CRLRC/832/2025 of R.Shashikanth Reddy Vs The State of Telangana on 10 December 2025

: COMMON ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI l.A.Nos.4 and 5 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.832 of 2025 loTH DECEMBER, 2025 Between: R.Shashikanth Reddy. .. Petitioner AND The State of Telangana Rep. through Public Prosecutor and 1 other. ...Respondefts COMMONORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner;to quash the proceedings against him passed on 28.06.2018 by the Vll Special Magistrate Court, Hasthinapuram at L.B.Nagar in C.C.No.10 of 2018 (Old CC No734 of 2016) and confirmed on 28.10.2024 by the Xl Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar in Crl.A.No.645 of 20'18, for the offence under Sections 138 of Negotiable lnstruments Act.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Revision Case, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.4 and 5 of 2025 I

have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences.

3. Vide order dated 14.11.2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report.

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 21 .11.2025 and the same is placed on record.

5. ln view of the above, lA.Nos.4 and 5 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Revision Case is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioner passed on 28.06.20'lB by the Vll Special Magistrate Court, Hasthinapuram at L.B Nagar in C C No.'10 of 2018 (Old CC No.734 of 20'16) and confirmed on 28 10.2024 by the Xl Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar in Crl.A.No.645 of 2018, are hereby quashed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed sdl- uoso. tsmall EPUTY REGIS N OFFICER The Xl Additional District and Sessions Judge' Ran Reddy Dast,'ict at L B Nagar : *: : : j:" t:^!Xl ;i }i"".:Tf;:i'i-'; tTj? !::.Y3',,u* o, re, a ns an a a t' Hvderabad louTi To, \

4. One CC to SRl. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Advocate IOPUCI

5. Two CD Copies Svs/PSL (Along with a copy of Joint Memo) I

HIGH COURT DATED:1011212025 HE SIA \

COMMON ORDER

l.A Nos.4 and 5 of 2025 ln/and CRLRC.No.832 of 2025 ALLOWING THE CRLRC AND I.A NO.4 AND 5 OF

o .{- f * /;:' , tlf \i( \ l. \ ? 4 Jr}l 2t26 l

(MEMORANDUM OF CRIMINAL PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION sz&oF BNSS) l4't IN THE HIGH COI,]RT FOR TT{E STATE OF TELANGANA AT: HYDERABAD CRL.R.C. NO, Between: R.Shashikanth Reddy, S/o. R.Papi Reddy, Aged 53 years, Occ: Business, Rlo.12-l-338/A/12, Road No.4 End, lndraprastha Colony, Bandlaguda, Nagole, Mansoorabad, Hyderabad-500068 ...Petitioner AI.ID I . The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, I{igh Court at Hyderabad.

2. P.Govardhan Reddy, S/o. Late P.Bal lleddy, Aged 5l years, Occ: Business, Rio. H.No. 9-1701212, Srinidhi Nest, Shiva Rcddy Guda, Ghatkesar Mandal, G hatkesar-50 I 30 I . . . Respondents l. It is submitted that the present Crirninal Revision Case is liled being fite ol XI Additional District and Sessions Judge Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar confirming the Judgement anci Sentence dated 28-06-2018 in CC No. l0 ol l0l8 (Old CC No. 734 of 2016) passed by VII Special Magistrate oF 2025 N JOINT MEMEO FILED BY THE PETITIONER ANI) RESPONDENT NO.2 aggrieved by the judgment dated 28-10-2024 in Crl.A.No.645 ol20l8 on the ,r1-r .:9- i

Hasthinapuram L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District for the offence under Section 138 ofNI Act.

2. It is submitted that submitted that thereafter, the Petitioner/Accused herein approached the complainant for settlement and on the advice of the elders and well-rvishers have come to an underctanding to settle the financial dispute amicably with the petitioner herein. In view of the said settlement, the petitioner/ accused is paying an amount of Rs.1,35,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Thirty Five Thousand only) by way of cash to the 2'1 respondent towards full and final settlement in respect of the subject matter and the said amount is already handed over to Mr.Ramalingarn who is acting as mediator and the same will be paid by Mr.Ramalingam to the 2nd respondenV complainant as and when the above Criminal lievision Case is allowed.. Hence, in view of the amicable settlement betrvcen the parties, the petitioner and respondent are filing the present Criminal Revision Case to set aside the judgment dated 28-10-2024 in Crl.A.No.645 ol 2018 on the hle of XI Additional District and Sessions Judge Ranga Reddy I)istrict at [,.B.Nagar confirming the Judgement and Sentence dated 28-06-2018 in CC No. l0 of 2018 (Old CCNo.734 of 2016) passed by VII Speciat Magistrate f{asthinapuram L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District flor rhc offence under Section 138 olNI Act N

^,It is therefore prayed that, this Hoir,Ute Court may be pleased to record compromise by setting aside the judgmert dated 2g-ro-2024in crl.A.No.645 0f 20rg on rhe file of XI Additionar Disr.ict and Sessions Judge Ranga Reddy District at L'B'Nagar confirming the Judgement and Sentence dated 2g_06_20rg in CC No. I0 of 2018 (Otd CC No. 734 of j1016) passed by VII Special Magistrate Hasthinapuram L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District and consequently acquit the petitioner/accused and be pleased to pass such other order/s as this Hon'bre court may deem fit and proper i, facts and circumstances of the case in the interest ofjustice. Hence the Joint Memo. R.SHAS ANTI.I REDDY I P.GOVARDHAN I{EDDY hLL Counsel for petitioner Date: /f /tp/202s ?lace: Hyderabad Counsel ,rra"{"ndent No-.{ z A/