Telangana High Court
TREVC/124/2010 of THE STATE OF A.P. Vs M/S. ASWINI HOMEO PHARMACY, HYD. on 15 December 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO TAX REVISION CASE NO: 124 OF 2010 Tax Revision Case under Section 22(1)
\
[ 348e I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
TAX REVISION CASE NO: 124 OF 2010
Tax Revision Case under Section 22(1) ot APGST ACT Read with Rule 40 of APGST Rules to revise the order dated 01.12.2008 passed in T.A.No.57812003 on the file of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
Between:
The State of Andhra Pradesh ,Representative by the State Representative before STAT., D. No. 5-4-404 to 408, Namapally, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
M/S. Aswini Homeo Pharmacy, Hyderabad, 5-288, Vajra House, Moosapet (R.R.
Dist.)
...RESPONDENT
Gounsel for the Petitioner : Mr. T. Chaitanya Kiran Assistant Government Pleader representing Mr. Swaroopa Oorilla Special Government Pleader for State Tax Counsel forthe Respondent: - The Court delivered the following:
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICB P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRT JUSTICB -
SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
Tax Revision Case No.124 of 2010
Dated: 15.12.2025
Between:
The State of Andhra Pradesh,
Rep. by the litate Representative before STAT, D.No.5-4-404 to 408, Nampally, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
Petitioner
AND
M/s.Aswini l{omeo Pharmacy,
#5-28& Vajra House, HP Road,
Moosapet, Hyderabad.
Respondent
JUDGMEN'I: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)
Heard Mr.T.Chaitanya Kiran, learned Assistant Govemment Pleader representing Mr.Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Standing Counsel for the State Tax for the petitioner.
Perused the record
-----'-'-
2.
The challenge in this tax revision case is to the order dated 01.12.2008 passed by the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad in T.A.No.578 of 2003.
3.
The point f,or consideration before this Court is as to whether the product from the respondent organization viz., Aswini Hair Oil is a medicated product or not and whether the same would fall within the purview of Entry 37 of the First Schedule as a drug or whether it would go under Entry 36 as a cosmetic.
4.
Perusal of the record would go to show that the Tribunal while deciding the said issue was swayed away by the judgment of this very High Court in Special Appeal Nos.8 and 10 of 2000
decided on 12.04.2007 wherein the High Court dealing with the issue whether it would be a product under Entry 36 or Entry 37 of the First Schedule to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act (for short 'the Act') relying upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in B.P.L Pharmaceuticals Liruited vs. Collector of Central Excise, Vadodara repofted in 104 STC 164 and another decision of the Sqp1qgtg Court tn Comntissianer of Venfi'al Excise vs.
:
;,.:
:
:
,*
a
I
Sharmu Cthemical lltorks reported in 132 STC 251 held that \
Aswani Homeo Hair Oil is a drug and is taxable under Entry 37
of First Schedule to the Act and would not fall under Entry 36.
5.
Thert: has been no material to show that the judgment rendered b),this Court in Special Appeal Nos.8 and l0 of 2000
having beerr reversed subsequently to hold that the view taken by the Tribunal relying upon the High Couft's order to be incorrect.
Moreover, rve are also not inclined to interfere with the order for the reason that the issue already stands decided by this Fligh Curt again in a batch of tax revision cases of similar nature in TREVC Nc,s.155 of 2004 and batch decided on 14.06.2024 and also in TREVC No.66 of 2009 dated 17.02.2025.
6.
Given the aforesaid judicial precedents rendered in the recent past and also those which have been relied upon by the Tribunal while passing the impugned order, we do not find any merits in thr: question of law raised by the State.
7.
The tax revision case, being devoid of merits, fails and is, accordingly, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY/
SD/- A.V.S.S.C.S.M.SARMA
JOINT REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
To,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad' (With records , if anY)
2. The nppettal6d Deputy Commissioner, Comercial Tax Department' Hyderabad Rural Division, Hyderabad'
3. The CominercialTax Officer, UyOeraOad' H'gdevranov
4. Two CCs to the Mr. Swaroopa Oorilla Special Government Pleader' State of Telangana, High court Buildings, at Hyderabad (oUT)
5. Two CD CoPies DL/psl YK
.,/ HIGH COLIRT DATED:1511212025 JUDGMEhIT TREVC.NcI.124 ot 2010 DISMISSITIG THE TAX REVISION CASE de X" s 09 ttB tu6 ,)t' *: * %