Telangana High Court
CRLP/2198/2024 of Kukunuru Akshay Kumar Vs The State of Telangana on 29 October 2025
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TIWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL P NO: 2198 OF 2024 Between: 1. Kukunuru Akshay Kumar, S/o. K. Balu R/o. Near by Vijaya Garden, Bandlaguda AND 1 Age 23
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TIWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI
CRIMINAL P
NO: 2198 OF 2024
Between:
1. Kukunuru Akshay Kumar, S/o. K. Balu
R/o. Near by Vijaya Garden, Bandlaguda
AND
Age 23 years,Occ. Fabrication work
, Nagole, R.R. District
2. Chettipalli Siva Kumar, S/o. Ch. Venkatesh Age. 23 years Occ. Fabrication Work'R/o. H.No. 2-1-54, Near Ramalayam Temple Nagole, Ranga Reddy District
..PETITIONERS/A2 & A3
The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of r e I a n g a n a, H yd e ra b a d r h ro u s h P s B e g u mpet *B.d ftBe;f,ir?fl o *, *t N AN r R.Jayashankar,, age not known Sub-lnspector of Police P.S. Begumpet, Secunderabad
..... RESPO N DENT/DEFACTO /COMPLAI NANT
P"etition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the FIR in Crime No. 63 of 2024 registered by P.S.
Begumpet, Secunderabad against petitioners/A2 &A3 for the offences punishable U/s. 370, 370(A) of IPC and 3, 4 & 5 of Prevention of lmmoral Trafficking Act-
1956.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri L Harish ,Advocate for the Petitioners and the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent lrfo.1 and of None Appeared for the Respondent No. 2
The Court made the following: ORDER
\
THE I]|ONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI
CRIMINAL PETITION No.2198 of 2024
ORD,ER:
\\'hen the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that during the pendency of the crinrinal petition to quash the crime, charge sheet has been tlled an,J hence, the matter has become infructuous R:cording the aforesaid submission, this criminal petition is dispc,sed of' as infructuous. However, liberty is granted to petition:r(s) to challenge the charge sheet, if desires so Pt:nding miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPYII
SD/- T VIJAY KUMAR
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
N OFFICER
To,
1. The Xl Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate, secunderabad.
2' The Station House officer, e€jqu;pei,_Fa#dtiJi a"gr*pet, secunderabad
3. One CC to SRt L.HARISH'Ad7oiii" fOpUCi -'urrv'lr
4. Two ccs to f)ubric prosecut,o., ni!r, borrt irir the state of rerangana at _ tlVoqgbad ['JUT
5. Two CD Coiies '
VM
I
{
HIGH COURT
DATED: 29t10ta0?s
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
GRLP.No.219{l ot 2024 t- :-l rj (l
6 r B ZtlZ6 i + DISMISSING]'HE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS @ a