Telangana High Court
CRP/3981/2025 of M.A.Aziz Khan Vs Mandumula Mallaiah on 7 November 2025
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN CIVIL EVISION P NO: 3981 F 202s Petition under Article 227 ot the Constitution of lndia, praying that in the circumstances stated
[ 3168l
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
CIVIL
EVISION P
NO: 3981
F 202s
Petition under Article 227 ot the Constitution of lndia, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to allow the CRP by directing the learned Junior Civil Judge-cum-JFCM, Chevella, Ranga Reddy District to dispose of 1.A.No.1624t2024 in
1.A.No.1296/2024 in 0.S.No.41812024 pending on its fite, and to pass
1. V,A,4{,., Kfrqn,S/o.M.A.Hafez Khan. aged about 45 years, Occ.Business, R/o.H.No.18-8-221/5, Riyasath Nagar, Opp. SBt Bank, Saidabad, Hyderabad.
...PETtTIONER(S)
AND
1. Mandumula Mallaiah, S/o.late M.Laxmaiah Occ.Agriculture, R/o. H. No.6-55, Proddutur aged about 39 years,
(V), Shankarpally (M), R.R.District.
.RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant police protection to the life and property of the petitioner more particularly the agricultural land admeasuring Ac.3-00 Gts., under Sy.No.240l1/1, situated at Proddutur Village, Shankarpalle Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in complianbe with the ad-interim injunction order dated:23 .09.2024 passed in lA No.129612024
in OS No.4'1812024 by the Junior Civil Judge-cum-JFCM, Chevella, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of C.R.P., and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. MOHD MO|N AHMED QUADRI
Counsel forthe Respondents: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
:
'I'!
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
F 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The petitioner herein had filed a suit in O.S. No.41 8 of 2024 against the respondent for perpetual injunction. He has also filed an lnterlocutory Application vide I.A. No.l296 of 2024 in the said suit seeking temporary injunction . Vide order dated 23.0g.20?-4, learned Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, R.angareddy District at Chevella, granted ad interim temporary injunction in favour of the petitioner till 18.r0.2024. According to the petitioner, learned trial Court extended the said temporary injunction from tirne to time. The said temporary injunction is in subsistence. The respondent herein has already filed counter in the said I.A. and, thus, the pleadings are complete.
3. During pendency of the said I.A. and the suit and also subsistence of said ad interimtemporary injunction, according to the petitioner, the respondent violated the said order willfully and deliberately. Therefore, the petitioner filed an applicatiott vide r.A.
\
KL, J CRP No.398l of2025 No.1624 of 2024 under Section - l5l of C.P.C. seeking a direction to police, Mokila Police Station, to provide police protection to him and his property. Though the said application was filed in october, 2024, the trial Court is not disposing of the same in accordance with law' Thus, there is threat of dispossession of the petitioner by the respondent. Therefore, he is seeking a direction to trial Court to dispose of the said I.A. No.tOZ+ of 2024 in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.
4. As discussed above, the order in I.A. No.l296 of 2024 in O.S. No.4l8 of 2024 was an ex parte order granted by the trial Court on 23.09.2024. If the same was violated, the petitioner has to approach the trial court seeking police aid. Accordingly, he has filed I.A. No. 1624 of 2024 seeking police aid. Even according to learned counsel .for the petitioner, pleadings 'in I.A. No.1296 of 2024 are complete. The respondent has already filed counter. Therefore, the trial Court has to decide injunction petition i.e., I.A. No.1296 of 2024 and, thereafter, the police aid application i.e., I.A. No.1624 of 2024. The said principle was also laid down by this court in Shanagonda
KL, J CRP No.398l of2025 Sampath v. Shanagonda Akhilar, wherein this Court laid down certain guidelines to dispose of applications filed seeking police aid in the orders.
5. In the light of the above discussion, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself, directing the trial Court to dispose of I.A. No.1296 of 2024 in O.S. No.4l8 of 2024 first and thereafter I.A. No.1624 of 2024 as per the guidelines laid down by this Court Shanagonda Sampathr, as expeditiously as possible. In the circumstances of the cases, there shall tre no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if arty, pending in the revision shall stand closed. SD/. AHMED ABDULLA KHAN ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER 1' The Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial First Class Magistratella, Ranga Reddy District at Chevella - 2- one cc to sRr. MOHD MorN AHMED euADRrAdvocate lopucl /w 3. Two CD Copies
To, '. CRP No.2536 of 2024,decided on 09.06.2025
/ / HIGH COURT DATEDiA7n1n025 CRP.No.3981 of 2025 DISPOSE OFF a THE 5 T4 ,c t o 10 iltttt 1w t f Ctrr:(. D
\\ \ I I I b 1/'