Telangana High Court
CC/2740/2025 of V. Venkat Reddy, Vs Sri Karnati Varun Reddy, I.A.S. on 12 December 2025
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA C.C.No. 2709 of 2025 : . Contempt case filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act topunish the respondent herein for
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
C.C.No. 2709 of 2025 :
. Contempt case filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent herein for -willfutly disobeying delibeiately/violating the orders of the High court dated 14-02-2025 in w.p.No.ioggt of 201'9.
Between:
aND
1 S.,!;'flnfilff fi,.}f,I#jti Xt.i se years, R/o H No 6-24-4e, Vidyanasar
2. V..chaitany.a Kumar, s/o V. Venkaiah, qg.ed a0 years, R/o H. No. 4-2311, satapoor village, Renjal Mandat, Bodhan, t{izimiuid - sb3 235. -
3. N. chandra Mohan, s/o N. Jagan,..aged.3Q y_ears, R/o. H. No.6-555, Bhramapuri, Near chakram Temp-re, wizimioio -ios oor.
-
4 A:ii: Ttr;l:i'b*r:;:ila:,,1'r%'-,u6?,i:'rR/o H No 8-85, Renjar vi*ase,
5. shahabuddin, s/o Peer Mohammed. Neq ll years, R/o. H. No. 9-17-446, Hashmi colony, Near Malapally pila sch"ooi, Nizimioao - sos 091. -
3a,1tJ#tfr?i l,XlfiLil"; 3;E[] ijli i,Y,',ffi U "?,',ig jg #:l' Ha Eo l "
1 o -2-
... Contempt Petitioner/ petitioner _ 3,6-g, i0 &13
1- sri Karnati varun Reddy r.A.s., chairman and Managing Director The Tetangana state Northerri power o-istiiouiion co. Lil::'t";;;"rfte office at Vidyuth Bhavan, Nakkalagutta, Hanamkonda, Wiianiii u,65'i'6i.trict - s06
o02
2. sri R. Ravinder, fnq Qypprintendent Englnegr (operation circte) T.s.
NPDCL,NizamabadCirbleNizamabao5istrict\-|.--.-.
Respondents/ Respondent Nos. l & 2
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pf"r.LO to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petiiioners ,r pur trre refiesentations and documents submitted on dt. 24.02.2025, d1.25.O2.2025 and 01.03.2025
pursuant to the Orders passed in W.P.No. 16991 of 2019, dt.14.02.2025, in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the main Contempt Case.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. VEMULA SURESH
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI c. VIDYASAGAR, SENIOR COUNSEL- CUM-GOVT. PLEADER
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2740 OF 2025
Contempt case filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent herein for willfully disobeying deliberately/violating the orders of the High Court daled 14-02-2025 in W.P.No.23947 ol 2020.
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. V. Venkat Reddy, S/o Raji Reddy, Age.45 years, Occ. Unemployee Rl/o Gonpur village, Saidapur Mandal, Karimnagar District - 505 472
2. S. Srinivas, S/o Rajaiah, Age. 43 years, Occ. un-employee, R/o Kanagarthi village Ellantha KuntaMandal (Jammikunta) Karimnagar District - 505 472.
3. M. Praveen Kumar, S/o Rajaiah Age.38 years, Occ. Un-employee R/o. H. No. 2-66, Kothapally village, Jammikunta Mandal, Karimnagar Dist.
4. S. Laxminal?y9la, s/o Kanakaiah, Age. 45 years, Occ. un- employee R/o. H. No. 19-83, SW Colony, Huzurabad village arid Mandal KarimnalaiOistrict
5. G. Srinivas, s/o Laxmaiah Age. 42 years, Occ. Un-enployee Rt/o H. No. 1- 11'l18, Kesavapatnam Shankarapatnam Mandal, Karimnagir Dist.
6. K. Dayakar, Sio Venkateswarlu, Age.45 years, 0cc. un-employee R/o H. No. 1-1 12, Rangapur village, Huzurabad Mandal, Karimnagar Dist. '
7. G. Srinivas, s/o Komuraiah Age.44 years, Occ. Un-employee, RlO. h. No. 15- 88, Rajapally village Huzurabad Mandal. Karimnagar Dist.'
8. L. Ravinder, s/o Veerachary, Age. 45 years, Occ. Un-employee, R/o H. No. 9- 66, Damera village and post. Elkathurthy Mandal, Warangal Urban District.
9. l. purgs! Kumar, s/o Komaraiah, Age. 39 years, Occ. Un-employee, R/o H.No. 3-7511, Vallabh Nagar Village Elkathdrthy Mandal, Warangil Urban District
10. Ch. Raghupathi, s/o Rajireddy Age. 43 years, Occ. Un-employee, Rl/o. H. No. 2-89l3, Dharmarajpally village Huzurabad Mandal, Karimnagai Dist.
11. M. Ramakrishna Reddy, s/o Rqm Mohan Reddy, Age. 36 years, Occ. un- gmploye-e-R/o. H. No. 26-1-46, Railway Station Road-Bellampally viilage and Mandal, Mancherial Dist.
12. G. -Nars-imh-a !a!q, S/g D_urgqia! Age. 40 years, Occ. Un-employee, R/o H. No. 2-1-8211, Kannala Basthi Bellampally village and Mandal,'Mincheriai Dist.
