CRP/4097/2025 of Dam.BalaMani Vs Gongalla Kamalamma @ Ramulamma (died) on 14 November 2025

1.

2.

3.

4. ,E o. ANO

1.

2. a

4. A

6.

- _:.?:::,-,.iE:

7. B.VijayaLakshmi,,w/o.B.VenkatReddy, Age: 50 yeirrs, Occ: Housewrfe, R/o.H.No. 1 2-2-338,Bandlaguda,Ayyappa Colony, LB.Nag ar-068. B. Gopa.Sujatha, D/o. late. SathiReddy, Age 47 yee r:;, Occ: Housewife, R/o.H.No.46-226, B.S.Nagar, HMT.Road, Chintal,Quthr bullapur-055.

9. Chirolla.Lahshmi, W/o.C.SekharReddy, D/o.Late.SatriReddy, R/o.H.No.9- 95/2 1, JyothiColony, BalajiNagar vi,Shameerpet-O87 10 Dara.BalReddy, s/o. Late. RajiReddy, Age: 55 years, C)cc Govt.Employee, R/o. Yapral village, Malkajgiri Mandal, tvledchal dist. .1 1. D NagiReddy, s/o. Late. RajiReddy, Age: 52 years, Ocr:: Govt.Employee, R/o Yapral village, MalkajgirilMandal, Medchal dist

12. Palla. Sushila, w/o. SwamyReddy, Age: 68 yearsr, Occ: Housewife, R/o.H.No.30-225, Opp.Govt.School, Old Sfilguda, Nererirnet, I'rlalkajgiri.

13. Dara. MallaReddy. s/o. Late. SathiReddy, Age.77 years, Occ: Business, '14. Dara.PapiReddy, s/o. Late. SathiReddy, Age77 years, Oc;c. Business,

15. Dara.SavitriDevi, w/o. late. Janard han Reddy, Age. 55 ye ars, Occ: Housewife, 1 6. Rajitha, D/o.late. JanardhanReddy, Age:32 years, Occ. l)vt. Employee,

17. Radhika, D/o. late JanardhanReddy, Age:30 years, Occ. Student,

18. Supriya, D/o.late.JanardhanReddy, Age: 25 years, Occ: Situdent, 13 to 18 R/o.Yapral village, Malkajgiri lVlandal, Medchal.l\,,lalkalgiri dist ...RESPONDENTS/DEFEit\IDANTS [4,5 & 9-19] lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c rcurnstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cotrrr may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in OS.NO.279I201 2 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPLE DISTRICT ANd SESSIONS JUDGE, IMEDCHAL MALKAJGIRI AT KUSHAIGUDA pending disposal of civil revision petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Order 39 Rule 'l & 2 CPC praying thal ir the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Courl may be pleased to grant Ad-interim injunction not to alienate the sctte,dule mentioned suit property and not to create gift or mortgage any type of settlement deeds till disposal of suit for partition on the file of PRINCIPLE DISTI CT and SESSIONS JUDGE. IUEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI AT KUSHAIGUDA in OS NO 279/2017. SCHEDULE OF THE PROPERTY All that the agricultural Iand in Sy.Nos.102 extent l.22gts, Sy.No.'1 03/B extent Ac.1.00gts and 120/B extent Ac.2.35 gts, total extent Ac.4 17gts, situated at Yapral Village, Malkajgiri Mandal, Ir4edchal District lormerly known as Rangareddy district is bounded by: N orth South East West Jawharnagar village bound ary Agricultural land in Part Sy.No.103,119, 20 & 125 Jawharnagar Village boundary Agricultural land in Part Sy.No.103,'1 19, 20 & 125

'i:-{ Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri B. Devadas Counsel for the Respondents: None Appeared The Court made the following: ORDER

. r"4:+3?sf ' : ri HON'BLE SRI JTJSTTCE K. LAKSHM- \\ CIVll, ItEVISION PETITION No.4097 OI-_2025 OITI)},R: Ileard Sri tl. [)cvaclas, lcamed counsel for the pt-titioncrs. f . l'his rcr ision is llled under Article 227 of tl.r,-' ( onstitution ol- Incliir seeking a dircction to the Principal District & lit:ssions -ludgc' Mcdchal l\4alkajgiri District, at Kushaiguda. to disposc of O.S.No.279 o1' 2017 in accordance with law as expeditiously as possi[-'lg.

3. 'l'hc pctitioners herein are defendants Nos. .l and 6 to tl. Rcspondent Nos.l to 5 herein filed the aforesaid r;trit a-eainst tlte petitioners and rcspondeut Nos.6 to l8 for perpetual injturctior-r and scpalatc possessit'rn of thc sr.rit schedule property' Thc s rid sLrit postcd lbl rrial 'l hc pctitioners filed the present petition seel ing e>:pcditious disposal o1'the said suit contending that during pend,:rcr' ,rf the said suit. respondent Nos.6 to 1S/defendants in the said sr it are disposing of tlre suit schcclule propefty. They have already dispc,sed of part ol the suit schedtrlc propefty. Therefore, they are seekilg a direction ttr the trial Court kr disposc of the aforesaid suit in accorclance rvith lau' as cxpeditiously as possible.

c61

4. Admittedly, the petitioners herein are defendants Nos.l,3, 6 to 8 in the said suit. During the course ofhearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the respondent Nos.l to 5 /plaintiffls in the said suit did not file any application restraining the def'endants including the petitioners herein from alienating, encumbering and changing the physical leatures of the suit schedule propertr in any manner ln the absence of the same, the petitioners herein cannot contend that other defendants are trying to dispose olthe suit schcdule propefty during the pendency of the said suit. They can contend that any alienation during the pendency of the suit is hit bi, doctrine of /rs pendens in terms of Section 52 ol the 'l'ranslbr ol Property Act, 1882 (for short, 'the TP Act') Instead of doing so, they havc filed the present revision seeking a direction to the trial Court to dispose of the said suit as expeditiously as possible.

5. Therefore, the petitioners are not entitled tbr any reliel-, this revision fails. It is liable to be dismissed and accordingly dismissed Consequently, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this revision shall stand closed. SD/- .cH NDRA SEKHAR RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

to'', . -n" Principal District & Sessions Judge' Kushiguda' , b;;'ic1; Sri B Devadas' Advocate toPucl AM. 3 Two CD CoPies EZ Kam,PSL Medchal-Malkalgiri District at

HIGH COURT DATED:1411112025

ORDER

CRP.No.4097 ot 2025 DISMISSING OF THE CRP /' 4Fl tlE SIA \ TC 14: q(.4+t o U 2 5 t{0lt zui ( Pz a

! I tl l I I ! l I t.