Telangana High Court
CRLRC/942/2025 of Angam Venkata Pinakani Prabhas, Vs State of Telangana on 12 December 2025
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON' BLE SMT JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:942OF 2025 Revision Case under Sections 438 and 442 BNSS against the order dated 10-11-2025
13257 l
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON' BLE SMT JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:942OF 2025
Revision Case under Sections 438 and 442 BNSS against the order dated 10-11-2025 passedinCd.M.P.No.362 of 2024in M.C.No.30 of 2024on thefileof the Court of the Judge, Family Court, Ranga Reddy District at Kukatpally.
Between:
'1. Angam Venkata Pinakani Prabhas, S/o. Angam Srikanth. Aged about 9 years, Occ. Student,
2. Angam Venkata Jeswitha, D/o. Angam Srikanth. Aged about 8 years, Occ Student, Both being minors are represented by their mother and natural guardian Mrs
Y. Venkata Shilpa Kalyani, W/o. Angam Srikanth. Age: 35 years, Occ: Pvt.
Service, No. U7, Girija Residency. Rala Raleshwari Nagar, Raghavendra Colony, Kondapur-500084.
...Petitioner/Petitioner
AND
1. State of TELANGANA, Rep through the Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad.
2. Angam Srikanth, S/o. A. Venkateshwarlu. Age. 40 years, Occ, Software Employee, Fl/o. H.No.8-20-80/3, Ganesh Nagar. Giddalur. Prakasam, Andhra Pradesh-523357
... Respondents/Res pondents
Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petation. the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to pay all arrears forthwith as granted in Crl.M.P.No.362 oi 2024 in MC.No.3O of 2024 on the file of the Judge, Family Court Ranga Reddy District, at Kukkatpally pending dtsposal of the above Criminal Revision Case.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri N.V. Anantha Krishna Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : Sri M. Ramachandra Reddy, Additional Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Respondent No.2: None Appeared The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.942OF 2025
DATED: 12th DECEMBER, 2025
Between:
Angam Venkata Pinakani Prabhas
. Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana rep by Public Prosecutor and another
...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioners passed in Crl.M.P.No.362 of 2024 in [/.C.No.30 of 2024 by the learned Judge, Family Court, Rangareddy District at Kukatpally interim maintenance.
02. Heard Sri N.V.Anantha Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri l\i{.Ramachandra Reddy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. seeking modification of the impugned order dated 1O.11.2025 (for short, "the learned trial Court"), by enhancement of the
03. During the course of submissions, the learned counsel for the petitioners contended that while granting interim maintenance, the learned trial Court failed to take into consideration the fact that the petitioner No.1 is a special child requiring continuous and substantial medical expenses, and erroneously fixed the interim maintenance treating him as a normal child. He further submitted that the respondent No.2 did not disclose his monthly income in the affidavit of assets and liabilities and left Column (F-3) blank. Therefore, while restricting his prayer, learned counsel sought a direction to the learned trial Court for expeditious disposal of the main case, i e M.C.No.30 of 2024 04 Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State reported no oblection to issuing a direction to the learned trial Court for expeditious disposal of the main case, i.e. M.C.No.30 of 2024
05. ln view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, and considering the fact that the main case, ie. tr4 C No 30 of 2024 pertains to the year 2024, the learned trial Court is directed to dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order, in accordance with law, keeping in mind the status of the special child and the monthly income of the respondent No.2. lt is needless to state that the respondent No.2 shall continue to pay the interim maintenance as granted by the learned trial Court until disposal of the main case.
06. With the above observations, this Criminal Revision As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed To, //TRUE COPY// SD/- N SRIHARI DEPUTY REGISTRAR CTION OFFICER ka lly te of Telangana at
1. The Judge. Family Court, Ranga Reddy District at
2. Two CCi to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for Hyderabad. [OUT] r - 3. One CC to Sri N.V. Anantha Krishna, Advocate [OPUC] iW 4 rwo CD Copies ' Karni PSI Case is disposed of.
HIGH COURT DATED:1211212025
ORDER
CRLRC.No.942 of 2025 DISPOSING THE CRLRC ?4 JrN 2026 2 C) i JI/t L. ta ll' '' i @ ')) Y/ l/> i\