Telangana High Court
CRLRC/888/2025 of D. Uday Kumar, Vs The State of Telangana on 4 December 2025
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 888 OF 2025 Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 438 and 442 of BNSS agarnst the order dated
13257 |
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 888 OF 2025
Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 438 and 442 of BNSS agarnst the order dated 28.03.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.691 of 2025 Crl. Appeal No.42 of 2025 in
CC.NO6232 of 2021 (old CC.NO.60 of 2019) on the file of the court of the I
Additional District and Sessions Judge-Cum-Additional Family Court Special Sessions Judge for Fast Tracking the Cases Relating to Atrocities Against Women at lvlalkajgiri Kushaiguda Between:
D. Uday Kumar,, Age 5'1 Years, Occ RPA
2681K133, Navodaya Colony, Sagar Society, Hyderabad, Telangana 500032
Creations, R/o. H- No
Road No 2, Banjara
B-2-
Hills,
...Petitioner/AppellanUAccused
AND
1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor T.S. High Court, Hyderabad.
...Respondent
2. Smt. Gurrala Vijitha, Wo. Pawan kumar Reddy Age 43 years, Occ Business, R/o H. No. Villa No. 5 A, Modi Builders, Sunshine Park, Ghatkesar, Medchal- Malkajgiri District.
..RespondenUComplainant
lA NO: 2 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to reduce the 20% of compensation amount to 10o/o and extend 15 days time to deposit 10% ol compensation amount Before The lV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Uppal at L.B. Nagar in CC.No.6.2:i2 of 202j, pending disposal of the presenl Criminal Revrsion Case.
Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S JMS LAW FIRM, Advocater; and Associates Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Sri M.ramachandra Reddy, Additional public Prosecutor Counsel for the Respondent No.2: None Appeared The Court made the following: ORDER
_=7
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.888 of 2025
o4TH DEcEMBER,2025
Between:
D Uday Kumar
Petrtioner
AND
The State of Telangana
Rep. by rts Public Prosecutor and another Responde nts
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
:ORDER:
Challenging the order, dated 07.05.2025 passed ln Crl M.P.No.691 of 2025 in Criminal Appeal No.42 of 2025 by the learned lll Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-ll Additional lr4etropolitan Sessions Judge, Medchal-Malkajgiri District at Kukatpally, this Criminal Revrsion Case is filed. By the impugned order, the petition liled by the petitioner under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C was allowed and the sentence of imprisonment imposed against the petitioner was suspended, subject to his depositing 2OoA of compensation amount i.e., Rs.2,80,000/- within (60) days before the Court of lV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Uppal at L.B Nagar (for short 'trial Court')
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and lvlr [/l.Ramachandra Reddy, rearned Additionar [)ubri,: prosecutor appearing foi" respondent No.'1 -State and perused the record.
3. Learned counser for the petitioner submittec rhat the sessions Court, while suspending the sentence of imprison lent, imposed a condition directing the petitioner to deposit 2ook ol rhe ,:ompensation before the trial cou(, within (60) days from the date cf the order However, the petitioner was unable to comply with lhe said condition within the stipulated tirne due to financial constr.aints lt is further submitted that lhe petitioner is ready and wilring ro deposit the said amount, and therefore confines his prayer seeking a n extension of time for such deposit
Learned Additional Publrc prosecutor reportecl rro objection
5. Considering submissions made Criminal Revision the facts and ctrcumstances of the case. and the by the learned counsel for r he petitioner, this Case is disposed of, di deposit 2Oo/o of the compensation amount i.e , Rs.ll,B0,000/-, before the Court of IV Addrtional Judicial Magistrate of Fr -st Clzrss, Uppal at L.B. Nagar, on or before 17 12 2025. rectingy the petitioner to
'- '; a3:_rc'4l !,'/ ./
To, N\'B Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- N. CHANDRA SEKHAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR i/TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER '1 . The I Additional District and Sessions Judge-Cum-Additional Family Court Special Sessions Judge for Fast Tracking the cases Relating Top Atrocities Against Women at Malkajgiri Kushaiguda
2. The Junior civil Judge-cum-lV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First class, Uppal at L.B Nagar
3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
4. One CC to M/s JMS LAW FIRM AND ASSOCIATES, Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CD Coptes s
HIGH COURT DATED:041121?-025 \
ORDER
CRLRC.No.888 of 2025 q DISPOSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE ac u- \ , L- cC \ ,.( ,-P , r'ni t:-l'r.'
* C.1.7 --gt'