ITTA/380/2010 of Pinna Nageswara RAo, Vs Commissioner of Income tax, IV (A.P) on 17 December 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

WEDNESDAY THE SEVENTEENIH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 380 0F 2010

lncome tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-A of the lncome tax Act, 1961 , against the Order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench A, Hyderabad in l.T (The Station House Officer, ) A No.149/Hyd/1997 (Block period from 1986-87 to '1996-97) Dated 30.09.2000, preferred against the Order of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome (Assts) Spl. Range-4. Hyderabad dated 28.02.1997

in PAN/GIR No N-705 (Block Period from 01 04 1985 to 02.02.1996).

Between:

Pinna Nageswara RAo,, No 8, Arora Colony. Road No Banjara Htlls,.l-|$Br3llt*a

AND

Commissioner of lncome tax, lV (A.P), Aayakar Bhavan, Basheer Bagh, Hyderabad'

...RESPONDENT

I

I

I

I

I

i

I

/

Counsel for the Appellant : SRl. K.NEERAJA (NOT PRESENT)

Counsel forthe Respondent: SRI SWAROOP OORILLA

(SPL.G.P FOR INCOME rAX)

The Court made the following: JUGMENT

IN THT.] HI(;II COURl'FOR THE S'TA'TE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAT)

l'HE I{oNOUR.\BI-E SRI .IUSI'ICI'] P'SAM KOSHY

ANI)

.I'}II.] TIONOURABLE SRI .IUS'IICE

STIDDALA CHALAPATIII RAO

ITTA.No.3 80 of 2010

Dated: 17. 12.2075

Bc Nt cen :

Pinna Nirgesri ara Rao

. .. Appellant

AND

Comnrissioner of lncome Tax, lV (A.P)

A1'akar Bhavan, Basheerbagh,

Hyderabad.

. . . Respondent

.IIIDCMEN't (lter llon'ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshyl On the previous occasion, there has been no representation on behall of the appellant. Accordingly, we have posted this matter under the caption 'fbr dismissal' today.

2.

It appears that pending the appeal before this Cou(, the appeilar.rr has Iosr interest in the said litigation and that is why they are not keen to pursue the same.

I

3.

Today also, in spite ofrepeat calls, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Accordingly, we are left wirh no option, bLrt to disrniss the appeal lor want ol prosecution.

4.

The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed fbr want of prosecution. Interim stay gr.anted earlier, if any, stands vacated.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

I. The Registrar, lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench A, Hyderabad

l. The Deputy Commissioner of lncome (Assts) Spl.Range-4, Hyderabad

3. One CC to Smt K.Neeraja , Advocate (OPUC)

4. Two CCs to the Swaroop Oorilla, Spl.G.P for lncome Tax, High Court for the State of Telangana [OUT].

5. Two CD Copies

Ks/PSL

VV

To,

l\

HIGH COURT

DATED:1711212025

R

o

n

(

*...oF.

-:i..'

E

T

/l r

r t4

()

:_)

iir-

?r

*

o