ITTA/525/2012 of M/S. REGENCY CERAMICS LTD., Vs THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, HYDERABAD on 18 December 2025

Appeal filed Under Section 260 A of the lncome Tax Act, 1961

aggrieved by the order dated 21 09.2007 in ITA No. 9l1lHydl2Ol4, for the asbessment year 2OO1-02 on the file of the lncome Tix Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench "8", Hyderabad.

[ 348e ]

N.H

G.N

ome Chirag Ali Lane, Abids, Hyderabad

. Naidu.

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 525 OF 2012

Between:

M/S. Regency Ceramics LTD., N

Rep. by its Chairman and M.D., Dr

...Appellant

AND

The lncome Tax Officer, Ward 2(2) Hyderabad.

...Respondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Mr. D. Balu, representing M/s. CKR Associates Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Bokaro Sapna Reddy (Senior SC lncome Tax)

The Court made the following: ORDER

)

\

IN THE IIIGH COTJRT FORTIIE STATE OF TII -ANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE TIONOTJRABLE SRT JUSTTCE P.SAM t OSHY

AND

THE HONOTJRABLE SRI JUSTICE

SI]DDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

ITTA.No.525 oI2Ol2

Dated: 18.12.2025

Between:

M/s.Regency Ceramics Ltd.,

N.N.House, Chirag Ali Lane,

Abids, Hyderabad.

Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director Dr.G.N.Naidu

..Appellant

AND

The lncome 'Iax Officer,

Ward 2(2), Hyderabad.

. Respondent

QBDEB' (per llon'ble Sri Justice P.Sam Ko.shy)

Mr.D.Balu, leamed counsel for the appella r rcprescrlting M/s.CKR Associates, submits that in spite of best eflbrt: the appellant has not been contacting nor is he traceable and. th: ciorc' learned counsel lor the appellant P-leads no instructions.

\

{

2.

In view of the same, this Bench is left with no option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution with liberty to the appellant to revive the same with an appropriate application with justifiable reasons, that too in case if the grievance still survives

3.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed lor want of prosecution There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall staid closed.

SD/- K SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

To,

//TRUE COPY//

SECTI

FFICER

t. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench "B", Hyderabad. (With records)

2. One CC to M/s. CKR Associates [OPUC]

3. One CC to Sri Bokaro Sapna Reddy (Senior SC lncome Tax) [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies

DUPSL

I

HIGH COURT

DATED:.1811212025