Telangana High Court

WP/17201/2025 of M/s. MAYTAS-NCC(JV) Vs The Assistant Commissioner of CT -III on 10 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 17201 OF 202s Between: M/s.

t 348e I

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

WRIT PETITION NO: 17201 OF 202s

Between:

M/s. IvIAYTAS-NCC(JV), Door No. 8-2-120111O1117, Nandinagar, Road No.14, Banjara Hills, Hydera bad-500033, Rep.by its Authorized Signatory Sri Hari Venkata Ramana

...PETITIONER

AND

The Assistant Commissroner of CT -lll, Enf. Wing, O/o The commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Nampally, Hyderabad.

2. The Commercial Tax Officer, Jubilee Hills Hyderabad.

3. The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Commercial Tax Building, Nampally, Hyderabad.

Circle, Punjagutta Division,

Government of Telangana,

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Secretary, (Revenue) CT Dept., Secretariat Building, Hyderabad.

, ..RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of lr/andamus or any other writ order or direction declaring the action of the 1 respondent and 2nd respondent in not refunding excess ITC

lying to the credit of the petitioner even after expiry of more than 9 years is illegal, arbilraty, high-handed and declare the petitioner is entitled for refund of Rs.

4,64,64,3401- along with applicable interest to be calculated till payment in terms of Section 2O(4) rcad with Section 38(6) and Section 38(1 )(b) of TVAT Act, 2005.

IANO:1OF202s

Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the cir )umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou. may be pleased To direct the 1s[ respondent to forthwith initiate steps to procr,: s thr: clainr of refunC

as per annual return filed for [he assessment year 2005-2C ] ;pending dlsposal of the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI V.SIDDHARTH REDDY

Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI SWAROOP OORILLA, S C FOR STATE TAX

The Court made the following: ORDER

\

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE ()F TILANGANA AT YDERABAD

THE HONOTIRABLE, SRI .IT]STICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

TTIE, HONOT-iRABI,E SRI JTIS-TICE SUDDALA CHALAPAI'HI RAO

WRIT PETITION No.17201 OF 2025

Date:10.12.2025

Betwccn:

M/S.MAYTAS-NCC(Jv)

Banjara Hills, Hyderabad,

Rep.bl, its authorized signatorl,. Sri Hari Venkata Ramana petitioner .,\nd The Assistant Commissioner of CT-lll.

Nampalll . Hyderabad and others.

...Respondents

ORDER, (per Hon'ble Sri .Justice l'.hun Koshr)

Heard Mr V.Siddharth Reddy, leamed counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Swaroop Oorilla, leamed Special Govemment Pleader for State Tax, appearing for the respondents and perused the record

2.

Having gone through the pleadings made in the writ petition and upon hearing the leamed Special Government Pleader, we find that the claim of refund rnade b1,the petitioner for the year 2005-06

and the present writ petition is one which filed after twentl,years in 202-5. i{crvever, there seems to be no representatic I made by the petitioner to the resoondent-authorities during this l eriod, at least.

they are not enclosed along rvith the writ petition the petitioner first approach the concerncd - sporrdent.

l.

ln.,'ierv of the same. qe are of the considererl rpinion that lel lespondent No.2 in this case with an appi.t,1 riatc derailcd leprcsentation in respect of its clairlr. Let the saiC rrr ,reserntation be rnade rvithin a period of three weeks. Upon sr.Lcir replesentation being made, respondent No.2 is expected to consiti, !- rhe same on its own merits after verification of the request ivilhir an outer ]iixi[

of another eight weeks there from.

1.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposc of-. No or.der as to costs Misceilaneous applications penciing, if arr shall stand closed.

SD/,(. BHAVANI SWAMY

SI ISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

\SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Assistant Commissioner of CT -lll, Enf Wing'

Commlrciat Taxes, Nampally, Hyderabad '

lc he commissioner of

2. The Commercial Tax Officer, Jubilee Hills Circle' Punia lutta Division'

Hyderabad.

3. The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes' Governmert lf Telangana'

" d;;;;i;aiax Buildlns, Nampallv' Hvderabad

4. The Secretary, (Revenue) CT Dept ' Secretariat' Telar lana State Hyderabad.

5. One CC to SRI V.SIDDHARTH REDDY' Advocate [C t UC]

-';ffi$ffit

6. One CC to SRI SWAROOP OORILLA, SPL G P for State Tax [OPUC]

7. Two CD Copies.

BSK

BS

W

t

HIGH COURT

DATED:1011212025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

\ 1 rrF- JA \)/ i\l )' /J I lr \>, 'ir.* \\

WP.No.17201 of 2025 Qs.51..,'-r. 1 '"i:--:- - DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS "4d q fr.a* Z i.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead