Telangana High Court
CA/6/2025 of Shaik Janimiya, Vs Sri Rajeev Trivedi, IPS, on 26 November 2025
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAI) THI,'RSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SD( /. :PRESENT: TIIE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSIil' AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDTKONDA - CONTENIPT APPEAL NO: 6 OF 2025 ,,- Between: Sri Koppula Venkat Reddy,
IN THE HIGII COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAI)
THI,'RSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SD(
/.
:PRESENT:
TIIE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSIil'
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDTKONDA - CONTENIPT APPEAL NO: 6 OF 2025 ,,- Between:
Sri Koppula Venkat Reddy, S/o. Late Somi Reddy, Aged about: 45 years, Occ: Authorized officer-cum- Revenue Divisional O{ficer, Land Reforms Tribunal, Attapur, Rajendranagar Mandal, Rangareddy District Appellant
AND
Nawab Mohd. Yousufuddin Khan, S/o. Late Nawab Wajiuddin Khan, Rio. H. No. 19-3- 2621 21 5, Jahanuma, Hyderabad +-- . . . Respondent Appeal under Section I 9 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971, pralng that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therein, the High Court may be pleased to allow the Contempt Appeal by setting aside the order dated 16.04.2026 in CC.No.1563 of 2025; :}L
The Appeal coming on for hearing, upon perusing the memorandum of grounds filed therein, and upon hearing the arguments of Sri A. Sudarshan Reddy, Advocate Ceneral representing Sri Pottigari Sridhar Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant, and Sri S. Sridhar Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent, the Court made the following;
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard. The Contempt Appeal is admitted for hearing. Considering the fact that there is an order of conviction, prima facie, a strong case for grant of interim suspension of the impugned order is made out. t l I.A. NO: I OF 2026: Petition under Section 151 of C.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therein, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order passed in CC. No. 1 563 of 2025, dated: 16.04.2026, pending disposal of CA No. 6 of 2026, on the file ol the High Court.
It is submitted that order .has since been complied with, which is not in dispute by other side. There shall be interim suspension of the operation of the impugned order, dated 16-04-2026 passed in C.C. No. 1563 of 2025, till the next date of hearing. Let counter be filed and the matter be listed for hearing on 0l-07 -2026. SD/-K.SHYLESIII JOINT REGISI'RAR To, //TRUE COPY' SECTION T'FICER
l. Nawab Mohd. Yousufuddin Khan, S/o. Late Nawab Wajiuddin Khan, R/o. H. No. 19- 3-2621215, Jahanuma, Hyderabad (BY SPAD)
2. The Registrar (Judicial), High Court for the State ofTelangana, at Hyderabad
3. The Section Officer, OS Section, High Court for the State ofTelangana, at Hyderabad
4. One CC to Sri Pottigari Sridhar Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
5. One CC to Sri S.Sridhar Reddy, Advocate (OPUC)
6. Two spare copies
HIGH COURT PSK J & NNRJ NOTE: POST ON 0l-07-1026
ORDER
CONTE}IPT APPT {I \O. 6 OF 2025 INTERI},I SUSPEN SI0\ ) )t' DATE: 23-04-2026 ,fr. \. F- E a:( E- L ":-. ='::5r