Telangana High Court

WP/5927/2010 of ADDEPALLI SRIDHAR LAXMAN, HYD Vs GREATER HYDERABAD MUNICIPAL CORP. HYD AND ANO on 17 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Between: AND Addeoalli Sridhar Laxman, S/o. A . Chennakesava,.Aged about.3g years, occ:'d;i;ffi ni6. dit+ squaie' Madtrapgr Main Road, Hvderabad' ...PETITIONER 1 . Greater Hyderabad Municipal @rporation, rep' by its Chief Commissioner' Tank Bund; HYderabad 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Circle - Xl,

[ 348e 1

Between:

AND

Addeoalli Sridhar Laxman, S/o. A. Chennakesava,.Aged about.3g years, occ:

'd;i;ffi ni6. dit+ squaie' Madtrapgr Main Road, Hvderabad'

...PETITIONER

1 . Greater Hyderabad Municipal @rporation, rep' by its Chief Commissioner'

Tank Bund; HYderabad

2. The Deputy Commissioner, Circle - Xl, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, HYderabad IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)

WEDI{ESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry F|VE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

WRIT PETITION NOt5927 oF 2010

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the ffidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to ii6ue writ, order or direction more call one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus ecla ng the emand ng o 8026 se on the petitioner in resPect of Premises No. 1-907/B/S, GuttalabegumpeGSl '

Serilingampally, Ranga ReddY District, as illegal, arbitrary and violate of principles of natural justice and against the procedure contemplated under Hyderabad Municipal Corporation act.

l.A. NO:1 OF

NO

o

PetitionunderSectionlslcPcprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petitkrn, the High Court may be pleased suspend the demand notice l'lo. 18OX)I2OO9-2O10 issued by the Respondents demanding Rs. 2,29,252t- towards property tax in respect of house in premises NO1-907/B/S,Guttalabegumpet-Sl,Serilingampally'RangaReddyDistrictand furtherdirecttherespondentstoreceivethetaxofRs.26.2Tgl-asannualtaxas per the original assessment, pending disposal of the main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. GOPAL DAS.

Gounsel for the Respondents: SRI M.A.K. MUKHEED (SC FOR GHMC)

The Court made the following: ORDER

a

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR TIIE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOT'RABLE SRI JUSTICE

SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

Writ Petition No.5927 of 2010

Dated: 17.12.20?5

Between:

Addepalli Sridhar Laxman

...Petitioner

AND

Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep.by its Chief Commissioner, Tank Bund, Hyderabad and another.

I

Respondents

ORDER: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice P'Sam Koshy)

on the previous occasion, there has been no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Accordingly, we have posted this matter under the caption 'for dismissal' today'

2.

[t appears that pending the writ petition before this court, the petitioner has lost interest in the said litigation and that is why they are not keen to Pursue the same'

\

I

\

,,p*r*"Uon

on beha'f of the petitioner. Accordingry, w" are Ieft with no option, but to dismiss the writ petition for want ofprosecution.

-r%v''

4.

The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecuti,ln. Interim stay granted earlier shnds yacated. There shall be n,l order as to costs.

consequentry' misce'aneous petitions pending, if any, sharl stand closed.

\

SD/.A.H.S.

//TRUE COPYII

OFFTCER

To,

i i#i fffjrfl [.fff$,,5#n ti.s ii:i,r**r BN

BS

SF

loPUCl

Telang'anatOUTI

..-....??:.r++"i-6{,

_ ___ .. . .

I

I

I

I

d

HIGH COURT

DATED:1711212025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

WP.No .11927 of 2010 t or r, $$ t$ DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION $q*rlf;+r. :..... . - .... @,= 7L<- ol - aP. qtr :i ts.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead