Telangana High Court
CRLRC/818/2025 of Ganagoni Sudhakar Vs Gurram Raju on 11 November 2025
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 818 OF 2025 Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 438 and 442 of BNSS aggrieved by the order dated
132s71
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 818 OF 2025
Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 438 and 442 of BNSS aggrieved by the order dated 1411012025, passed in Crl.Appeal No. 42 of 2025, on the file of the Court of the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, at Rajanna Siricilla, which was preferred against the Judgment in C.C.No. 689 of 2019, dated 12.08.2025, on the file of the Court of the ll Addl Junror Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Siricilla.
Between:
Ganagoni Sudhakar, S/o. Laxmi Narayana, Aged 37 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H. No.'l-2011 , Thangallapalli Village and Mandal, Rajanna-Siricilla District.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. Gurram Raju, S/o. Gurram Narayana, Occ. Labourer (Dubai Returned) R/o.
H.No. 1/'lA, Obulapoor Village, Thangallapally Mandal, Rajanna-Siricilla District
2. The State of Telangana,, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad
...RESPONDENTS
lA NO:1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 430 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of Judgment passed in C.C.No. 699 of 2019, dated 12.08.2025, passed by the Court of ll Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-ll Addl.
Judicial Magistrate of First Class, at Rajanna-Siricilla, pending disposal of Criminal Revision Case, in the, interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. THIMMARAJU RAMCHANORA RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI
CRIMINAL REVISION CAS E No.818 ol1t025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Crirninal Revision Case is filed b1, the petitioner aggrieved by the order dated 14 10.2025 passed in Oriminal Appeal No42 of 2025 arising out of C.C.No 699 of 2019 oi.r the file of the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, ;lajanna Sircilla (for shotl the learned Sessions Judge'), whereby the appeal was dismissed for default on account of non-payment of crocess and for n on-p rosecution 02 Heard Sri Thimmaraju Ramchander Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the record 03 Learned counsel for the petitioner subnritted that the learned Sessions Judge has erroneously dismiss,:d the appeal without granting ample opportunity to the petitiorer-appellant to prosecute the same lt is contended that the non-dellosit of process and the absence of the learned counsel on the date r1 hearing were neither deliberate nor wanton, but due to oversighl lt is further submitted that the petitioner has good grounds to .;ucceed in the Criminal Appeal and he is ready and willing to depor; . the process I I i \
Hence, he prayed that one more opportunity may be granted to the petitioner to prosecute the appeal on merits
04. ln view of the facts and crrcunrstances of the case including the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, and considering the fact that the present appeal arises out of proceedings under the Negotiable lnstruments Act, this Court is of the considered opinion that the learned Sessions Judge, instead of dismissing the appeal for default, ought to have passed a conditional order. ln that vrew of the matter. the impugned order is liable to be set aside and the same is hereby set aside Consequently, the petitioner is directed to deposit the process within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Upon such deposit, the learned Sessions Judge shall restore the appeal to file and dispose of the same, in accordance with law
05. With the above observations. this Criminal Revision Case is disposed of Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed SD/- P GOWRI SHANKAR DEPUW REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER The lAdditional District and Sessions Judge, at Rajanna Siriiilla,
To,
2 The ll Addl Junror Civil Judge-cum-ll Additional Judicrzri lv'lagistrate of First CIass, Siricilla.
3. The State of Telangana,, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Oourt for the State of Telangana, l lYderabad 4OneCCtoSRI.THIMIVARAJURAMCHANDRARAOAcv'rcateIOPUCI 5 Two CD CoPies I I I'PK/ABK
HIGH COURT DATED:1111112025 t \ 1 2 llrU 2025 t I / rf,: -:,"d (.".ir 't ,.' .J
ORDER
CRLRC.No.818 ot 2025 CRIMINAL REVISION CASE IS DISPOSED OF Ia t\\14' l I I I I ! , I i I I I I I I ! I I t i l I l i I I I I I i i