Telangana High Court

CRLP/8128/2024 of Shaik Ibrahim Mohammad Vs The State of Telangana on 11 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI l.A.Nos.1 2 ot 2O25 ln/And CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8128 OF 2024 Between: Shaik lbrahim Mohammad, S/o SK Nawabjan Age. 34

13257 |

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI

l.A.Nos.1

2 ot 2O25

ln/And

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8128 OF 2024

Between:

Shaik lbrahim Mohammad, S/o SK Nawabjan Age. 34

Employee, R/o Flat No. 170/8, Block - 15, Phase - l, Miyapur, Cyberabad.

Ye€IIS,,Occ: Software

Janapriya Apartment,

Petitioner/Accused

AND

1. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Cottrt at Hyderabad

2. Smt. Shaik Mubasheera, W/o Shaik lbrahim Mohammed, Age: d0 years, Occ:

Housewife, R/o Block No. 23, Plot No. 105, Raintree Park, Maldyrsian Township, KPHB Colony, Cyberabad.

..,,Respondents

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash CC. No. 2553 of 2023 on the file of XV Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpal ly.

l.A NO: 2 OF 2024

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the oircumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the Higtt Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC. No. 2553 of 2O23 on the file of XV Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally.

l.A.Nos.1 and

l.A NO: 1oF 21025

Between:

Shaik lbrahim Mohammad, S/o SK Nawabjan Age. 35

Engineer, Rl/o Flat No. t70l8, Block - '15, Phase - l, Miyapur Cyberabad.

years, Occ: Software

Janapriya Apartment,

...Petitioner/Accused

AND

1 . The State of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad

2. Smt. Shaik Mubasheera, Wo Shaik lbrahim Mohammed, Age: 3t years, Occ:

Housertfe, Rl/o Block No.23, Plot No. 105, Raintree Park, Malaysian Township, KPHB Colony, Cyberabad.

...Respondents

Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lllemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to give permission to compound the offences, and quash the C.C.

No.2553 of 2023 on the file of XV Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally registered under section 498-A of IPC and sections 3 and 4 of D.P. Act., in the interest of .justice.

l.A. NO: 2OF 2025

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased l:o refer the matter to Lok Adalat for recording the compromise reached betvreen the parties as per the terms of the MOU daled O911112025

consequently allow the Criminal petition by quashing C.C. No.2553 of 2023 on the file of XV Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally.

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Chetluru Sreenivas, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Abhilash Sontake, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.

The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER

'1r

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF

HYDERABAD

TELANGANA AT

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI

l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025

ln/and

CRIMINAL PETITION No.B128 of 2024

DA

th DEc

Between:

Shaik lbrahim Mohammad

.Petitioner

AND

The state of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prgsecutor, High Court at Hyderabad and Another

...Respondents

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

COMMON ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is file<l by the petitioner/accused to quash the proceedings against hirn in C.C.No.2553 of 2023 on the file of learned XV Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

2. lt is submitted by learneo counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the responclent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition. tlre parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, lA.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 have been filed to record the compro t tl- the offences mise between them and to cornPound

3' vide order dated 05.12.2025, this court directed the parties along with their respective counser to appear .before the secretary, High court Legar services committee, High court for the state of Terangana, Hyderabad, for icrentification and to submit a report. 4' purr;uant to the above said direction issued by this court, the partie:; have appeared and the secretary, High court Legar services committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 09,2,025 and the same is praced on record. 5' rn view of the above, r.A.Nos.l and 2 0f 2025are arowed. consequenfly, this criminar petition is ailowed and the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in c.c.No.2553 0f 2023 0n the fire of tearned xv Metroporitan Magistrate, Kukatpally, are hereby quashed. Misc'-"'aneous apptications, if any pending, sha, stand closed //TRUE COPY// A Sd/. P.C.SULEKHA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFTCER To,

1. The XV lrletropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally

2. The lV Additional Junior Civil Judge -cum- XV Additionat Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally, Cyberabad.

3. The stat on House officer, KPHB colony police station, cyberabad

4. Two CCs; to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of ielangana at Hyderat,ad IOUTI

5. One CC to Sri Chefluru Sreenivas, Advocate [OpUCI

6. One CC to Sri Abhilash Sontake, Advocate tOpUCI

7. Two CD Copies ABK /PR . . Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise

,i : a bfi"

HIGH COURT DATED: 1111212025 COMMON OFIDER l.A.Nos.'f and2ol 2025 CRLP.No.8128 o12024 ALLOVITING 'tHE l.A.Nos.l and 2 of 2025 AND THE CRIMINAL PETITION STA .r* i 24JAI{EzE z * tfrf

