CRP/4497/2025 of S. Tirupathi Vs Kyama Venkata Swamy on 12 December 2025

1. Kyama Venkata Swamy, S/o Kyama Narayana, Aged 41 years, Occ- Business, R/o H.No.1-41 , Karivena, Boothpur Mandal. Karvena, Mahabubnagar, Telangana, Presently residing at H.No-24-370, Chandragiri Nagar, NTR Nagar, Near Shivalayam Temple, Gajularamaram, Medchal- tvlalkajgiri District.

2. Ivladuka Kurumurthy, S/o M.Gouraiah, Aged 50 years, Occ- Private Employee. Rl/o H.No.5-24-37'1. Chandragiri Nagar, Near Shivalayam Temple, Gajularamaram, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. 3, Manne Umesh, S/o Late M.Narayana. Aged 50 years, Occ- Business, Fl/o H.No.24-370, Chandragiri Nagar. Near Shivalayam Temple, Gajularamaram. lvledchal-tVlalkajgiri District.

4. M.Sunitha, w/o Late M.Ramesh, Aged 37 years, Occ- Housewife. Rl/o H.No.1- 3, Toopran Village and Mandal. Medak District. (Respondents No.2 to 4 herein not necessary parties) ...RESPONDENTS

lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the citr umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Suspend the Order, dated 1B/10/2025 passed in l.A.No. 3zl of 2025 in O.S.No 338 of 2025 on the file of Additional Senior Civil Judg,: 14s665a1-tValkajgiri District at Medchal. Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. V POORNASRI Counsel forthe Respondents: BANDI SAI VAMSHI FOR Rl The Court made the following: ORDER

i1 t. IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT: HYDERABAD HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CIVTL REVISION PETITION No.4497 OF 202s DATE:12-12-2025 Between Mr. S. Tirupathi Vs Mr. Klama Venkata Srvamv & others l'his Court made the fbllowing: ORAL ORI)ER: Petitioner - Dcfcndant No.,l .. Respondents - I'laintit'l'& Dclcndants llcard Mr. Papaiah Peddakula, leamed counsel represenring Ms. V. Poornasri, ieamed counsel for the petitioner herein - delcnclunr No.4 antl i\,1r. Bancii Sai Vamshi, learned counsel lor respondenl No_ I

- plainti ll. Respondent Nos.2 to 4 are not necessary pat-tics.

2. Respondent No.I herein has filed a suit in O.S. No.3i8 ol' 2025 against the petitioner helein and respondent Nos.2 to 4 herein tbr specific pcrlbrmance of agreement of sale and consequential injunction. Along with the said suit, he has also filed an Irrtcr locurur r Application t'ide 348 ol 2025 seeking temporary injunction. I,'itla ordcr datcd 18.10.2025. the learned Additional Seniol Civil Judg... Medchal - Malkajgiri District at Medchal, granted ex partc a.l intat inl injunction and posted the said I.A. to 03.11.2025. {, rallenging the said order, the pctitioner filed the present revision conL' nding that the trial Court has not recorded the three (03) essential in1 redients rvhile granting ad interim injunction while dispensing wit I notice to the petitioner and other defcndants i.c., primo .facie cl': c, balance ol convenience and irreparable loss

3. With regard to maintainability o[the present r:vision, he has cited two judgrnents of this Court in Bangla Shr kar v. Balla Shankaraiahr and the Madras tligh Court at Madurai I ench in Latha Ilangovan v. Usha Rajaram2.

4. Perusal ol the irnpugncd order would revc; that the trial Court passcd an od interim iniunction observing that hc trial Court has perused the material papers, affidavit, petition do< r tnents filed in support thereol'and granted acl inlerim injunction. Thr: tl'ial Court has posted the said I.A. ro 03.1 1.2025

5. It is apt to notc that the trial Courl can d i ; rcnse with the notice to the respondcnt u'hile granting an ad interint it Ltttction order, in which event learned trial Court has to dispo:;, ol' the said

r. C.R.P. No.3l95 ol20l4. dccided on I L09.2025

2. c.R.P.(MD)No.tl6loil0t9&clvlt,(iut))No.7it9of 20tg.decidedor l-.092019 KL,J CRP No 4a97 of2021 \

I/i t,'

KI,,J CRP No 4497 of2025 interlocutory application within thifty (30) days in terms of Order - XXXX, Rule - 3A of CPC. Though the petitioner filed the present revision under Article - 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the impugned order dated 18.10.2025 passed by the trial Court, he is restricting the relief to a direction to the leamed trial Court to dispose of the said I.A. in terms of Order - XXXIX, Rule - 3A of CPC.

6. In the tight of the aforesaid discussion, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of directing the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Medchal - Malkajgiri District at Medchal, to dispose of I.A. No.348 of 2025 in O.S. No.i38 of 2025 within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt oIcopy of this order. Liberty is granted to the petitioner herein to file an advanceurent petition to advance the said I.A. atong with counter immediateil,. In the circurnstances of the cases, there shall be no order as to cosls. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the revision shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/- T.SRINIVAS REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SEC FICER / J

1. The Additional Senior Civil Judge, Medchal-Malkajgiri, Medcha, Medchal- Malkajgiri District.

2. One CC to SRl. V POORNASRI Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to SRl. BANDI SAI VAMSHI Advocate [OPUCI To,

/

4. Two CD Copies PK/PSL +g I I II

) HIGH COURT DATED:1 2l,1212025 CRP.No.4497 ot 2025 ? i A}l 2[26 a t. \. ,\ SIA ( i o ,( <)t :--r'' ,/ CIVIL REVISION PEITITION IS DISPOSED OI . %\