CCCA/201/2010 of S. Rami Reddy Vs Jameel A.Hussain on 4 November 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEIV1BER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

l.A.No.1 of 2025

ln/And

CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL NO: 201 OF 2010

Appeal under section 96 of C.P.C against the Judgment and Decree Dated 06-12-2005 made in O.S.No.'14 of 2003 on the file of the Xl Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Fast Track Court, Hyderabad.

Between:

S. Rami Reddy, S/o. Chandra Reddy, Aged about 53 yrs, Occ: Business Rl/o H.No. 4-63, Ghatkesar Village and (M), Ranga Reddy District.

..Appella nUP laintiff

AND

Jameel A Hussain, S/o. Mohammad Bakar Hussain (M-B.Hussain), aged about 50 yrs, Fl/o. H.No. '1 2-13-484, Street No. '1 , Opp Wesley School, Tarnaka, Secunderabad- Permanent R/o. Chaman Bungalow, No. 14, Dada Bhai Road, Andheri (West) Bombay.

... Responde nUDefe ndant

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner/Appellant to withdraw the present Appeal, in the interest of justice.

Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. HARIPRIYA, REPRESENTING

SRI U MURALIDHAR RAO

Counsel for the Respondent: M/s. D. MADHAVA RAO (NOT PRESENT)

The Court made the following: JUDGMENT

THI.] IION'I}I,I' S}tI JUSI'ICE K. LAKS}IMAN

-\ND

'l'llE HON'Bl.l'. Sl{l .ltrSTI('la VAKIl'I RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

INTUI{1.(X t;'l OR\' ,,\PPLI(lAl'lON No.l of 2025

in/antl

('.C].C.,,\. No.20I ot 20l0

,IUDGI'lEN'l': rt',ttt,,:)'t' r,,./,,,r, ., A takhnL,,t

I.A.No l ol'2015 is lilcd by thc petitioner/appellant seekin_li pcrnrission to \\,itl)dtr\\'the appcaI i.e., C'.C.C.A.No.20l ol20 l0

2.

Heard Ms. llaripriva. learned counsel representing Mr'. U.Muralitlhal llao. learned courlsel fbl the appellant. Nonc appears fbr thc respondcnt

l.

'l his appcal is plcterrcd by the appellant challenging thc .judgrnerrt ancl clecrcc rlatcd 20.11.2007 in O.S.No.20 of I996

passed l)y the learncd \ll Senior Civil Judge (Fast Track Courr), City Civil C'ou11. Sccur.rclcrabad. It is a suit fbr speci{lc pcrlbrnrance o1' agrccnrcnt ol-salc clated 17.12.1990 and the sarne was disnrissed by thc trial ('ourt. During pendency of the prcsent appeal, appellant t'iled thc application vide I.A.No. I of 2025

contending that hc- is not interested to pursue the said appeal.

4.

In thc light of the same, I.A.No. I of 2025 is oldered and ('.C.C.A. No.20 I ol 20 l0 is dismisseci as rvithdrau,rr. l'here shall bc no order as to costs.

Misccllaneous applications pencling, il' any, shall stand closcd.

Sd/- T. VIJAY KUMAR

EPUTY REGIST

CTION OFFICER

Fast Track Court,

To,

ABK /Sa

w

,TRUE COPY'

1. The Xl Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Cou Hyderabad:

2. One CC to Sri U Muralidhar Rao, Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to Sri D Madhava Rao, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies

),

I

I

i

I

HIGH COURT

DATED: O4l'1112025