Telangana High Court
MACMA/741/2022 of Shriram General Insurance Co.Ltd Vs Smt. Dandugula Laxmi on 5 December 2025
I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISGELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 741 OF 2022 Appeal Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act against
\'\
[ 3485 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISGELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 741 OF 2022
Appeal Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act against the Judgment and Decree in M.V.O.P.No.190 of 2018 dated 28-09-2022 on the file of the Court of the Chairman Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-ll Additional District Judge, Nizamabad.
Between:
Shriram General lnsurance Co.Ltd, Branch Office D.No.5-6-5708,2nd Floor, Axis Bank Building, Near Hotel Kapila, Hyderabad Road, Nizamabad, Rep. b_y Legal Manager, H.No.3-6-517, 4th Floor, Sai Data Arcade, Street No.6, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad.
...AppellanURespondent No.2
AND
1. Smt. Dandugula Laxmi, Wo.Dandula Narsaiah, Age 40 years, Occ. House Wife,
2. Dandugula Narsaiah, S/o.Buddenna, Age 45 years, Occ.Labour,
3. Dandugula Prakash, S/o.D.Nar:saiah, Age 20 yearsJ Occ. Student, All are R/o.H.No.2-101101, Mamidpally Village of Makloor Mandal, Dist. Nizamabad.
. . . Respondents/Petitioners
, Age Major, Occ. Owner of The Auto bearing 5-49, Ramchandrapally Village of Makloor
4. Sirsu Venkawa, Wo.Narsaiah
No.TS-1 6-U8-4238, R/o. H. No.
Mandal, Dist. Nizamabad.
...RespondenURespondent No.1
lA NO:2 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings of the exeeution of the Judgment a1!
decree passed in tr/VOP No.190 of 2018, dated 28.09.2022, on the file of MACT
cum ll AdOitional District and Sessions Judge, Khammam pending disposal of the above appeal in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI KONDADI AJAY KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondents: _
The Court madrl the following: JUDGMENT
r
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
M.A.C.M.A.No 74L OF
Date: o5.L2.2025
Between:
Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, Represented by its Branch Manager, Nizamabad District.
...Petitioner
AND
Smt. Dandugula Laxmi and three
others.
i'
"'ResPondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
Pursuant to the request made by the learned counsel appearing for both the parties, the matter was referred to Lok Adalat. On 13.09.2025, the matter was settled between the parties and an award to that effect was passed by the Lok Adalat.
2. In view of the above, the M.A.C.M.A. is disposed of in terms of the award, dated 13.09.2025, passed by the Lok Adalat. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- M JAWAHAR REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR G //TRUE GOPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Chairman Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-ll Additional District Judge, Nizamabad.
2. One CC to Sri KondadiAjay Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] O 3. Two CD Copies \
HIGH COURT DATED: 0511212025
JUDGMENT
MACMA.No.741 ot 2022 DISPOSED OFF IN TERMS OF AWARD PAS$ED BY LOK ADALAT () c) 1 I Hr\fl ?-l.!?fi ( I Fl t *
I HlGl-l ' lnlcn couRT FOR TH ATE O.F 6runder Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Central Act)l
* Present: 1. Hon'ble Justice G.Sri Devj, (Former Judge, Hon,ble High Court for thi State of Telangana) Chairman
2. Smt. Nandita Guha, Advocate, Member (Before the Hon,bte High Court) {, .S13& oi1 AGAINST (onthefil.eofthe*o.o.o...ffiistrictJuclge)atNizamabad) iIACMA No.694 of 2022 Between:-
1. Smt- Danduguta Laxmi, W/o.Danduta Narsiaah, Aged about 44years, Occ: Housewife, 2- Danduguta Narsaiah, s/o.Budenna, Aged about 4fyears, occ: Labour,
3. Danduguta Prakash, s/o.D.Narsaiah, Aged about zi years, occ: student, At[ are R/o.H.No.2 -10/ 101, Mamidipat[y Vittage, Maktoor Mandal, Nizamabad District. . . . Appellants/Petitioners
1. Sirsu Venkawa, W/o.Narsaiah, Aged: ."j): Occ: Owner of the Auto bearing No" TS_i6_UB-423g, R/o.H.No. 5-49, Ramchandrapatty Vittage of Maktoor Mandat, Dist. Nizamabad.
