Telangana High Court
CC/2846/2025 of Sukka Dayanand Vs Navin Mittal, IAS on 18 December 2025
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2846 OF 2025 Contempt Case filed Under Sections 1 0 to '12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 197'1 to punish the
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF DECEIVBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2846 OF 2025
Contempt Case filed Under Sections 1 0 to '12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 197'1 to punish the respondent for his wilful and deliberate violating the Orders of the High Court dated '1 5-09-2025 in W.P.No. 27743 of 2025
Between:
Sukka Dayanand, S/o. S,Chandraiah, aged 49 years, Occ. President, Telangana lvladiga JAC Sangam, Ir/edipally, No.4123, Kranthi Colony, ft/edipally(Post) and (l\/dl),Medchal 500098
...PETITIONER/ Petitioner
AND
1. Navin tVittal, lAS, Principal Secretary, Department Of Energy, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana State.
2. MD.Musharraf Faruqui, lAS, Chairman and Managing Director, Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited (TGSPDCL), 6-1-50, l\ilint Complex, Hyderabad-500063
3. tt/ikkilineni l\/anu Choudary, I.A.S, District Collector, O/o. Dist Collectorate Complex, Medchal Malkajgiri District., Telangana State
4. SIVI Haseena, Mandal Revenue Officer (MRO), O/o. Mandal Revenue Office, tt/edipally Mandal , MedchallValkajgiri District , Telangana State- 500098
5. TSVN Thrilleshwar Rao, lvluncipal Commissioner, Peerzadiguda lVuncipal Corporation, Medchall\4alkajgiri(Dist),Telangana state-500098
...CONTEMNORS/ Respondents
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Rule 1B of Contempt of Case R/w. Sec. I51 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with my personal appearance before the Hon'ble court on 1911212025 in CC No. 2846 oI 2025 in WP No. 27743 of 2025
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. RAMESH SHA,NIGARAM
Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 : GP FOR ENERGY
Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 : SRI N. SREEDHAR REI) )Y, SC FOR
TGSPDCL
Counsel for the Respondent No. 3 TO 5 : Ms. D. HARITHA (IRAN, Asst. G.P.
f rr REVENUE
The Court made the following ORDER:
i^.
IN THE HIGH COURT F.OR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
HYDERABAD
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
CONTEMPT CASE No. 2A46 OF 2O2S
18.r2.2025
Betwee n:
Sukka Davanand
Petitioner
Ancl
N:l'in Mitt:rl,lAS.,
Principa I Scr:re tan',
L)epartmcn t of Energ,
&, forr r othcrs
Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
HcaL-d Sri S. Ramcsh, lcarned counsel for petitioner, Sri N. Srccclhar Redcl1,, lczrrned Stancling Counsel for TGSPDCL and Ms. D- Han[ha Kiran, learned Assistant Government Pleadr-r fcrr Revenue. '2. Complaining violation of the interim order dated
15. O9.2025, petitioner in Writ Petitron No. 27743 of 2025 fited this Contcmpt Case.
3. The 2nd respondent Chairman and Managing Direltor ol TGSPDCL filed counter stating that on production of \ copy of interim order claled 15.O9.2O25, immediate steps were taken by Habsiguda Circle Office of TGSPDCL anrl were issued to the contractor to stop the const' accordir-rgly u'ork s.as stoppcd on 23.O9.2025; no t r being carried oul at present as allcged by pctition. - "'
4. Thc 4(h respondcnt aiso filed count.r' the land has been allotted to TGSPDCL bt,f procedure under the cover of a parlchn:,r r construction ol sub st:rtion is Lrndertaken onl\ allotted
5. This Court today clismissed Writ PLititr- ol 2025 takrng into consideration the counter f l: respondent and also observing that construction ,> is aimed at providing quality porver supplv to the I r iri view of the growing demand for porver supplv r r Medipally Village and pctitioner has not dcmonstl t 1 aggrieved by thc said construction and even it is that this Writ Petition is filed in public inrerest.
6. ln vierv of dismissal of Wnt PetitLo consequential vacation of the interim order datcl disobedience of which is complained by pctitioner no contempt against respondents. lnstructl()ns tr;tion $,ork; rstrlrctiotr is stzrLrng that llou,irrg thc r and the n the land 't Nc>.'27'/43 i b1' thc 2"4 sull station :al rr:sidents ancl arolrnd rd hor,v he is lot his case itself and 15 09.2025 here can be I
The Contempt Case is accordingly, closed The miscellaneous Applications, if any shall stand Sdi- K. AMMAJI DEPUTY REGIS //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER Two CCs to G.P. for Energy, High Court for the Stat Telangana of Telanagana Two CCS to G.P. for Revenue, High Court for the State closed To,
4' Hyderabad oi " cC to SRl. RAIVESH SHANIGARAM, Advocate [OPUC] bne ccs to sRt N. SREEDHAR REDDY, Standing counsel, High court For The State Of Telangana . 5. Two CD Copies ,M- ki-rl/kanr l I ! I i I I i l {
I I HIGH COURT DAfED:.1811212025
ORDER
CC.No.2846 ol 2025 CLOSING THE CONATEMPT CASE ( C'tR
1r- i 6l o (-) I z ,TPfr * o H! t \9 )