WP/26958/2006 of P. Bhagya Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal on 9 December 2025

[ 348e I

1:

,

I

j

:1

jj

i

ij

il

ri

I

i

i

i

:

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEIVIBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHT RAO

WRIT PETITION

:26958 0F 2006

Between:

P. Bhag.ya feddy, s/o. Late P, \grayana Reddy, Aged about 54 years, occ:

9.uperintendent Gr. I Office of Chief Commissionei of Land Adririnistiation, Hyderabad R/o. Hyderabad.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradqsh, Rep. by its principat, secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

-

2. The chief commissioner of Land Administration, Andhra pradesh, Hyderabad.

3. K.c.v.K. Prasad, S/o. venkanna Addl. Asst. commissioner o/o. chief commissioner of Land Administration, Hyderabad, Fl/o. prot No. 5't Chaitanyapuri, Sagar Road, Hyderabad.

-

4. P. Subba Rao, S/o. and age not known, Superintendent Grade-l Office of Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Andhra PraQesh, Hyderabad.

: ..RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Certiorari: a) Call for the record relating to and connected with OA No.

1-7--3-Q of 2005 dt, 14-3-2006 on the file of A.P_, A_dministrative Tribunal and quash by holding the same as erroneous and unsustainable; b) Also catl for the records relating to and connected with proceedings CCLA's F.No. D1t2253t2002 dt. 8-8- 2005 and also proceedings CCLAs F.No. D11225312002 dt. 16-8-2005 of the 2nd Respondent and quash or set aside by hotding the same as arbitrary, illegal, improper and unsustainable and consequently, treat the petitioner to have been promoted to the postof Additional Assistant Commissioner on and from 8-8-2005

i.e, the date on which the 3rd Respondent was so promoted with all consequential benefits including seniority pay fixation etc c) Also declare the action of the Respondents No. 1 and 2 in not considering the case of the Petitioner fo' being promoted as Additional Assistant Commissioner in the office of the 2nd Flespondent inspite of the fact that the petitioner is senior to the 3rd and 4th Respondents as arbitrary, illegal, unjust and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the corstitution of lndia d) Also declare that the petitioner is entitled to be promoted as; Additional Assistant Commissioner on and from 8-8-2005 i.e, the date on whir:h the unofficial Respondent was promoted as Additional Assistant Commissioner by the 2nd Respondent herein with all consequential benefits which would flow from out of such a promotion.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T. KRISHNA KUMAR REP. FOR SRI SIVA

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2: GP FOR REVENUE

Counsel for the Respondent No.3 & 4: - - - - The Court made the following: ORDER

g

\\

tI

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT YDERABAI)

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

WRIT PETITION No.26958 OF 2006

Date:09.12.2025

Between:

Mr.P.Bhagya Reddy

petitioner

And

The State of Andhra Pradesh,

Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others.

Respondents

ORDER: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)

None appears for the petitioner, even when the matter is called repeatedly. Considering the age of the petitioner when the writ petition was filed and the present period of time elapsed, perhaps, the petitioner must have lost interest in the writ petition and that could be the reason for his non-representation.

[n view of the same, we have left with no option except to dismiss the same for non-prosecution.

3.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, with liberty to revive in the event if the petitioner moves an appropriate application about the same. No costs.

closed.

1. One CC to SRI SIVA,

2. Two CCs to GP FOR

lourl

3. Two CD Copies

BN

BS

fnttn.

Advocate IOPUC]

REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana Oonsequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand SD/.MOMINA MEHAR

AS

REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

ECTION OFFICER

To,

HIGH COURT

DATED:09/1 212025