Telangana High Court

TREVC/78/2010 of M/S. T. GANGAIAH AND COMPANY, HYDERABAD Vs THE STATE OF A.P., REP BY STATE REPRESENTATIVES, HYDERABAD on 8 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR. THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER T\ A /O THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO Tax Revision Under Section 22 (1) of the APGST Act, 1957 against the order dated

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR. THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER

T\A/O THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

Tax Revision Under Section 22 (1) of the APGST Act, 1957 against the order dated 07-09-2009 in T.A.No. 321 of 2006 on the file of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad Between:

M/s. R. Gangaiah and Company, Ameerpet, Hyderabad

...PETITIONER

AND

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its State Representatives Beforethe Sales ili AppEUaie TriOrnaiOpp. Gan,ini 6havan, Namfally A.P., Hyderabad

...RESPONDENT

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. B. SRINIVAS

Counsel for the Respondent: NONE APPEARED

The Court made the following ORDER:

(

t

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THT}HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE

SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

T.RC.No.78 OF 2010

Dated: 08.12.2025

Between:

IWs.Gangrliah & Company,

Ameerpet, Hyderabad.

AND

The State r:f Andhra Pradesh,

Rep. by th,e State Representative,

Before the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Opp.Gandri Bhavan, Nampally, Hyderabad..

. . . Petitioner

...Respondent

ORDER: (cer lTon'ble Sri Justice P.Sam Kosh.y)

Today, when the matter is taken up {br hearing, Mr.B.Srinivas, leamed counse[ for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that he is not pressing on the present l'ax Revision Case.

2.

Accc'rdingly, the Tax Revision Case stands dismissed as not pressed. There shall be no order as to costs.

2

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending,'if any, shall stand closed.

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. The Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal' A-P-, Hyderabad

2. One CC to SRl. B. SRINIVAS, Advocate [OPUC]

r 3. Two CD CoPies

kul/PSL

SD'. N SRIHARI

OFFICER

)

1l

&

\

HIGH COURI'

DATED:08l,1?2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

TREVC.No.78 o12010 DISMISSING T]fr TAX REVISION CASE AS NOT PRESSED WITHOUT COSTS a *,' ) e

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead