Telangana High Court
SA/634/2008 of B. Maheshwar Reddy Vs Katepaga Yadagiri on 13 November 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO Appeal under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the Judgment and Decree dated
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
Appeal under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the Judgment and Decree dated 01-04-2008 passed in A.S.No.73 of 2006 on the file of the Court of the I Additional District Judge at Mahabubnagar, preferred against the Judgment dated 25-07-2006
passed in O.S.No.33 of 1993 on the file of the Cou( of the Senior Civil Judge, Mahabubnagar.
Between:
B. Maheshwar Reddy, S/o. Janardhan Reddy, Age:50 years, Occ: Cultivation R/o. Ranga Reddyguda, Balanagar Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.
..,APPE LLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTI FF
AND
1. Katepaga Yadagiri, S/o. Late Pentaiah, Age:51 years, Occ: Retired Government Employee R/o. H.No.5-20, Shadnagar Village and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.
2. Katepaga Lalitha (died)
3. Katepaga Yadamma, D/o. Late Pentaiah, Age:37 years, Rl/o. H,No.5-20, Shadnagar Village and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.
4. Katepaga Pushpamma @ Kusuma Kumari, D/o. Late Pentaiah, Age:35 years, Rl/o. H.No.5-20, Shadnagar Village and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. Mandhata SLK Srutha Keerthi, counsel representing Sri V.L.N. Gopala Krishna Murthy Counsel for the Respondents: Sri P.V. Vidyasagar The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
;/
SECOND APPEAL NO: 634 OF 2008
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE
SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
S.A.No.634 OF 2008
JTJDCMT]N T (per Hon ble Sri Justice P.Sum Koshy)
1'oday, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.Mandhata SLK Srutha Keer-thi, leamed counsel representing the appellant, has produced a withdrawal letter executed by Mr.B.Maheshwar Reddy, s/o B.Janardhan Reddy, duly signed by Mr.B.Maheshu,ar Reddy and also counter-signed by Ms.Mandhata SLK Srutha Keerthi. indicating that the appellant does not intend to pursue the second appeal any further and wants to withdraw the sSnre 'l-he said withdrawal letter dated 28.10.2025 is taken on record
2.
In view of the said contention and authorization letter given by the appellant, the second appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
As a conscquence, the .iudgment and decree of the first appellate coufl stands conflrrned. 'lhere shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand c Iosed.
//TRUE COPYi/
The I Additional District Judge at Mahabubnagar (
The Senior Civil Judge, Mahabubnagar.
SD/- V. KAVITH
DEPUry REGIS
SECTION OFFICER
th
rds, if any)
/
To,
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Kam,l
One CC to Sri V.L.N. Gopala Krishna Murthy, Advocate [OPUC]
One CC to Sri P.V. Vidyasagar, Advocate [OPUC]
Two CD Copies
SA
t
w
HIGH COURT
DATED:1311112025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
SA.No.634 of 2008 THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN q 11[{:B?tl?fi PATC:: SIA HE
(l-j * L l, it