Telangana High Court
WP/31757/2025 of K.Gopal Rao Vs State Bank of India on 8 December 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT H (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO: 31757 0F 2025 Between: AND t [..eopq] Rao S/o K.Pitchaiah, Aged about 75 years,
[ 3300 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT H
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 31757 0F 2025
Between:
AND
t [..eopq] Rao S/o K.Pitchaiah, Aged about 75 years, Occ. poultry Business, R/o. 5-5, Raikal Village Et Post, F-rooq Nagar Mandat, Ranga Reddy District.'
2. Konedhina L-alitha @ Kunidena Lalitha, Wo. Gopal Rao, Aged about 64
years, Occ. Business,_Fl/o. D.No 5-6, Plot No.'16, Sy.No.402, Raikal Village, Farooqnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District
...PETITIONERS
'l . State Bank of lndia, Rep. bv
Branch, D.No.1-8-563/i, tst
Chikkadpally, Hyderabad
its Autho_rised Officer, Stressed Assets Recovery Floor, Opp. Sandhya Theatre, RTC 'X' Roa<i,
2. The Branch Manager, SBl, Shadnagar, Mahabubnagar District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents Bank in not considering the Petitioner's Representation Dt. 02106/2025 with regard to the payment of balance payable amount under the Loan Account No.6213232273
under the Hypothecation Agreement (HO-1290) and Guaranteed Agreement (HO- '1206) saying that in contemplation by misnaming the petitioner-2 i.e., Kunidena Lalitha instead of Konedhina Lalitha as per the records available with the Respondents are germane in nature to the subject property i.e. house situated at Plot No,16 admeasuring Ac.0-35 Gts., and land admeasuring Ac.0-30 Gts., respectively in Sy.No.402, Raikal Village, Farooqnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District (Erstwhile Shadnagar Mandal, l\ilahaboobnagar District) and also without following the due procedure as contemplated under the statutory provisions as illegal and arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and apart from being violative of principles of natural justice and consequently issue a direction, directing the Respondents Bank herein to forthwith consider the Petitioner's Representation Dt. 02.06.2025 for necessary steps to be taken with regard to the settlement of payable balance amount under the Loan Account No.621323227 3 under the Hypothecation Agreement (HO-
1290) and Guaranteed Agreement (HO-l206).
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue a direction, directing the Respondents Bank herein to forthwith consider the Petitioner's Representation Dt. 02.o6.202s for necessary steps to be taken with regard to the settlement of payable balance amount under the Loan Account No.621323227 3 under the Hypothecation Agreement (HO-1290) and Guaranteed Agreement (Ho-l206) pending disposal of the main writ petition in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. VENKATA KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondents: --
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAI(A
WRIT PETITION No.3 L757 of 2025
o4.L2.202s
Between:
K.Gopal Rao and another
.Petitioner
AND
State Bank of India, Rep. by its Authorised Officer, Stressecl Assets Recovery Branch, D.No. 1-8-563/ 1, 1"t Floor, Opp:Sandh5rs Theatre, RTC X'Road, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad and another
...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ Petition is filed challenging rhe action of respondents Bank in not considering the representation of the petitioners dated 02.06.2025 with regard to the payment of balance payable amount under the Loan Account under the Hypothecation Agreement and Guaranteed Agreement. I i a
2. Heard Sri V.Venkata Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners. Despile service of notice, none appeared for the respondents. Perused the record
3. Learned cc;unsel for the petitioners made submissions on the lines of writ affidavit and requested this Court to direct respondents Bank to consider the petitioners' representation dated 02.06.2O25 as expeditiously as possible.
4. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for petitioners and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents bank to cons:der the petitioners' representation dated 02.06.2025 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with la'uv within a period of three (03) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioners. No costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand ciosed. t SD/.P. PONNA KRISHNA ANT REGISTRAR /TRUE COPY/ SECTION OFFICER Assets State Bank of
1. To The Authorised Officer, Stressed iffr:'6'.i.r;l--8-se:r1, 1" Floor' Ctikkao PullY, HYderabad' Opp. SandhYa nch, RTC 'X' Road,
2. The Branch Manager, SBl, Shadnagar, l/ahabubnagar District.
3. One CC to SRI V. VENKATA KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CD Copies IUP BS \,u \
HIGH COURT DATED:08|1212025 c,.tlsi l) 1 [;[ irrX '; ') E WP.No.31757 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION HOUT COSTS a. \ I o x(