7. Shriram General Company Limited, Rep. by its Branch Manager, Branch Office, D.No.5-6-5708,znd Ftoor, Axis Bank auitalng, Near Hote[ raiita, HvJeiiuaa Road, Nizamabad Town, Nizamabad District. ... RespondentslRespondents Between:- llACrtrtA. No. 741 of 2022 Shriram Genera[ Co.Ltd., Branch Office D.No.5-6-5708, Znd Hoor, Axis Bank Buitding, Near. Hotel.t-{pila, Hyderabad Road, Nizamabad, Rep. by LegatManager, H.No.3 -o-tg, 4In Floor, sai Datta Arcade, street No.6, Himayathnagar, t{yc"rabad. ..Appellant/Respr.rnder,t No. 2 AND
1. Smt. Dandugula Laxmi, W/o.Danduta Narsaiah, Aged 40 years, Occ: House wife,
2. Danduguta Narsaiah, S/o.Buddenna, Age 45 years, Occ: labour,
3. Danduguta Prakash, S/o.D.Narsaiah, Age 20 years, Occ: Student, At[ are R/o.H.No.2 -10/101, Mamidpatty Vittage of Maktoor Mandat, Dist.Nizmabad. . . Respondents/petitioners
4. Sirsu venkawa, w/o.Narsaiah, Age Major, occ: owner of rhe Auto bearing No. T5-1 6-U8-4738, R/o.H. No. 5-49, Ramchandrapal,l.y Vittage of Maktoor Mandal, Dist. Nizamabad. counser ror the Appeuants/craimants / petitionerr, fiTrTii:IfiTf::iij.ll;' Counse[ for Respondent No.2/ lnsurance. Campany : Sri K.Ajay Kumar, Advocate. Representative of lnsurance company : sri Mohammed Babu, Manager, These appeats having been referred'for setttement before this Lok Adatat and after hearing the Learned Counset for the parties and atso the parties, the fottowing award is passed: r r+isl{'cnu?17 LOK ADALI\"I '$ir-,.ii-; f il t I i ) I alwAEU AdditionaI Di rection (s):
1. The A:pettantsiPetitioners are entitted to the refund of Court Fee paid in this case. 7-. The arnount atready deposited by the tnsurance Company, if any, shatt be given credit to.
3. Soon itfter deposit by the lnsurance Company, the Appettant/Petitioner/Claimant Nos.1 [o 3 are permitted to withdraw their entire share amounts. ln tokr:n of consent for the above settlement and award, the parties and their counsel have signed this award in our presence. ln terrrs of the compromise arrived at between the parties, both the appeaLs i.e.; ,a _^l MACMA Ncr.694 of 2022ancl MAClrrtA No.741 of Zazlstand disposed of A ,#tfff , by the Tribunal Awarded Rs.8,74,000/- (Rupees Eight takhs Seventy-four thousand interest al 9% per annum from the date of petition titt the deposit. Compensation .Awarded (Setttement Reached) in the Lok Ada.at. l.rr.'i.i Cr'1i ji !.-Q1( ,r',.;r;.;-r1. t- 't.,',r,";.;1 MACMA No.694 of 2027 has been preferred by the Ctaimants/Petitioners and MACMA No.741 of 7O22has been preferred by the lnsurance Company aggrieved by the order passed in MVOP No.190 of 2018 by the Motor Accident Ctaims Tribunal. (ll Addt. District Judge) At Nizamabad. Sri Mohammed Babu, Manager for the Appettant/Respondent No.2- lnsurance Company has appeared bef"ore the Lok Adatat and represented that the Appettant/Petitioner/Ctaimant Nos. 1 to 3 have appeared before the District LegaI Services Authority, Nizamabad. It is reported that during the pendency of both Appeats, the Appel.Lants/Petitioners/Ctaimants and Appettant/ Respondent No.Z- lnsuran,:e Company represented that they have mutuatty entered into a compromise and settted the matter. ln pursuance of the same, the Appel,tants/Petitioners/Ctaimants have agreed to receive an amount of Rs.6,00,000/- (Rupees Six lakhs onty) in addition to the amount atready deposited by the lnsurance Company towards futl and final setttement of their ciaim and the lnsurance Company has agreed to pay the same towards futt and final setttement of the ctaim. Accordingty, compromise is recorded and the Award is passed before the Lok Adatat. ln view of the above said setttement, the lnsurance Company has agreed to deposit the above said amount within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this Award, after deducting the amount that was deposited, if any. ln the event of defautt or detay in making such deposit, the Claimants/Appettants/ Petitioners are entitled to claim interest as awarded by the Tribunat. Apportionmert of Compensatior, if any The apportionment among the Appettant/Petitioner/Ctaimant Nos.1 to 3 shatl be made as per the apportionment determined by the Tribunal in MVOP.190 of 2018.
{ .-.'-'_---- '_-_ -_:_-.'' _ :_-:::-i:-:-.1:-:::r_';':'-l -"- ' I cr,1Anlo: +:+tl" q 6n)
V oP cASENo. tq0 %tk {td Al ID Applicant (s) (!.-urr*-xl Counsel for applican
(s) t S'=Fi,r'ir N t a ,--- -oS/ i ,fl* * CHAIRMAN MEMBER i ",' '' ( Respondent (s) /9^^-.-. Co. L' : lnsurance Signalr'1 i ., itam Pr-P0%- 4U,?2,bt0+) ?e'D ?ak'Yl^. )' Counselfor respondent (s) i ;i * I , f { : I { It i I : : I i G^r-{ C$)