TREVC/25/2010 of M/S.BHARATHI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Vs THE SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL on 8 December 2025

[ 348s I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

TAX REVISION CASE NO:25 oF 2010

Revision case is filed under Section 22(1) of APGST Act, 1g5Z against the order dated 05.08.2009 in T.A.No.381 0t 2004 0n the fite of the court of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad.

Between:

lr,1/s. Bharathi Conslruction Company, Ellandu Road, Mahaboobbabad, Warangal District. rep by its Managing Partner lvlr T.someswara Rao.

...Petitioner

AND

State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its State Representative, before Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad.

...Respondent

Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. S. Dwaraknath Counsel for the Respondent : - The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF-t ELANGANA

AT HYDERABAI)

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SA}I KOSHY

AND

:I'HE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICI

SUDDALA CHAI-APATHI RAO

TREVC.No.25 of 2010

Dated: 08.12.2025

Bctrvecn

Mis. Bharathi Construction Company,

Illandu I{oad. Mahaboobabad.

\\tarangal Distlict.

I{ep. by its N4anaging Partner,

Mr. I'.Sornesr,i ara Rao,

Petitioner

AND

Statc of Andhra Pradesh.

Rep.by its State Representative,

Ilelbre Sales Tax Appellate l'ribunal,

I Il delabad.

. . Respondent

OItDER, (per flon'hle Sri.Iustit:e P.Sam Koshl,)

Mr. S.Drvaraknath, learncd counsel for the petitic:r:r'submits that in spite of best efforls, the petitioner has not been con,i oting nor is he traceable and. therefore, lcarned counsel for the pctiri rner pleads no , t lnstructlons

2

2.

ln view of the same, this Bcnch is left with no option but to dismiss the Tax Revision Case for want of prosecution rvith liberty to the petitioner to revive the sarne rvith an appropriatc application ,,vith .lustifiable reasons! that too in case if the grievancc still survives.

3.

Thc casc is accordingly dismissed fbr rvant of prosecution.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall srand closed.

Sd/- MOHD. ISMAIL

DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

1 The Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad' (With records)

2. One CC to Mr. S. Dwaraknath, Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CD CoPies

.1(v

To,

L

D

I

HIGH COURT

DATED:0811212025