WP/37437/2025 of B. Balamukund Rao Vs The High Court for the State of Telangana on 11 December 2025

[ 348e 1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

WRIT PETITION NO:3743 7 0F 2025

Between:

AND

fl .pal-alqt1qnd_Rao, S/o. LateVishwanath Rao, Aged about 65 years, Rl/o.

H.No.3-3-1 90, Cheppal Bazar, Hyderabad.

...PETITIONER

lne_ figfr Court_for the State.of .Telangall Hyderabad, rep. by its Registrar Judicial-|, High Court, Hyderabad (Fonial party)

The . Secretary, .Bar _Counsel fof the State of Telangana, at High Court Building, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order or direction, particularly in the nature of a writ of Mandamus, to declare the inaction of the Respondent (Registrar Judicial-l) on the complaints dated O1 .02.2025,19.06.2025, O2.O}.2O2S and ,t4.1O.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, and against the principles of naturar justice and professionar ethics, and B) Direct the Respondent No.1 to take appropriate action on the said complaints as per law, including issuing notices and conducting an inquiry against sri Gurram srinivas and erring regigtry officials and to restrain sri Gurram srinivas, Advocate, from sending any individuals to the office of ch.Ganesh, Advocate, causing nuisance, intimidation, or any form of disturbance forthwith.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B.BALAMUKUND [pARTy-tN-pERSONI

Counsel for the Respondents: --

The Court made the following: ORDER

I

n

TN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF 11 }LANGANA AT

ITYDERABAD

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM 8 OSIIY

AND

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CH.f\l ,APATHI RAO

WP.No.37437 of 2ol25

Dt.30.L2.20.25

Between:

B.Balamukund Rao

......Petitioner

and

The High Court for the State of Telangana and another . .....Respondents O R D E R: per the Hon'ble Sri ..fr-.stice Slud.d,a.lq. Choloipat tt Rao)

1.

Heard Sri B. Balamukund(petitioner/party -in-person) and perused the record.

2.

The instant n,rit petition has been hled vr th the following prayer:

"...to issue an order or direction, more partianlar g in tte nafite of a Writ of Mandamus, to declaing tte inaction,,f the Respondent (Regbtror Judicial- 1 ) on the comptaints ctt ted OZ.O2.2O2 S.

19.06.2025, 02.09.2025 and 14.1O_2O25 as illt:1 al, arbitrary, and.

against tle pirrciples of nafural justie and professional ethics, and; B) Direct the Respondent No.l to take appropriate action on the said amplaints as per lau, including issuing noties and conducting an inquiry agaitLst Si Gunam Siniuas and erring registry officials ond to restrain Si Gurram Sriniua.s, Aduocate, from sending ang indiuiduats to tle olfie of CLt Gonestg Aduocate, cousing nuisance. intimidatiory or ang form of di.sturbance fo,-thutith and pass such order or orders . . .".

3.

Upon considering the writ prayer and the avernents made in the writ affidavit, it is evident that the petitioner seeks directions to the respondents to act upon certain complaints and to initiate action against an advocate and registry officials. Such reliefs do not fall within the scope of writ jurisdiction, as they involve disputed questions of fact and matters that are required to be examined by the competent authorities in accordance with the prescribed procedure. In the absence of violation of a legal right warranting interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, no relief can be granted, and thus, the writ petition is not maintainable

4.

In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as not maintarnable. However, it is left open to the writ petitioner to approach the concerned authorities. No order as to costs.

r

.)

i\

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pen,1 ng, if any, shall stand closed.

AS:i

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. One CC to SRI B.BALAMUKUND [PARTY-IN-PERSOT'I

2. One CC to Ms. V.NAGA LAKSHMI, Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CD Copies

BSRYBSK

A+--

SD/ M.OSMAN ALI BAIG

GISTRAR

OFFICER

=/

2 DRAFTS

HIGH COURT

DATED: 3011212025