Telangana High Court
CC/1026/2025 of Dasari Manjula Vs Md. Anwar on 5 December 2025
lN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAI'IA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER , TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1026 OF 2025 Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the
[ 3168 I
lN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAI'IA
AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER ,
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1026 OF 2025
Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents herein violating and disobeying the directions of the High Court dated 2547-2024 passed in W.P.No.2004O of 2024.
Between
Dasari Manjula, w/o Dasari Rajamallaiah, Age: 35 years, Ooc: Agriculture, R/o.
H.No.3-33, Chendanavelly, Shabad, Ranga Reddy District.
...Petitioner
AND
1. Md. Anwar, S/o. & Age: Not Known to the Petitioner, Occ: Tahsildar, Shabad Mandal, Ranga ReddY District.
2. Anjaneyulu, 5/o. & Age: Not Known to the Petitioner, Occ: Mandal Surveyor, Shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
...Respondent
Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. P. Ramulu Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Ms. Tekuru Swetcha, Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue The Court made the following: ORDER
I
I
I
I
I
l
IN TIIE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELAI\GATIA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
CONTEMPT CASE No.1026 of 2025
DATE OF ORDER: 05.12.2025
Between:
Dasari lvtanjula.
Petitioner.
AND
Md.Anu,ar and another.
Respondents.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
Hr:ard Mr.P.Ramulu, leamed counsel for the petitioner and Ms.Telorru Swetcha, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenur:
2. Tlnis Contempt Case is flled alleging willful and deliberate violation of order dated 25.07.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.20040 of 2024.
3. By the aforesaid order, this Court disposed of the said Writ Petitiorr directiqrg respondent Nos.3 and 4 therein to consider the ,/
I I I
F-line apptication bearing No.TTDER022300974086, dated 08.02.2023 submitted by the petitioner, conduct sunrey and demarcate the subject property by fixing boundaries, strictly in accordance with law, by putting the petitioner and all affected parties on notice, within a period of forty five (45) da),s from the date of receipt of a copy of the said order. According to the petitioner, the respondents did not comply with the said order.
4. Whereas, respondent No.l filed counter contending that the petitioner is not in physical possession of the subject property. Therefore, conduct of survey is not possible. He has also referred the Circular in Rc.No.Nlll48}l07, dated 13.07.2007. The said fact was also infonned to the petitioner vide endorsement dated 07 .07.202s
To punish the rcspondettts/contemnors in terms of Sections 10 and 12 of the Conternpt of Coutts Act, 1971, thete should be willful and deliberate violation of the order. Mere allegation that respondents violated the otder under contempt is not suffrcient. \
J / :]
6. In the present case, respondent No.l had already informed the said fact to the petitioner vide endorsement dated 07.07.2025 stating that conduct of survey is not possible and thus, his F-line application is accordingly disposed of.
7. In the light of the same, this Contempt Case is closed. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the said endorsement dated 07.07.2025 passed by respondent No.l Tahsildar, Shabad Mandal. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Contempt Case shall stand closed Sd/. K. AMMA..|I DEPUW REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII
To, SECTION OFFTCER
1. One CC to Mr. p
2. Two CCs to Gp . Ramulu, Advocate tOpUCl rFOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at I
HIGH COURT DATED:05/1 212025
ORDER
GG.No.1026 of 2025 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE (J t * 1HE 57 0 7 "c 2ii26 * @ a lu