ITTA/529/2012 of M/S. REGENCY CERAMICS LTD., Vs THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, HYDERABAD on 18 December 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 529 OF 2012

lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 2604 of the lncome Tax Act,1961

against the order dated 21-09-2007 in lrA No. 897lHydt2oo4 (Asst. year 2ooo-2001)

on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A', Hyderabad.

Between:

M/s. Regency Ceramics Ltd. N.N.House, Chirag Ali Lane., Abids, Hyderabad Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director Dr.G.N.Naidu.

...eppeUeruT

AND

The lncome Tax Officer, tNard 2 (2), Hyderabad

...RESPONDENT

Counsel for the Appellant: SRI D. BALU, REPRESENTING

M/S. CKR ASSOCIATES

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI BOKARO SAPNA REDDY (SENtOR SC

rNcoME TAX)

The Court made the following ORDER:

)

IN THE IIIGH COT]RT FORTHE STATE OF T]] LANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM I OSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE

SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

ITTA.No.529 of 2Ol2

Dated: 18.12.2025

Between:

M/s.Regency Ceramics Ltd.,

N.N.House, Chirag Ati Lane,

Abids, Hyderabad.

Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director Dr.G.N.Naidu

...Appellant

AND

The Income Tax Officer,

Ward2(2), Hyderabad.

. .Respondent

ORDER' (per IIon'ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)

Mr.D.Balu. leamed counsel for the appellarLl representing IWs.CKR Associates, submits that in spite of best efforts the appellant has not been contacting nor is he traceable and, thtr:fore. Ieamed counsel for thc appellant pleads no instructions.

\!-\

+:!(tn

.\

2

2.

In view of the same, this Bench is left with no option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution with liberty to the appellant to revive the same with an appropriate application with justifiable reasons, that too in case if the grievance still survives.

3.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed for want ofprosecution There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closcd //TRUE COPY//

SD/- N SRIHARI

DEPUW REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

To,

W

1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench "B" Hyderabad

2. One CC to M/s. CKR ASSOCIATES, Advocate [OPUC]

3 One CC to SRl. BOKARO SAPNA REDDY (SENIOR SC INCOME

TAX) Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD CoPies

kut/PSL

HIGH COURT

DATEO:181'|212025