CRP/4060/2025 of Mrs. Anusha Pudota Vs Avinash Pudota on 14 November 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:4060 OF 2025

Petition under Aflicle 227 of Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order passed in FCOP.No.8SS of 2022 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Family Court at Malkajgiri.

Between:

Mrs. Anusha Pudota, Wo. P. Avinash, D/o. Dasari Gnana Sundara Rao, Age: 27

years, Occ: Software , R/o. 45-604/110, Road No. 5, M.J. Colony, Moula-Ali, Hyderabad - 500 040.

...PetitionerrPetitioner

AND

Avinash Pudota, S/o. P.M. Francis, Age: 31 years, Occ: PvL Service, Christian, R/o. H.No.4-4-83l1/B, Teja Madhuri Nilayam, 1/1, Chandramouli Nagar, Guntur - 5220O7 (A.P)

And also

R/o. 26101, Thornidgedr, Grand Blanc, Michigan, U.S.A.

...RespondenURespondent

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Hon'ble Principal District J udge-cum-Judge, Family Court, Malkajgiri to decide the FCOP. No.855/2022 without clubbing with the FCOP No. 6351221 fled by the respondent.

Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. Sumalatha, counsel representing Mr. C.M.R. Velu Counsel for the Respondent: None Appeared The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

CIvIL REVISION

ON No.4060 oF 202s

ORAL If,RDER:

H,:ard Ms. Sumalatha, learned counsel representing Mr. c.M.R.

Velu, leerrned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The petitioner herein is the wife and the respondent is her husband. The petitioner has filed a petition vide FCop No.g55 of 2022 unrler Section - l0 (x) of ttre Divorce Act, lg69 against the respondent - husband seeking dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty. The respondent - husband has already filed a petition vide FCOP Nc,.635 of 2021 under secrion - l0 (l) (x) to (ix) of the Divorce Act, seeking dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty. He is resident c,f USA. The respondent herein has entered appearance in FCOP No.855 of 2022. He has also fiied a petition vide FCop No.635 o. 2021 against the petitioner herein seeking dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty. In the said FCop, he has filed a memo seeking clubbing of both the FCops for joint trial. on that, learned Fnmily court is adjourning the matter. Therefore, the petitioner herein is seeking a direction to learned Family court to

KLJ

CRP No.4060 of2025

dispose of FCOP No.855 of 2022 filed by her seeking dissolution of mafflage.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the petitioner has filed the aforesaid FCOP No.855 of 2022 against the respondent seeking dissolution of marriage. The respondent herein has already filed a petition vide FCOP No.635 of 2021 seeking the very same relief on the very same ground.

4. There is no provision in Civil Procedure Code for clubbing of aforesaid two FCOPs, at the most, learned Family Court can consolidate both the said petitions and decide the same. The petitioner is seeking disposal of FCOP filed by her against her husband seeking dissolution of marriage.

5. Admittedly, both the FCOPs filed by both the parties are for dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty. The disputes 'between the petitioner and the respondent aie matrimonial disputes.

When the respondent is staying in USA, learned Family Court can interact and conduct conciliation virtually or refer the matter to Mediation, so that both the parties can appear before the Mediator virtually and settle the disputes amicably.

-)

KLJ

CRP No.4060 of2025

6. During the course of hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Cou:I that FCOP No.855 of 2022 filed by the petitioner is coming up for ar,luments, while FCOP No.635 of 2021 filed by the respondent

- husbanri was dismissed for default and on the application filed by the respondent it was restored. In the light of the same, the petitioner has to request learned Family Court to dispose of FCoP No.855 of 2022

or to consider the request made by the respondent to consolidate both the aforesaid FCoPs and dispose of the same. on such request is being marle, learned Family Court shall consider the same and dispose of the rrforesaid FCoPs strictly in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.

7. With the aforesaid observations, this Civil Revision Petition is accordingly disposed of. [n the circumstances of the cases, there shall be no order as to costs As ir sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the revision shall stand closed.

SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL

DEPUTY REGISTRAR

L-

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1 The Judgye, Famity Court at Malkajgiri.

2. One CC to Mr. C.M.R. Vetu, Advoiate

3. Two CD 3opies

Kam/PSL

Yt^( '

loPUCl

SECTION OFFTCER

I

I

I

I

I

I

i

!

I

i

j

HIGH CCIURT

DATED:1411112025