ITTA/528/2012 of M/S. REGECY CERAMICS LTD., Vs THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX., on 18 December 2025

I

:

i

I

I

i

i

:

I

t 348e 1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAYOF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABIf SRIJUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

INGOME

TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 528OF 2012

lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260A of the lncome Tax Act,1961

against the Order dated 2149-2007 passed in ITA No. 1075/HYD/2003 for the Assessment Year 1999-2003 on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench'B', Hyderabad.

Between:

Nl/S. Regecy Ceramics Ltd.,, N.N.House, Chirag ali Lane, Abids, Hyderabad Rep.

by its Chairman and M.D.m Dr.G.N.Naidu

...Appellant

AND

The Assistant @rnmissioner Of lncome Tax, Circle 2 (4) 5th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad

...Respondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Mr D Balu, counsel representing M/s GKR Associates Counsel forthe Respondent: MsEOKARO SAPNA REDDY

(sENroR sc rNcoME TAx)

The Court made the following: ORDER

I

)

IN THE HIGH COTJRT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT ITYDERABAI)

THE HONOTJRABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AIYD

THE HONOT]RABLE SRI JUSTICE

SUDDALA CHALAPATITI RAO

ITTA.No.528 of 2012

D*ed:1E.12.2025

Betweerr:

IWs. Re1;ency Ceramics Ltd.,

N.N.House, Chirag Ali Lane,

Abids, I{yderabad.

Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director Dr.G.N.Naidu Appellant

AND

The Assistant Commi'ssioner of Income Ta<, Circle 2(4),5th floor, Ayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.

...Respondent

ORDEI!' (per Hon'ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koslty)

M.r.D.Balu, learned counsel for the appellant representing IWs.CKI( Associates, submits that in spite of best efforts, the appellant has not been contacting nor is he traceable and, counsel lbr the appellant pleads no instructions.

i

thgrefore,

learned

(

(

2.

In view of the same, ttris Bench is left with no option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution with liberty to the appellant to revive the same with an appropriate application with justifiable reasons, that too in case ifthe grievance still survives.

3.

The appeal is acrcordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/. MOHD. ISMAIL

DEPUW REGISTRAR

To,

SA/PSL

fv*

,ffRUE COPY/

SECTION OFFICER

1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad. (with Records, if any)

2. One CC to M/s CKR Associates , Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to Ms Bokaro Sapna Reddy (SENIOR SC INCOME TAX) [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies

-

I

\

HIGH COURT

DATED i1811212025

i

,t

2 7 Jtt{ ?026

'itt! s

oo