Telangana High Court

CRP/4059/2025 of Pilli Venkata Ramana Vs Pilli Sandeep on 14 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4059 OF 2025 Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order passed in

I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4059 OF 2025

Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order passed in O.S.No. 1216 of 2022 on the file of the Court of the lV Additional District &

Sessions Judge, Medchal Malkajgiri District at Kushaiguda.

Between:

1. Pilli Venkata Ramana, S/o. Late Seetharamaswamy, Age: 75 years, Occ:

Agriculturist, R/o.3-3-69, Sharada Nagar, Ramanthapur, Medchal Malkajgiri District - 500 039.

2. Pilli Seshu Ramana, W/o. Pilli Venkata Ramana, Age: 70 years, Occ:

Household, R/o.3-3-69, Sharada Nagar, Ramanthapur, Medchal Malkajgiri District - 500 039

3. Pilli Srinivas, S/o. Pilli Venkataramana, Age: 43 years, Occ: Private Service, R/o.3-3-69, Sharada Nagar, Ramanthapur, Medchal Malkajgiri Dist. - 500 039.

...REVlSlON PETITIONERS/DEFENDANTS No.1 to 3

AND

1. Pilli Sandeep, S/o. Pilli Venkata Ramana, Age'. 47 years, Occ: Business, R/o.H.No.13-226, Bharathpuri Colony, Medipally, Medchal-Malkajgiri Dist., Hyderabad - 500 098 Presently R/o. 3-3-69, Sharada Nagar, Ramanthapur, Medchal Malkajgiri Dist., Hyderabad- 500 039.

...RESPONDENT No.1/PLAINTIFF

2. The Sub-Registrar, Uppal Medchal-Malkajgiri District - 500 039.

3. The Sub-Registrar, Bhongir Yadadri-Bhongir District - 508 116.

4. The Sub-Registrar, Molhkur, Yadadri-Bhongir District. - 508 277.

...RESPONDENTS No.2 to 4/DEFENDANTS No.4 to 6

(Respondent No.2 to 4 are nol necessary parties to this CRP)

lA NO: 2 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an interim direction directing the Learned Civil Court lV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Medchal Malkajgiri District, at Kushaiguda to dispose of OS

No.1216 of 2022 within 2 months.

Counsel for the Petitioners: Mr. Akella Sreenivas Rao Counsel for the Respondent: None Appeared The Court made the following: ORDER

r

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

CryIL REVISIO N PETITION No.4059 OF 2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER:

Heard Mr. Akella Sreenivasa Rao, learned counsel lor the petltroners.

2. Defendant Nos.1 to 3 in O.S. No. l2l6 of 2022 pending on the file of IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Medchal - Malkajgiri District at Kushaiguda, frled the present revision under Article - 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a direction to the trial Court to dispose of the said suit in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.

3. Respondent No.1 filed the aforesaid suit for partition and separate possession against the petitioners and respondent Nos.2 to 4 herein. It is stated in the present revision that the petitioners herein have already filed an application under Order - VII, Rule - 11 (a) of CPC for rejection of ptaint. There is no cause of action in the plaint. Petitioner Nos.l and 2 are 75 and 70 years respectively and they are senior citizens. Petitioner No.1 underwent operation on four occasions, and also fifth is Neurosurgery. They are totally dependants -- ) ti l. Rt, No .l)i.i rji t( ti on the suit schedule properties. Even then the tr i I Court is not disposing of the said suit in accordance with lau,

4. Perusal ol the plaint filed by respondent No I herein wouid reveal that petitioner No.l - defendant No. I was agec rbout 69 ycars, while petitioner No.2 - defendant No.2 was 63 years rr on the date of filing of the said suit. They are now aged 72 year and 66 lears respectively. They are senior Citizens. The suit is ,,r partition and separate possession of suit schedule properlies. -l'ht year' [999 was observecl as "lnternational Year of Older Persons" [n r iew, ol' the "National Polic;' lbr Older Persons" aciopted by the iovernment of India, the erstwhile High Court o1-Andhra Pradesr at Hyderabad issucd a Circular vide ROC.No.4790l1999lOP Cell-E. dated 02.11.1999 directing all the Judicial Officers in the -(iate to identily and dispose of mattcrs in which persons above "65 rt ars'' ofagc are involved, on pliority basis. Sutrsequently, erstwhile tl r High Court of Andhra Pradesh issued Circulars vide ROC.No.3465 I -112003, dated 05.12.2003, ROC.No.1230lOP Cell-E12005, dated -0.08.2005 and ROC.No.3465 lF.-|12003, dated 14. 12.2011 and thc {igh Courr of Judicature at Hydcrabad for the States of Telangr r a and Andhra Pradcsh vide Circular in ROC.No.5226lOP Ccl ,E/2014. dated , KL.., CRP No4059o12025 20.12.2014, in which specihc instructions are issued to give priority to the cases relating to senior citizens for the expeditious disposal' In the light ol the same, notice to respondent No.l - plaintiff is waived of by invoking power of this Court under Articte - 227 of the Constitution of India.

5. In view of the aforesaid discussion, this Civil Revision petition is disposed of directing I V Additionat District anc Sessions Judge, Medchal - Malkajgiri District at Kushaiguda, to dispose of O'S' No.1216 of 2022 in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible' In the circumstances of the cases, there shall be no order as to costs' As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the revision shall stand closed. SD/- MOHD.ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR o //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Kam/PSL .1. The lV Additional District & sessions Judge, Medchal Malkajgiri District at Kushaiguda.

2. One CC to Mr. Akella Sreenivas Rao, Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CD Copies .-.-.-----------

HIGH COURT DATED:1 411112025

ORDER

CRP.No.4059 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE CRP ,rut :: tJ

,.)il 0 \i'j ,') \.'. .\: "/ & I ) _..:.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead