Telangana High Court
TREVC/167/2010 of M/S. VINAYAKA STEELS LTD. Vs THE STATE OF A.P. on 17 December 2025
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAilA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO TAX REVtstoN CASE NO: 167 OF 2010 Tax Revision Under Section 34 (1) ( See
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAilA
AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
TAX REVtstoN CASE NO: 167 OF 2010
Tax Revision Under Section 34 (1) ( See Rule 46 ) of AP VAT Act to revise the order dab}d 22-10-2fi)8 in T.A.No. 491 of 2006 0n the file of the Sales Tax Appellate Tiibunal, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
Betweenl
M/s. Vinayaka Steels Ltd., M.G. Road, Secunderabad. ...PETITIONER/ Appellant
AND
The state of A.P. rep. by the state Representative befgr!_Qale9_TslllPpellate Tribunal, HyOerabaO.
..RESPONDENTI Respondent
Counse! for the Petitioner: SRl. A. K. JAISWAL
Counsel for the Respondent:
The Court made the following ORDER:
IN TIIE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELI\ilGANA
AT I{YDERABAD
\
THI HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSIIY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
Tax Revision Case ![o.167 of 2()10
Date of Order z 17.
BEIWEEN:
M/ s.Vinayak€r Steels Limited
Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Andhra Pradesh
...Respondent
ORDER : (per tlon'ble Sri Justice P.SAII KOS,IfY)
when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.A.K. Jaiswal, learned counsel for the petitioner had informed the Court that in spite of best efforts being made by him to contact the petitioner for obtaining instructions in the matter, there is no response from the petitioner.
2. In view of above submission and grven the fact that no instructions are forthcoming from the petitioner so as to enable the learned counst:l for the petitioner to pursue the instalt Tax Revision \
.)
case, this Bench is of the considered opinion that as of now the instant Tax Revision case can be dismissed for want of prosecution.
3'
Accordingly, the Tax Revision Case stands dismissed for want of prosecution. However, libert5r is granted to the petitioner to revive the case in case if need so arises. Interim order granted, if any, shall stand vacated.
4.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shail stand closed.
Sd,. N. SRIHARI,
DEPUW REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
2. One CC to SRl. A K JATSWAL Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two C.D Copies Vr SECTION OFFICER To, kul
I i I HIGH COURT PSKJ & SCRJ DATED=171'1212025 TREVC.No.167 of 201 DISMISSING TTIE TREVC 5o6uL HE
S t li 'i
_) jl$ * * -r I ft-