EFFTEF4|!4.i!F!!,F!?Y lo MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING T'fiis Menrorandtrnr of Understanding is made and executed on this the 09 Day of l.lover;ibe r 2025 at Hyderabad by and bet:ween:- Sl-lAll( IBRAHIM MOHAMMAD S/o, Shaik Nawabjan, Aged about 34 years, :; '1 '' Occ: Pvt.Ertployee, fVo Flat NO.17/B Block-15, Janapriya Apartments, Near Saibaba -femple, Miyapur, IfyderaQad 5,00049 Aaclhar No.6028 7 24471 06; Cell No.798 1 889659 liic'r'cirriiiit:r' rcfci'r'eci to as the,Par$'' oi'' tire "Pirst Part", whioh expressittn : ' ,,,.' ' ; r;lhcrivi:;..- :'ecit.rli'e:; ilr the context shall mean and incIude ali his lreirs, st.tccessQi's, - -,, ... '..-,, ''.1 ;tc!inirtist:riii,:s, icgai I:eljresenlatives, asstgnees aird nomirlees, el'c.) St{A.lK N,IUUASL{EERA Wo Shaik Ibrahim Mohammad, Agecl aboLrt 30 years, ()cc: i-{orrrenraker, Presently R/o Block No.23, Plot No.l05. Raintree Park, \,1riia:,,iln .l i,ivrrship, I(PHB Ct>lony, Cyberabad ('.'ii );t,.'i ii'j.i -j trE868 (l-{ereinafier ret-erred to as the Party of the "Second Part", r,vhich cxpression otherrvisc rccluires to the context shall ltlean and include all her he irs, sLlccessors, achn i ni st rAto rS, I e-ea I representatives, assignees and nom inees, etc. ) WHERET\S, both parties herein were rnaried as per lvluslirn rites and custolns ancl theil rrrrrlrir,ur \.\i.is gler'tbrmed on l6-06-2023 at I{,rclerabad lr'losc1tre iit I(uliatirellr. ilr.: rrir.ri'i'ir,rse is an an'attgcd tnarriage rr'itltin the tirnrily circle. l'!re I \u 0 ,^,,b#n+-

4 rt H lnafflage waS pt€:ceded by an engaget)tent function at tire Mosque Kukattrrally House Board Colony. Ranga Recldy District. Hyderabad, Ihe said rnarriage was : also registered rvith the registrar oirnarriage vide certificate dated Il.-07-2023. : ' WHEREAS diffi:rences cropped up between FirstlParty and Second party because of thei| own separate reasons as they ;believe in two diffurent expectations, lifer;tyles, tho,ght process a,d goals. ' WHEREAS becztuse of incornpatibilitl of minds of the parties, tlre rlarital ie!ationship between tl-relll strainecl sevt:l:el1'an,l the parties he;ein could not leacl hupp), marriecl lifb and disputes, ciisruli:arices and arjcusations arose lretiveen the parties lrerein ancl in spir.' of the best eftt,rr. on'borl, sides the dit]brence berrveeir tltem could not lle resolved. All the et'lbrts made by the elders, well-wishers became futile. Both the parties started Iir ing separately from 16-09-2023 to rill date vvithout having an,v ph-r'sical or euri'riional relationship *ith each other. There afe no issues/childreri out ot'the rveciloci;. : .. , While things stood s.. ho*e'er atier tr,,ilrer endeavour of tlre elclers, relatives and well-.vr,ishers r.r,lro lrursucrl viqor r.rrisi., r,-rrilcl yielcipositive r.esults. ancl as suclr arlived at all ltndet'statlciinq to Sr-'f-,arilt(' fl',-ri'n one and another by rva-y of Klttrlcr betble ihe appropriat.r authorit.v. -l'o avoicj rire legaltussles and litigations, r,r,asti'g ' valuable time anil in view of clcrcpening ditferences between the First party and Second Party firr the saicl pLrrpose the parties hereby enteied i,to this i\4enrbranduitr o['Understancling u'ith r',:,.;rrirecl clar.ity to conclude the disputes attd dift-erences c'n the tbllor'r'ing tci'nls anc conditions as has been agreed to be paid to the secon,:l part1, by the fir.sr part,. ! T" i ,l ( Bs t .,\* rrv

IdOW THIS AGREEMENT FOLLOWS: t'.. ::'!;.;.l.:l.,j

l. . In the light of all the aforesaid, bqth,the parties to this MOU have agreed i- ..rrrt. .., .' , ::1. , I ' to compromise/settle,tfre entire issue and obtain' Khula subject to the following i\ : ' tgrms' -:- ltr ni,; -,; " ..' ,. ' '' ' ' ' l,:"'''..' -" _. j .,i '.. 't .. . . . .. ' i- ..':.:tt._,'.:."t_.'-- __ ,",,t ' ' j:,:"- i . - : :'1tr: ,' ... . ':' '-'

