Telangana High Court
CRLP/527/2024 of Thota Raghu Vishnu Kumar Vs The State of Telangana on 10 November 2025
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI IMIN ON NO: 24 Between Thota Raghu_vishnu Kumar, s/o. Thota shiva Kumar, Aged 30 vears. Occ. Government Employee, R/o. Rangapur Village, Nand'igima rvrlrioa, hrng, Reddy
1:
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI
IMIN
ON NO:
Between
Thota Raghu_vishnu Kumar, s/o. Thota shiva Kumar, Aged 30 vears. Occ.
Government Employee, R/o. Rangapur Village, Nand'igima rvrlrioa, hrng, Reddy District.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.4
AND
The State of relangana. Reprgselted by s H.o, Nandigama p.s., Ranga f eddl Dis,trict, Rep. -through the pub.ric prosecutor, stite of relanganr]Hign Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.
Gandla Lakshmi, wo. Gandla Kishore Kumar, Aged 47 years, occ. House wife, R/o. Uppuguda, Kanchanbagh, Hyderabad.-
... RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to QUASH the C.C. No 776 of 2021 on the file of the principal Judicial First class Magistrate, shadnagar, Ranga Reddy District.
l.A. N0: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the lVlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant STAY of alt further proceedings, including stay of arrest of the Petitioner in C C. No. 776 of 2021 on the file of the Principal Judicial First ciass tMagistrate, Shadnagar, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana, pending clisposal of the above Criminal petition.
LA.Nq_lAEZ9Zq:
Gandla Lakshmi, W/o. Gandla Kishore Kumar, Aged 47 years, Occ. House wife, R/o. Uppuguda, Kanchanbagh, Hyderabad.
PetitioneriRespondent/Defacto Complainant ANt)
1 Thota Raghu Vishnu Kumar, S/o. Thota Shiva Kumat', Aged 3O years, Occ.
Governmen: Employee, R/o. Rangapur Village, Nandigama Manda, Ranga Reddy Dtstrtct.
RespondenUPetitiooner/Accused No.4
2. The State of Telangana, Represented by S.H.O, Nandigamf ,S., Ranga_.
Reddy Distri,:t, Rep-. through the Public Prosecutor. State of Telangana, High Court-for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.
RespondenURespondent/Complainant
Petition under Sect!on 482 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the [V1em<;randlnr of Grounds of Criminal Petition. the High Court may be pleasecj to vaczrte the crders dt.12.10112024. in l.A.No. 1 of 2024 in Criminal Petitiorr No.527 of 1'-024. on the file of this Hon'ble of this Hon'ble Court This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Crirninal Petit;on and upon hearing the arguments of Sri OMAR A
PASHA, Advocate ror the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Responderrt No.1 arrd none appeared for the Respondent No. 2
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner-accused No.4 seeking to quash the proceedings against him in c.c.No.776 of 2021 on the file of principar Judicial First class Magistrate, shadnagar, Ranga Reddy District registered for the offences under sections 441, 427, 324, so4 read with 34 of lndian Penal Code.
2. Heard Mr.Omar A.pasha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr.G.sai prasen, learned counsel for the petitioner-accused No.4 and Mr.M.Ramachandra Reddy, learned Additional Public prosecutor for the state. There is no representation on behalf of respondent No.2. perused the record.
3. The case of the prosecution as per de facto complainant in brlef was that on 23.03.2021, petitioner- accused No.4 along with other accused criminally trespassed into complainants land and made fencing in middle of the said land. on 24.03.2021 the petitioner-accused No.4 along with other accused again trespassed into the said land and abused the complainant and her mother in raw who are present there and one of them beat the complainant with a stick resulting which she received injuries on head and hand A case in crime No.78 of 2021 was registered against the accused persons for the offences under Sections 447, 427, 324,504 read with 34 of lndian Penal Code (for short'lPC').
4. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner-accused No.4 is that the petiticner was not present at the scene of offence on the day of incident and he was in training on a daily basis for the whole month of [\4arch from 01.03.2021 to 31 .03.2021. Therefore, no case is made out against the petitioner herein. Hence, he prays to quash the proceedings against the petitioner-accused No.4
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor by placing the instructions submitted by the Inspector of Police received from the Tahsildar, Bandlaguda submits that the genuineness of attendance certificate of Thota Raghu, Pro Naib Tahsildar, who was undergoing training in Bandlaguda Tahsil Office for the period from 01.03.2021 to 31.03.2021, which was issued by Tahsildar, Bandlaguda Mandal on 04.04.2021 is found to be \ ! \
ry correct and genuine. Hence, the proceedings against the petitioner can be quashed.
6. ln view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor and the proceedings of the Tahsildar produced by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, shows that the petitioner-accused No.4 was not present at the scene of offence on the date of incident i.e.23.03.2021 and he has undergone training in Bandlaguda Tahsil office with effect from 01.03.2021 to 30.03.2021 without any reaves. rherefore, the'proceedings against the petitioner-accused No.4 are liabte to be quashed. 7 ' Accordingry, this criminar petition is arowed and the proceedings against fne petitioner/accused No.4 0n the fire of Principar Judiciar First crass Magistrate, shadnagar, Ranga Reddy District, are hereby quashed. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, , shall stand closed. if any DEPUTY REGI G SECTION OFFICER r, Rangareddy District SD/-MOHD.ISMAIL STRAR t I I I ro,
\ry
6. //TRUE COPYII r the State of I I
HIGH COURT DATED:10/1 112A25 ORT}ER CRLP.No.S27 of 2024 1 trt $lqtt ? ( G ( .? oo $c ruu nfi t t Dr', ,r(: ) ALLOWING THIi CTLP r