CRLA/1000/2017 of The State of Telangana Vs Ramavath , Lambadi Sreenu on 12 November 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

Appeal under Section 378(3) & (1)of Cr.P.C., praying that the High Court may be pleased to present this lvlemorandum of Criminal Appeal against the judgment in S.C No.20412013 on the tile of the Principal Sessions Judge lt/ledak at Sangareddy dt 26 I 2013.

Between:

The State of Telangana, rep. by The Public Prosecutor High Court at Hyderabad.

APPELLANT/COMPLAINANT

AND

1. Ramavalh @ Lambadi Sreenu, S/o Oopla, aged 27 years, Caste Larnbada, Occ Labour,

2. Vislawath Lambadi Devi Singh, S/o Kheerya, aged 37 years, Caste Larnbada, Occ Labour, (Both are R/o. Kandi Thanda, H/o. Kandi Village, Sangareddy Mandai RESPODENTS/RESPON DENTS

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 1000 OF 2017

Counsel for the Appellant :

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED

The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

\

'I'IIE II()N'RT-Ti SRI JT]STICI' K. LAKSHMAN

ANt)

TIIE HON'I}I-I.- SRI .'T-JSTICE \/AKITI RAMAKRISHNA IIEDDY

('RIi\llN,,\L APP!-AL No.l000 of 2017

JUDCMEN'l-: rt'tr tt.tt hlL.\ri./u:rit.e K.l.,lithrun)

Statc plcltrled the lrresent appeal under Section 37lt(i)

& ( I ) ol'the ('oclc ol-Criminal Procedure, 1973 challcnging the Judgrnenr (larc(l 16.08.1013 in S.C.No.204 of 2013 passed by the learnecl l)rrncipal Sessions Juclge, Medak at Sangareddy.

l/ide lhc inrpuurrcd .ludsment dated 26.08.2013, learned trial Courl acquittccl thc respondents/accused.

2.

State ple lcrrccl the said appcal along with an application lirle Crl.A.M.P.No.l04:l oI'2011 to condone the delay ol' 1370

days in prescntinr the appeal. l/ide order dated 25.10.2017, this Courl disrrrissed the said application filed by the State to condone tlre said clelay lrolcling that no explanation IS

Ibrthcorning as lo why it took nearly three years for prelbrring an appeal, aficr recei',,ing sanction fiont the Government and in the abserrco ol- any explanation, such delay cannot be condoned. This Court also dismisscd Crl.A.M.P.No.2045 of

&

2

't

20 17 llled by the St?rte seeking leave to prel'er tlie present appeal. Thus, the appeal was l)ot eveu adrnitted.

3.

[:r,cn thcn, Registry called lbr thc records lionr thc learned trial Court, prcpared paper book and kept the sarnc irr thc buncllc. Thereibre, thc rnattcr is listed 1br hcaring.

4.

In the light olthe sarne, this appcal is disnrissecl.

As a sccluel thereto, misccllaneous applications, il- any, pending in tlrc Crirninal Appeirl sha.ll stand closccl.

SD/. T.VIJAY KUMAR

EPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal Sessions Judge, Medak at Sangareddy. (with records)

2. One CC to THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Ccurl for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad. [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies

ASR/PSI-

l

To,

P

HIGH COURT

DATED:1211112025