13. P. Kumar, S/o Cheralu Age. 44 years, Occ. Un-employee, R/o H. No. 13-212518, SC Colony, Kamalapur village and Mandal, Warahgal Urban Dist.
14. Mohammed Khan, s/o Qahadur Khan, Age. 35 years, Occ. Unemployee R/o. H. No. 4-99, Luxettipet V and Mandal. Mancherial District.
15. M.A. QHAYUM Ali, S/0 Sadath Ali, Age.38 years, Occ. un-employees R/o. H. No. 9-94, Luxettipet Vand Mandal, Mancherial Dist.
16. Vadkapuram Swamy, s/o Rajaiah, Age. 39 years, Occ. un-employee, R/o. H. No. 2-7, Thallapally village, Mandal;Dist. Mancheria, Telangana State lT.Thokala Kistaiah, s/o. Rajaiah, Age.39 years,0cc. Unemployee, R/o, H. No. 12-103, Teegalapahad, Mandal. Naspur, Dist. Mancherial, Telangana State. lS.Mohammed Rafeeque,, s/o Raj Mohammed Age. 45 years, Occ. Un- employee R/o H. No. 16-8-107, Godeavarikhani village Ramagundam Mandal, Karimnagar Dist.
19. G. Ramesh, S/o Venkataiah, Age.41 years, Occ. Un-employee R/o. Baopet village, Elkathurthy Mandal, Warangal Urban District.
20. Bhukya Suresh, S/o Bhukya Tejya, Age. 35 years, Occ. Un-employee, R/o. H. No. 20-4-19, Ashok Nagar, Bellampally village S. Mandal, Mancherial Dist. 2l.Errolla Papaiah, S/o. Ailaiah Age.41 years,0cc. Unemployee R/o H.No. 5-104, Suraram Village Elkathurthy Mandal, Warangal Urban District. ...CONTEMPT PETITIONER/PETITIONER AND
Sri Karnati Varun Reddy, l.A.S., Chairman and Managing Director The Telangana State Northern Power Distribution Co. Ltd., Corporate Office at Vidyuth Bhavan, Nakkalagutta, Hanamkonda, Warangal Urban District - 506 o02 Sri Meka Ramesh Babu, The Superintendent Engineer (Operation Circle) T.S. N PDC L, C i rcle Karim nagar, Karimnagar District. .. Respondents/ Respondent Nos. 1 -2
lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners as per the representations and documents submitted on dt.22.02.2o25, dt. 25.02.2025 and 03.03.2025 pursuant to the Orders passed in W.P.No. 23947 of 2020, d1.14.02.2025, in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the main Contempt Case. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. VEMULA SURESH Counsel for the Respondents: SRI G. VIDYASAGAR, SENIOR COUNSEL CUM GOVT. PLEADER SRI G. VIDYASAGAR The Court made the fotlowing COMMON ORDER:
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRt JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Between G.Sridhar, S/o.G. Ramulu, R/o.Nizamabad & 5 others. AND AND Sri Karnati Varun Reddy, Chairman & Managing Director of TSNPDCL, Hanamkonda, Warangal Urban District & another. Between: !.Ve1kat Reddy, S/o.Raji Reddy, R/o.Karimnagar District & 20 ot-Gr" Petitioners Respondents Petitioners Respondents Sri Karnati Varun Reddy, Chairman & Managing Director of TSNPDCL, Hanamkonda, Warangal Urban District & another. g -s.
l
1. These Contempt Cases are filed alleging that the respondents have not complied with the common order dated 14.02.202s passed in W.P.Nos.16987, 16991 , 20494, 20588, 20629, 22A29, 23035 of 2019; 21017 and 23941 ot 2O2O; 2461, 3892, 22608, 24037 and 25244 ot 2021.
when the matter is taken up for hearing, rearned senior counsel-cum- Government Pleader- Mr. G.Vidyasagar, appearing for the respondents, vehemently opposed the contempt cases contending that the Contempt Cases are not maintainable as the petitioners have only filed Aadhar card, secondary school Certificates and Transfer Certificate and they have not filed the Experience certificate, which is required for consideration.
3. Adverting to the submission made by the learned senior counsel, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that candidates without experience were atso considered and that the petitioners would file the relevant documents and the respohdent-authority may be directed to reconsider the candidature of the petitioners.
4. considering the respective submissions, the lpetitioners are permitted to file relevant certificates and in the event of fiting such certificates, the respondent Authorities shall consider the same on ---\ I I I I I ,t' 'l
.--tiEiqi:i :
humanitarian grounds within two weeks from the date of fiting the certificates.
5. Accordingly, the contempt cases are crosed with the above direction.
6. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shail stand closed. SD'- MOHD.ISMAIL DEPUTY s ON OFFICER /TRUE COPY// To,
1. One CC to SRl. VEMULA SURESH ,Advocate IOPUC]
2. One CC to Sri G. VIDYA SAGAR, Advocate (OPUC)
3. Two CD Copies kul/ABK I i
t I HIGH COURT DATED:1 211212025
COMMON ORDER
CC.Nos.2709 AND 2140 of 2025 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASES 7'. 20 rrc tffi ,+ '.i Arj:lT't-l la