AND

1. Sri Gaddam Laxmaiah, (Died Per Lrs)

2. G. Pentamma, Wo. Gaddam Laxmaiah Yadav, Aged about 79 Years, Occ.

Housewife,

3. G. Sharada, W/o Late Ayelesh Yadav, Aged about 57 Years, Occ. Household

4. Sri. G. Arvind Yadav, S/o Late Ayelesh Yadav, Aged about 37 Years, Occ.

Business

5. Sri Gaddam Venkatesh Yadav, S/o G. Laxmaiah, Aged about 54 Years, Occ.

Agriculture

6. Sii Gaddam Ramesh Yadav, S/o G. Laxmaiah, Aged about 51 Years Occ.

Agriculture

7. Sri Gaddam Srihari Yadav, S/o G. Laxmaiah, Aged about 46 Years Occ.

Agriculture

B. G. Jaya Lakshmi, D/o G. Laxmaiah, Wo G. Ramesh Yadav, A-ged about 55

Yeard, Occ. House Hold, Rl/o Plot No. 5, Ram Reddy Colony, Seetharampur, Bowenpally, Secunderabad

9. Smt Korivi Laxmi, Wo Sri Korivi Laxman Reddy, Aged about 43 Years, Occ.

Housewife, R/o H. No. 16-10-'163, First Floor, Hyderabad.

10.Nexgen llducationalTrust, A Registered Trust bearing No.23112009, Regd Office at Plot No 80, Shri Sai Plaza, Ayyapa Society, Ivladhapur, Hyderabad to 6 Rep by'its Authorized Signatory 1 1 . Gaddam Papaiah Yadav, S/o Late Gaddam Laxmaiah Yadav, Aged about 62

Years, Occ. Business, Rl/o Plot No 34, Sy. Nos 1 to 4, GL Yadav Nagar, Seetharermpur, New Bowenpally, Secunderabad Cantonment. (Respondent No. 10arrd 11 are formal parties)

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT NOS.7&8

lA NO: 1 OF 20,25

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders dated 11.09.2025 in 1.A.No.1150 of 2025 in 1.A.No.710 of 2023 in O.S.Nc.59 of 2020 passed by the Xll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secundr>rabad in the interest of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioners : SRl. P SUMITRA

Counselfor the Respondent Nos.2&9 : SRI PALANTI LAKSHMAN

The Gourt macle the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT YDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

CRP.No.3783 of 2025

Date:19.12.2025

Between:

Mr.B.Narsing Rao and others

Petitioners

And

Mr.Gaddarn Laxmaiah and others.

Respondents

0BDEB,

Mr.Palanati Lakshman, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2

to 9, submits that the main suit i.e. o.s.No.59 of 2020 itself got dismissed and the subject matter has become infructuous.

2." Accordingly, the civil Revision petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/- A. SRE

ASSISTANT

//TRUE COPY/

SECTION OFFICER

1. The Xll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad'

2. One CC to Sri P.Sumitra, Advocate (OPUC)

3. One CC to Sri P,Lakshman, Advocate (OPUC)

4. Two CD Copies

To,

I

I

1

It

HIGH COIJRT

DATED i1tgl12l2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

GRP.No.3l783 of 2025 Dismissing the C.R.P as lnfructuous. Without costs. ot ?. THE S () () ? 7 TIB ZIJZIJ 2l * *

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead