WP/11233/2009 of M/S. CYBER PEARL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, HYD. Vs COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AND 3 OTHERS on 27 November 2025

[348e ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

WRIT PETITION NO: 1 1233 OF 2009

Between:

AND

M/S. Cyber Pearl lnformation Technology, Park Private Limited (formerly L

and T lnfocity Ascendas Limited) Ground Floor, Unit-3, Block-1 , Cyber Pearl Hitec City, Madhapur, Hyderabad, Rep. by its City Head- Hyderabad, Sri M.

Bharani.

...PETITIONER

Commercial Tax Officer, Hyderabad

Assistant Commissioner (CT) Audit, VAT Management tJnit-ll, Hyderabad Rural Division, Hyderabad.

Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT), Hyderabad Rural Division, Hyderabad Additional Commissioner (CT) (L), Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus granting stay of collection of the disputed tax of Rs. 20,13,4691 for the assessment year 2005-06 under the APVAT Act arising in pursuance of the stay rejection order of the fourth respondent dt.19-5-2009 passed in CCTs Ref. No.Llll(4)/'l80/2009 pending disposal of the appeal before the third respondent or

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP. NO: 14436 0F 2009)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cir'< umstances stated in the affidavit filed in r;upport of the petition, the High Court ma1 be pleased to direct the first respondent not to enforce the collection of te disputed tax of Rs.20,13,469/- for t.re assessment year 2005-06 under the I PVAT Act arising in pursuance of the stay rejection order of the fourth responden. jt.l9-5-2009 passed in CCT's Ref.No. Llll(4)/1 80/2009 pending disposal of the writ retition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NARENDRA DAVE, REPRE: =NTING

M/S LAKSHMI KUMARAN & SRIDI ARAN, ADVOCATE

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAx The Court made the following: ORDER

e=-.<r-ffi7 ,/

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE

SUDDALA CHALAPATHT RAO

W.P.No.ll233 OF 2009

OIiDER: (pe r l{on'ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshyl Mr. Narendla Dave, leamed counsel representing Mr.Lakshmi Kumaran Slidharan, learned counsel tbr the petitioner, submits that the rnatter has since become infructuous

2.

Accordingly, the rvrit petition is dismissed as having become inftuctuous. Howevcr, the petitioner is given liberty to approach the Cou( if at all any subsequent cause of action arises. There shall be no order as to costs Consequently, rniscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed SD/.

,/TRUE COPYI/

To.

1. One CC to M/s Lakshmi Kumaran & Sridharan A\

,l :y;r::,."1"rffi [oi""..."

rci a I r ax' H i sh co u rt ro r

3. Two CD CoPies

TJ

LS \q-

AiSflNYtEt,EiRRX

SECTION OFFICER

e [OPUC]

the State of Telangana'

I

!

i

HIGH COURT

DATED:2711112025