Telangana High Court
CRLRC/179/2025 of Venkat Rao Patil Vs State of Telangana on 14 October 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 179 OF 2025 Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 438 & 442 of BNSS against the
+[ 32s7 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 179 OF 2025
Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 438 & 442 of BNSS against the Judgment dated 31.07.2024 and 24.12.2024 made in C.C.No.127 of 2024 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class Narayankhed, Sangareddy District.
Between:
Venkat Rao Patil, sio Late Puq{alik Rao, aged about 70 years, occ. District Jt9.gg Rld,.R1o Flat No.p_-!01, PBR Estates, H.No.1-8-02t3t18, padma Cotony, Nallakunta, Hyderabad-500044.
... Revision Petitioner
AND
Counselfor the Petitioner:M/S. MAMIDI VENU MADHAV
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 : SRI S R DESHMUKH
The Court made the following: ORDER
s.tate of relangana, through s H o , Kangti, P.s., rep. by its Public prosecutor High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad.
,., Rss ps n d.e nUDe-taetp Q qm p lainant_
2. Jadhav Panthulu Nay?-k, S/q Dhupa, qged about 60 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Bheemra village, Kandi l/andal, S-ngareddy District
3. Rathod Kishan, S/o Tulsiram, agqd about 45 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Bheemra village, Kandi fVlandal, Sangareddy District
...Respondents/Accused
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.179 ot 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When ihe matter has been taken up for hearing, during the course of submissions, learned counsel for tl're petitioner sought perniission of this Court to withdraw tirrs Criminal Revision Car;e with a liberty to file a fresh case before appropriate fc,rum Recording the aforesaid submission, permission is accorded Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dis;missed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioner to file a rresh case before appropriate forum As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applicatiors, if any, shall stand closed "1?iltV'#[i!',HtE /
,TTRUE COPY'/ SECTION OFFICER To,
.. ---i.!-^..r c-..,areddvDiStriCt The Judicial i\Iagistrate of First Class l\ar ayar r^r'Ev eqr rYe' - - -'l . ,i,"r. ;" I ':-'er l'."'Fd :1 . " -Y -k a B I tI r T
2. One CC to SRI MAMIDI VENU NIADHAV, Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to SRI S R DESHIVIUKH, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor. High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (OUT)
5. Two CD Copies ADI(PSL w
HIGH COIJRT DATED i1411012025
ORDER
CRLRC.No.179 of 2025
1. * J 4 ll;:u iilfr .a* DISMISSING THE CRLRC AS WITHDRAWN .d4 I \q-__ rrt-t' i:t', !...1.\