Telangana High Court
CRP/4179/2025 of Smt. G.V. Satyavathi Vs Dappu Narasimha on 21 November 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENry FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:4179 OF 2025 Petition under Afticle 227 of the Constitution of lndia, praying that in the
[ 3168 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE TWENry FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:4179 OF 2025
Petition under Afticle 227 of the Constitution of lndia, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, The High Court may be pleased to drrect the Iower court to on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Malkajigiri, Malkajigiri Court Complex, tr/lalkajig iri-M edchal District to consider the petitioner's hardship and dispose the IAs at the earliest as time bound fixed by this Hon'ble Court in O.S. No. 2145 of 2022 and pass Between:
Smt. G.V. Satyavathi, W/o. T. Naga Hanumatha Rao, Aged about 59 years, Qc9, E_pployee, r/o. Flat No. 201, on Plot No. 466, Shiva Sai Apartments, St. No.23, Gayathri Nagar, Malkajigiri, Malkajigiri-tvledchat Dist.
...PETITIONER
AND
'1. Dappu Narasimha, S/o. Dappu Balaiah, Aged about 73 years, Occ. Business, r/0. 3-16, Laxmapur Village, Medchal, Malakajigir-tvledchal Dist.
2. Smt. C, Rani Wo. C.Y.Raju, aged about 39 years, Occ. Housewife, r/o. 1-5- ' 631141 , Ambedkar Nagar, Old Aiwal, Secunderabad.
3. Mugyari Venu, S/o. M. Jaihind, aged about 39 years, Occ. Business, r/o. 1-5- 387/4., Ambedkar Nagar, Old Alwal, Secunderabad.
4. Konduru Vijaya Lakshmi, D/o. K. Lakshmaiah, aged About 41 years, Occ.
Business, rlo. 1-5-3141212, Suryanagar Colony, Near Bethany Schoot, Ambedkar Nagar, Old Alwal, Secunderabad.
5. G.Prasad, S/o. G. Eswar, aged about 49 years, Occ. Business, rto. 2-5-13, Balaji Rice lvlilla, Macha Bolaram, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. DANTU VENKATA RAMANA SARMA
Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
\
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE K. LAKSF MAN
CIIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4179 Ci 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
f{ealci Mr.D.V.Ramana Sarma. leamed co insel fbr the petr trone r 1.. t his Civil Revision Perition is fiied seeking a , ilection to the lealned Il Additionat Senior Civil Judge, Malkajli ii. Medchal - Malkajgiri District, to dispose of O.S.No.2145 of 2t) .Z filed by the petitioner against respondents fbr declaration of title .nd permanent injr-urction. in accoldance with law. as expeditioustl' rs possibte by fixing somc time frame
3. Perusal of the record would reveal that the peti :oner has flled the aloresaid suit in O.S.No.2l45 of 2022 against I e respondents secking declaration of title and permanent injun,: icn. It is the specific contention of the petitioner that respondent I o. I was set e-r parte tn the year 2023 itself and he has filed ar Interlocutory Application uirle LA.No.908 of 2024 before the lear red trial Court seelii.g to ser aside the said ex parte order antl c.nit rrirn to a- contest the said suit. Though the said I.A. was flled in the year 2024,leamed trial Court is not disposing the said I.A. anci also the said suit, in accordance with law, as expeCitiousli as possible. 4 . During the course of hearing, it is also brought to the notice of this Court that defendant Nos.2 to 5 in the said suit were also set ex parte. They have not liled any application to set aside the said e-r parte ord,er. Therefore. petitioner seeks a direction to thc lcarned trial Clourt to dispose of the said I.A. by fixing tinie fiame
5. Perusal of the piaint filed by petitioner herein would reveal tlrat petitioner - plaintiff was aged about 54 years, r,vhile respondent No.l - defendant No.l was 73 years old as on the date of tiling of the said suit. They are now aged 57 years and 76 lears old respectively. They are senior Citizens. The suit is for declaration of title and perrnanent injunction. The year 1999 was observed as "lnternationai Year of Older Persons". In vier.v of the "National Policy fbr Older Persons" adopted by the Govemment of lndia, the erstwhile High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad issued a Circular vide ROC.No.4790/19991OP Cell-E. dated 02.11.1999
j directing all the Judicial Officers in the State to identi i'and dispose of rnatters in rvhich persons above "65 years" of aP( ':lre involved, on priorit,v basis. Suhsecluentl-v,-, erstwhile the High (1, trrl of Andhra Pradesh issucd CircLrlars vide ROC.No.3465/Il i2003, dated 05.12.2003, ROC.No.l230/OI'} Cell-E/2005,, dated .l r08.2005 and ROC.No.3465 lt-.-l 12003, dated 14. 12.2011 and the Iigh Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for tl.re States of Telangar- L and Andhra Pradesh vidc Circular in ROC.No.5226lOP Cell- l/2014, dated 20.12.2014, in which specitic instructions are issued r ; give prioriry to the cases relating to senior citizens for the expec i ious disposal. in the light of the same, noticc to respondent No.1 -_ < ;fendant No.l is ri aived of bf irivoking pou'cr cf this Court under' / rtrcle - 227 ol' the Constitution of India.
6. In vieu' of the aforesaid discussion, this ( ivil Revision Petition is disposcd of directing learned II AdditiorLr I Senior Civil Judge, Malkajgiri, Medchal Malkajgiri District. ir dispose of I.A.No.908 of 2024 filed by respondent No.l tc, set aside the { ( forfeiture ordcr dateci ).i.06.2.023 passed in O.S.Nc, 1145 of 2022, strictll in accordance with larv. AS expeditiously AS possible. prel-erably rvithirr a period of one ( I ) month frorn the date ol reccipt of a copy o1'tlris ordcr. l-'urthcr, leamcd trial Court shall inirke an cndearour to disposc of the said suit in O.S.No.2l45 ol 2022. in accordancc u ith law, as expeditiously as possible As a scclLre[ thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if an1 in thc ('ivil Rcr' ision Petition shall stand closed. Tl.rere shall be no ordcr as to costs SD/- A.JAYASREE ASSISTANTREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 The ll Additional Senior Civil Judge, Malkajigiri, Malkajigiri Court Comptex, Malkajigiri-Medchal Drstrict.
2. One CC to SRl. DANTU VENKATA RAMANA SARMA Advocate IOPUC]
3. Two CD Copies PK/PSLg pending 1\ \ A lz' n
HIGH COURT DATED:21 11112025 CRP.No.4179 ot 2025 lr,l z ..<. \.+ ' :.' t)r . ''.'. j r)ii rl
- ., ,r:l_t CIVIL REVISION PEITITION IS DISPOSED OF ]IRECTING THE TRIAL COURT DISPOSE OF THE IA.NO.I 08 OF 2024IN OS.NO.2145 OF 2022 WITHIN A PERIOD OF r1 119 MONTH FROM THE DATE OF RECEIPT OF COPY OF 'HIS ORDER. o) % \ ,,6 ; tHES t' *