CRLA/1038/2017 of The State of Telangana Vs Chilumula Prabhakar on 12 November 2025

[ 34s4 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

WEDNESDAY, IHE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEIMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 1038 OF 2017

Appeal filed under Section 378(3) & (1) of Cr.P.C against the judgment dated 17.09.2014 passed in S C.No.26312013 on the file of the court of the lll Additional Sessions Judge, Karimnagar.

Between:

The State of Telangana, rep. by The Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.

...AppellanUComplainant

AND

1. Chilumula Prabhakar, S/o, Anlaiah, R/o. Cheerlavancha Village, Siricilla I\tla ndal

2. Chilumula Anjaiah, S/o. Ralaiah, Occ Retired Veterinary Officer, R/o.

Cheerlavancha Village, Siricilla Mandal.

3. Manuwada Yellavva, Wo. Mallaiah. R/o. Cheerlavancha Village, Sircilla Mandal.

4. Chilumula Sathavva, Wo Anjaiah, R/o. Cheerlavancha Village, Siricilla Mandal

5. Malyala Aruna, W/o. Ramaswamy, R/o. H.No.9-5-266, Markandeyanagar, Karirnnagar,

6. Sathani Anusha, Wo. Naresh Kumar @ Narsimhulu, R/o. H.No.2-2-1251, Gandhi Nagar, Vemulavada.

7. Sathani Naresh Kumar @ Narsimhulu, S/o. Lingaiah, Occ RMP Doctor, R/o

H. No.2-2-'1 251, GandhiNagar, Vemulavada ... Respondents/Accused.

...RespondenUAccused

:.'=".':r*

Counsel for the Appellant : Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Respondent : ----- The Court delivered the following:

:.' f ery

',t

.

,'/

/

THE HON'BLIJ SRI JUSTICE K. I,AKSHMAN

AND

THE HON'BI.,E SRI .ITJS'I I(]E V,,\KTTI RANIAKRISHNA ITB,DDY

CRTTUINAL APPEAL No.l038 ot 201'1

JT]DGNIENT: (l\'r IIL'n hlt Sn.tu t, t K.l.uL'ltnart State prelerred the prcserrt appeal undcr Section 378(3)

& (1) olthe Code o1'Clrirninal Ploccdurc, 1973 challenging the .ludgment dated 17.09.20t,1 in S.C.No.26i ol- 20l3 passed by the learned III Additional Sessions -lr-rclgc at Karirnnagar. I,'irlc the impugned Judgurent dated 17.09.20 14, lcarncd tria[ Couft acquitted the respondents/accuscd

2.

State preforrccl the saicl appcirl along u,ith an application vide Crl.A.M.P.No.2l33 ol' 20 l7 to condone thc delav of 945

days ln presenting the appeal. ltide ordet dated 25.10.2017, this Court dismissed the said application filed by thc State to condone the saicl clclay holding that no explanation IS

forlhcoming as to why thcre rvas such a delay ln liling the appeal and in the absence of any reasonablc cxplanation, such delay cannot be conclonecl. This Court also dismissed (

Cr1.A.M.P.No .2134 of 20 I 7 frled by the State sccking leavc to '!

pref'er the prescut appeal. Thus, the appcat ivas tro[ evctl atlmitted.

Evcn theu, Registry callecl lbr the rc.: rrds tion-r thc lealncd tlral Cour1, prcpared ltaper book ancl l. i pt thc siiute rn the bundle. Thereforc, tl-re mattel is listecl [br lrr.r ring

4.

In l.hc lighL ol-the same. this appcal is disl issed As a sequcl tltercto. ntisccllancor-rs ultp1 i atirrns. i[' an1,, pending in the Criminal Appeal shall stancl clc,sc .l SD/. N.SRIHARI

I EPUTY REGISTRAR

G

To,

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

'1 . The lll Additional Sessions Judge, Karimnagar. (Wrth r :cords, if any)

2. The Judicial tt/agistrate of First Class, Siricialla.

3 The Station House Officer, Siricillla Police Station

4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, State of Telangana ligh Court Buildings, at Hyderabad (OUT)

5. Two CD Copies

DL/PSL

I

I

{

HIGH COURT

DATED:1211112025