2. First Party has delivled aLf._b."9Jeneings-of the seconcl $arry ro her, wirich the secorrcl part,v hereby acknpwledges. The said process is cornpleted in ,during the ullg tlieir individual authoritv 'bie XV ll fbllolvin.q; f Metropol itan ir1;rgisil'ate, I(ukatpally- arnounis l'i'orrr iiic [irst party. a. ' '' ' l,-j: . .'

b. l'he bnlance arnounr of ( 1,00,0001:,,will be paid to the ' ..j. ;.: :" the sect-rncl part1, procluces r" Ill:, firs!parly,.thg proof the C.C] rstrate, party aflter of-givi Khulct each other nec:cssan' J The mocle of pa;'nrent shall be in the fogm ofDemand Draft/pay

4. Both the parties herein agreed and unclertakes to cooperate with and their counsel s/aclvocartes torvards documentation and filing ot-

S9 *tve

b 9 rb papers/petitions, affidavits, before the ctoucerned authorities, Courts and Lt,.. Adalat Authority whichever necessary.

5. The parties hereto shall I'urlher lir,e and contiuue to tiVe separately and . apart,from each other and ireither oi'tl,t-:rr .shall have the right to the society of' each other qor shrrll alroy or interli-ri.e u,itli eactr otlre:'or tireir respective relatii'es. -: 6t, Both the parties have hereby ag,i'ct:tl ttrat each ofthern rvill lead indepen<ient , ,lit'e witffout inter[erence and the parties irre at liberty to perbrm second tnarriage .t cii',tlieir own choice after compliance ('iralt the terms mgntioned hereinabove; t . '. , ., . :

7. It is agreeC betureen the Firsr I'ii,'iy and Second'Farty that'there are no funher clairus ag;:.inst eaclt other ot't"'ir;'ii:;oc:\'/e I nature -: :

8. ,' Thr: First F'art-r'iinci -'ieconcl [':1, ' .:i',']lt'..'cieciai'e thiLt thele are no l)erlciing. r' /'- -- a l

- .-.,. ti. r .rlr.r: ,] i.'iri'i ^rtr*o CaSgS penclng.peiOre iil:-',, COLII't oi i,.ii\. 1'\\-:.j[:!! iit-: a['rove:i.liij Ca.Se.

g. 'This cleed of N4ernorandum ui'i.',,clerstacling signed in original is filed hefor-e the Clourt,)f Lar.r, arrcl each rrl'lii ,i,:'.rties given tt'tttr copy of the salne. I0. l"he Parties hci'eto strbnrit thirt t!t.:i'c is no colh-rsion, nor an,v fbrcc in , 1'i. Both tiie First Partv ancl Sccc:rcl ir li'. a.g!'c.:)d to l"ionoiit'tire telrns of tiris i\,lein6fandum oilUnrl;.:;taciiiig to [)i'iici..: l,.ililtel iIany part:i failed to tionotrr the terms'of this aqr-eement, the otl-rer part,. is entitled to take iegal course of action for canrpliance ol'such tenns as stipulair.i ii-l this DEED. ,ffi .oN \* i i I I I I I I) A.-i sv- (_' ^

q t6 tt-t .r -r - -^ ^.-^^.^.. I l:f^ ^f ..ilrar r.qr.f\,I ,not tnterlere wlth the personal tife of cther pafi) herein afterin 'The Parties through this Indenture' lrereby mutually agrqes to dissolve the Marriage datecl 1,610612023 and. teacl inctei:endent lives andlhat thal they would anv manner INWITNESSWHEREoFtheaboveparlieshaving tl-re'contents o1' tht: tnenroranclum of r.rnclerstanding, ';'-. --..- :' j r' ,, ; r r- --- -.t^...-+.,.--iI.,,' --i.'r tho tl Srglleqt it')IS ni.nt()riittcli,r'tt oi unclei'stanciiiIg iln the elay, :- ,] mentioried in t.ile pl'es(rpce 9t the ib[[6u'i1g witnesges: '. t' WITNESSITS l' -Anrapu {q^.G*.*j"*o) lrwr-,b*\h/a .B\}E:T<' ?e;iir#''Y'v-r"' / cr+s-v D9 \,sNr,-- tc-* \/ THE ,,,-, ,. ,: PARTYOF t ;':::,. . -_' . . , , ... FIRST t. PART

2. I Ct'n*'" WAo - 4*, qn2o 6I aq t PARTY OF THE '1 t-^{".f-t, ) PARl" t:

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead