CRLP/1388/2024 of Muddula Rajeswari Vs The State of Telangana on 3 November 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

N/ONDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1388 OF 2024

Between:

1. Muddula Rajeswari, wio Rayamallu, aged about 60 years, occ. Housewife, r/o 1-123 Chendoli, Gollapalli, Ir,4ancherial.

2. Mudduta Rayamallu, s/o Balaiah, aged about 74 years, occ. Nil, rlo 1-123

Chendoli, Gollapalli, Mancherial.

3. Ammu Rajitha, d/o Rayamallu, aged about 37 years, occ. Housewife, r/o 1- 123 Chendoli, Gollapalli, lvlancherial.

4. Damarakonda Vijaya alias Jaya, w/o Ashok Aged about 33 years occ Holusewife, rlo 1-126, Chendoli, Gollapalli, Mancherial..

5. Damarakonda Ashok, s/o Raja lr/allaiah, aged About 56 years, occ. Business, r I o 1 -1 26, Chendoli, Gollapalli, lvlancherial.

6. Muddula lvlallavva, w/o Muddula Ramesh, aged About 40 years, occ.

Housewife, r I o 1 -123, Chendoli, Gollapalli, lvlancherial.

...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOs 3 to 8

The State of Telangana, through S.H.O., Jaipur Police Station, Mancherial District, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, HyderAbad.

Muddula alias Dayala Sirisha, w/o Mahender, aged About 27 years, occ.

Student, rto 4-1118, Chetpalli village, Jaipur [\4andal, Ivlancherial District.

...RESPONDENTs/COMPLAINANT

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to the F.l.R.No. 47 of 2023 of Jaipur Police Station, Mancherial District, and quash the same.

l.A. NO: 1OF 2024

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including the arrest of the petitioners in F.l.R.No. 47 of 2023 of Jaipur Police Station, Mancherial District, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition.

This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri RAVI

SANGAPAKA ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none for the Respondent No. 2.

The Court made the following: ORDER

AND

THI.] HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JLI]/\'.\ DI SRIDEVI

CRIMINAL PETITI ON No.l388 of ). t24

OITDER:

Whcn the lnattcr is taken up lor hc:

lrlg.

learnecl

Aclclitional Public Prosecutor submits that during t t: pendencv of the climinal petition to quash the crime,, charge ; reet has bcen fi lcd and hcnce, the uratter has beconre infructuous Recordins the albresaid subntission, this cr rrinal petirion is disposed of as infructuous. Hou,ever, libcrtr s qranted to petitioner(s) to challenge the charge sheet, ildesirc; so Pending rniscellaneous appiications, il arr.. shall stand c loscd .

SD/. U. SUDHA

ASIi ]TANT REGISTRAR

To,

//TRUE COPY//

' SECTION OFFICER

1. The Judicial First Class Magistrate at Chennur'

2.ThestationHouseOfficer,JaipurPoliceStation,Manci:rialDistrict'

3 One CC to SRl. RAVI SANGAPAKA Advocate IOPUC'

4 Two CCs to the ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR .Iigh Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]

5. Two CD CoPies

HIGH COURT

DATED:03/11/2025

,;fr f