AS/384/2025 of Akkamalla Venkata Rajaiah Vs Yegge Mallesham on 31 October 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

ANI)

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2025

IN/AND

APPEAL SUIT NO: 384 OF 2025

Appeal Under Section 96 R/w. Order 41 Rule 1 of CPC aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated 10-04-2025 in O.S.No. 37 of 2021 on the file of the Court of the I Additional District & Sessions Court at Karimnagar.

Between:

Akkamalla Venkata Rajaiah, S/o Hanmaiah, aged 69 years, Occ . Agriculture. R/o Nagunoor Village, Karrmnagar Mandal, Karimnagar District.

...APPELLANT/ Defendant in both

AND

Yegge Mallesham, S/o Ramulu, aged 69 years, Occ . Business, R/o H.No. 16-2- 751lC141N106, Tirumala Hills, Asmangadh, Malakpet, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENT/ Plaintiff in both

lA NO: 2 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Appellant / Petitioner herein to withdraw the Appeal Suit i.e. A.S No:

384 ol 2025 pending on the file of this Hon'ble Court.

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the execution of the lmpugned Judgement and Decree dated. 10-04-2025 in O.S. No. 37 of 2021 on the file of I Additional District & Sessions Court, at Karimnagar.

I

I

I

I

I

t

I

I

i

I

:

i

I

!

i

,

I

I

i

I

i

I

Ii

i

t

i

I

I

i

I

I

I

i

i

I

I

I

!

I

I

I

:

Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. B. Arjun Rao, REpRESEf I 'lNG

SRI I. SHARATH KUMAR

Counsel for the Respondent: NONE APPEARED

The Court delivered the following Judgment:

==G4V

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

AND

THE HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.2 of 2025

inland

APPEAL SUIT No.384 of 2025

JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Sri Jusnce K.Lokshman)

i

I.A.No.2 of 2025 is filed by the petitioner/appellant seeking permission to withdraw the appeal suit i.e., A.S.No.384 of 2025.

2. Mr.B.Arjun Rao, learned counsel representing Mr. I.Sharath Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant, on instructions, would submit that during the pendency of the present appeal both the appellant and respondent have settled the dispute outside the Court. The said facts were specifically mentioned in paragraph Nos.5 and 6 of the affidavit. Therefore, the petitioner/appellant has filed the present application seeking permission to withdraw the appeal t li

3.

Permission is accorded.

2

E-##

4. Accordingly, l.A.No.2 of 2025 is r rdered and A.S.No.384 of 2025 is dismissed as withdrawn. I here shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous applications pending, if anl , shall stand closed.

SD/- N.SRIHARI

T EPUTY REGISTRAR

ri

To,

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

1. The I Additional District & Sessions court at Karimn rgar.. ( with records)

2. One CC to SRl. l. SHARATH KUMAR, Advocate [Ot' ,C]

3. Two CD Copies

KUL/PSt,

+

\

I

I

i

!

I

I

I

HIGH COURT

DATED:3'l/10/202s

\

--- =-:1'

t,

!.t t!.[, ffi