CRLP/15532/2024 of G.V.Saaketh Vs The State of Telangana on 16 October 2025

COMMON ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNS by the petitioner/accused to quash the proceeding against him in Crime No.233 of 2024 on the file of Mahankali Police Station Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376 (2) (n),420,506 lPc.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.1 and 2 ot 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences.

3. Vide order dated 06.10.2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identificalion and to submit a report.

Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal in/and

-

- /'- Services Committee, has identified the parties anrl submitted a report, dated 13.10.2025 and the same is placed cn record

5. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2075 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allorved and the proceedings against the petitioner/accused Crime \o.233 of 2024 on the file of Mahankali Police Station Hyderabac, registered for the offences punishable under Section 376 (2) (n) .120 506 lPC, are herebY quashed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending shall stand closed SDrt' .I]. PONNA KRISHNA ;ISTANT REGISTRAR. -- { a To, //TRUE COPY' SECTION OFFICER \ the Xlth Addrtronal Chief lVetropolitan t\,4agistrate at 36;Lrnderabad' The Station House Offrcer t\Iahankali Police Station, 111'derabad' Two CCs to the Publrc Prosecutor. High Court for the st:te of Telangana, at* Hyderabad [OUT] One CC to Srr A Prabhakar Rao. Advocate [OPUC] rlne CC to Sri lvledikonda Kondala Rao, Advocate [OPIJC] -two CD CoPies (-\long $ ith a copl ol loinl \lcmo) llh ,,-1

5. \5,s4

- HIGH COURT DAT'ED:1 611012025

COMMON ORDER

LA Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 ln/and CRLP.No.15532 of 2024 oR llE S14

;t rA ( oo rot, m6 n (1\ C

* ot trrr rr rrEO 6,\rrf ALLOWING THE I.A NOS.1 AND 2 OF 2025 AND CRIMINAL PETITION { \\ \1 1\

IN THE TIIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT TTYDERABAD Crl.P.No. 15532 of2024 Befween: Krishnagiri Varsha D/o.K.Anil Kumar, Aged about 22 years, occ: Softrvare Engineer, R /o.Parsigutta Main Road, Hyderabad. ..Petitioner / Respondent And G. V. Saaketh S/o.G. V. Shesha Srin ivasa Charyulu Aged about 24 years. occ: Business, R/o.H.No.6-8-32l2. Bhrahmana Wada Near Amrutha Theatre. Hanumakonda, Hanumakondadistrict. ....Respondent/Petitioner/Accused The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of for the State of Telangana, At Hyderabad. Respondent JOINT MEMO It is submitted that on the intervention of the well wishers friends and relatives and caste elders the disputes belween them were amicably sorted out. The elders advise the petitioner/ respondent not to prosecute the criminal case registered against the ltespondent/ petitioner/ Accused and for betterment of the Accused and R2 individual life as the petitioner /accused afld the rvell wishers settle the disputes amicable betlveen the respondent/Accused and they are for the befferment of their relationship. The petitioner have no interest to prosecute the above Criminal case against the petitioner/rcspondent/Accused. The said crimiral proceedings may be quashed in the interest of justice in Crl.

q P.No. 15532 o12024 and cannot be claim anlthing asainst the petitioner and future . The defacto complainant/ accordinglri the petitioner/R2 is agreed not to prosecute the criminal casc registered against Respondent/Petitioner/Accuse Under Sections 376( l) (n), 420, 506 IPC. as they are settled amicabty as the both side community elders are settled the matter with both of them. It is submitted that the petitioner/2'd resportcient have amicably settled the dispute at the intervention o I elders a rtl well wishers and friends and caste elders the matter has been comprontised between them. Hence the both parties came to compromise in lr,r above Crl.P.No. 15532 of 2024 aganst Crime No. No.233 o(' -024 on the file of Mahankali Police Station Hyderabad registered ar ainst the respondent /Accused Under Sections ll6Q) (n), 420, 506 IPL' and both the parties have no claims or rights against each other in fuLtl: and the accused and respondent are lived their individual lile and t o ;rttthorilv to each o them. \ ' t l-' ,.- / f/"'ituil, \l:1'' G.V.Saaketh Respondent/Petitioner/Accused lfo RespondenVPetitioner/Accused K.Vaisha Petitioncr' R espondent No. 2 Defacto complainant I lor Counse Petition Defacto ondent No. 2 inant c ompl