AS/244/2011 of M. Amruth Reddy Vs S. Senappa on 18 December 2025

t 3300 I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

l.A. No. 1 of 2026

IN

APPEAL SUIT NO: 244OF 2011

Between:

M. Amruth Reddy, S/o M Yella Reddy Aged about 67 years, Occ: Agriuclture, R/o H.No. 2-3451A, Narsingi Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, R.R. District.

...AppellanUPetitioner

AND

1. S. Senappa, S/o Rayappa - died as LR's Respondent No. 2 to 6

2. Smt. Sonti Suvarna, W/o. Late S. Senappa, Aged about 61 years, Occ.

Household, R/o.H.No.3-80, Kokapet, Raiendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

3. Smt. K. Swapna, Wo. K. Suresh, D/o. Late S- Senappa, Aged about 41

.years, Occ. Household, R/0.H.No.19-5, D1-5, Huda Colony, Chanda Nagar'

Hyderabad.

4. Smt. C. Lavanya, Wo. Chatla Chandra Shekar, D/o. Late S. Senappa, Aged about 39 years, Occ. Household, R/o.H.No.2-46, Puppalaguda, Narsingi'

Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

5. Smt. U. Swathi, Wo. U. Praveen Kumar, D/o. Late S. Senappa, Aged about 38 years, Occ. Household, R/o.H-No.2-85, Proddutur, Ranga Reddy District.

6. Sonti Sandeep, S/o. Late S. Senappa, Aged about 35 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H.No.14, Kokapet, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District

...Respondents

Petition under Section 148 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the time for compliance of depositing balance sale consideration as directed by this Court ln Judgment and decree dated 18.12 2025 in A.S. No. 244 ot 2011, by a period of one week, by permitting the petitioner to deposit the s; t te to the credit of the Principal District Judge Ranga Reddy District or pay the srr te to respondent No.2 who rs the wife of the deceased respondent No. 1.

Counsel for the AppellanG: Sri Raja Sreepathi p3s, Senior c(,r nsel representing Sri P Sridhar Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: Sri Kiran Reddy Mallarapu The Court made the following: ORDER

Heard Sri Raja Sreepathi Rao, learned Senior Counsel r presenting Sri P

Sridhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner.

This interlocutory application is filed seeking extension ot lir le for compliance wrth the direction to deposit the balance sale consideration, ir: ordered by this Hon'ble Court in its ludgment daled 18.12.2025 in A.S. No. 244 of 2011, by a period of one week, by permitting the petitioner to deposit the same 1( the credit of the Hon'ble Principal District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, or, in the rlternative, to pay the same to Respondent No. 2, who is the wife of the deceased F espondent No. 1, and to pass appropriate orders.

For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the t r with the direction to deposit the balance sale consideration, as orl in the judgment daled 18.12.2025 in A.S.No.244 of 201'1, is her:

period of one (1) week from today. The petitioner is permitted, wi t to deposit the balance sale consideration to the credit of the Hon't,l Judge, Ranga Reddy District, or, In the alternative, to pay the sr No. 2, being the wife of the deceased respondent No. 1.

Accordingly, this interlocutory application stands allowed re for compliance rred by this Court )y extended by a rn the said period ) Princrpal District ne to respondent SD/- K,\ .O. NARSI BABU

ASSIS.I \NT REGISTRAR

/TTRUE COPY//

To,

1

The Principal District Judge Ranga Reddy Dis TiI iCTION OFFICER

-Z

2. One CC to Sri Pottigari Sridhar Reddy, Advocate IOPUCI

3. One CC to Sri Kiran Reddy Mallarapu, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies

Sa/BA

9-,

U-..-/

\

.;

*_.qP.,r

I

\

HIGH COURT

DATED: O1lO4t20Z6