Telangana High Court
CRLA/989/2017 of The State of Telangana Vs Mudedla Rajaiah on 12 November 2025
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 989 OF 2017 Appeal under Section 378(3) & (1) of Cr.P.C.,
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAO
WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 989 OF 2017
Appeal under Section 378(3) & (1) of Cr.P.C., praying that the High Court may be pleased to present this Memorandum of Criminal Appeal against the judgment in S.C.No 92 of 2012 on the file of the lll Additional District and Sessions Judge, Karimnagar, dt. 18 1.2013
Between:
The State of Telangana, rep. by The Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.
AND
Mudedla Rajaiah, S/o. Mallaiah, Aged 32 years, Tenugu, R/o Chinnakomatipalli (v), Jammikunta Mandel.
APELLANT
RESPODENT
Counsel for the Appellant :
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Counsel forthe Respondents: NONE APPEARED
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
T}IE IION'BLE SRI JUS'IICE K. LAKSII \ T\N
AND
THI.] HON'BI,E SRI JUSTICE VAKII'I RAMAKRI:; INA REDDY
CItIMINAL APPEAL No.989 of 2017
JUDGMEN't: /pt t. Ho, htu st. .lt6titt K LLtl.trn,ont State prel-crled the plescnt appeaI undel' S::[ion 378(3)
& ( l ) of the Code o1'Climinal Ploceclure, 1973 cl r llcnging the Judgment dated ltt.0l.20 Ii in S.C.No.92 ol'l()ll passcd by the learned ll Additional District an(l Sessi()r s Juclse at Karirnnagar. Ilide the irnpuunecl Judgntcut datcci I 7.01 .2013, learnecl trial Courl acquitted the les ptrndcrlt/'acc r ls(.(
2.
State pret-crred thc saicl appcal along rvith lr I lpplication vidc Crl.A.M.P.No.2020 o1'2017 to condone ltrc rlr. irv ol'1592
clays in prescnting the appcai. i/iric ordcr clatcrl )ll.l I 20 17, this Court disnrissed thc said application filccl bl he State to condone the said delay holding that no c\l) lnati()n is lorthcoming as to why therc rvas such a dclav rr liling the appeal and in the absence 01'any reasonablc expla I rtion, such delay cannot [.re conclonetl. 'l'his Courl also tlisrrisscc]
CLl.A.M.P.No.202 I of 20 l7 tllecl bv the State seckL {r leave to
(
prefer the prescnt apl)cal. Thus. the appeal was not even admitted
3. Evcn then, Registry called lor the records frorn l.hc learned trial Court, ltreparcd papcr book and kcpt the sarne in the bundlc. Thcrefbrc, the rnatter is listecl for hearing.
4.
In thc light o['thc sanre, this appeal is dismissed.
As a scclucl thercl.o, uriscollancclus applications, if any, pending in thc C'rirrrinal AltlLeal shall stancl closcd.
SD/- N.SRIHARI
DEPUry REGISTR
//TRUE COPY//
ECTION OFFICER
To
ASR/PSL
1. The lll Additional District & Sessions Judge, Karimnagar
2. One CC to THE pUBLt(
Telangana, Hyderabad fJrryttt"oR'
High court for the state of
3. Two CD Copies
t-W
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 211112025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
CRLA.No.989 ot 2017 DISMISSING THE APPEAL l Ui:L frm 'l
-..i ..'// \.:'t.. L \ .t/ 1-t ,l -,';t.,'1.,"-'t --::-..:'-=/' C IW