Telangana High Court
AS/143/2021 of Siddala Yadamma Vs Mutyala Gopal Reddy on 14 October 2025
TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN ANO THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Appeal under Section 96 of C.P.C. aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree daled 07-04-2021 passed in O.S.No.517 of 2013 on the file of
[ 34s4 ]
TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
ANO
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
Appeal under Section 96 of C.P.C. aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree daled 07-04-2021 passed in O.S.No.517 of 2013 on the file of the Coud of the Special Sessions Judge for Trial of Cases under SC/ST (POA) Act-cum-Vll Additional District Judge at L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District.
Between:
Siddala Yadamma, Wo S. Narsimha, Age: 58 years, Occ: House Wife, R/o Ivlucharla (V), Kandukur (M), Ranga Reddy District
...Appellanfl Plai ntiffs
Mutyala Gopal Reddy, S/o M. Anantha Reddy, Age: 57 years, Occ. Business,
M. Nirmala, Wo Mutyala Gopal Reddy, Age: 48 years, Occ. Business,
M. Swetha, D/o Mutyala Gopal Reddy, Age:27 years, Occ: Business,
M. Ashiwini, D/o Mutyala Gopal Reddy, Age. 24 years, Occ: Business,
M. Chandana, D/o Mutyala Gopal Reddy, Age. 24 years, Occ: Business, All are permanent R/o H. No. 8-9-285/438, Devi Colony, Bidar Karnataka,
And
Presently residing at flat No. 201, Tirumdla Apartments, Near Secretariat Colony, Puppalguda, Rajendra Nagar (M), R.R. District-T.S.
... Respon dents/Defenda nts
Petition under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 R/w Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent/defendants not to alienate the agriculture land in survey No.205 admeasuring Ac.3-07 Gts, Sy No.206
admeasuring Ac.1-07 Gts, Sy No. 202 admeasuring Ac.1-25 Gts, Sy. No.206/A
admeasuring Ac,8-30 Gts, Sy No.207 admeasuring Ac.4-O2 Gts, Sy No 208
admeasuring Ac.3-04 Gts, Sy No.208/A admeasuring Ac.1-22 Gts, Sy No.209
admeasuring Ac.3-21 Gts, Sy No.210 admeasuring Ac.1-21 Gts and Sy No.210
admeasuring Ac.6-30 Gts, total admeasuring Ac.35-09 Gts, situated at Vemula Village, Midgil Mandal, Mahabubnagar District presently Rangareddy Dist pending disposal of the appeal.
AND
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
APPEAL SUIT NO: 143 OF 2021
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Counsel for the Appetlant: Mr. M. Vijaya Kumar Goud Counsel for the Respondents: None Appeared The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
'I'HIi HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
ANI)
TIIE IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
APPUAI. SIiIT No.143 of 2021
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
(Per Hon ble Sri,htsri<e K.l.o*shnmn) Mr.M.Vijay Kurnar Goud, Ieamed counsel for the appellant, seeks pennission ol' this Courl to withdraw the prescnt Appeal Suit. He had fited a memo vitle U.S.R.No.UJ9l84. datcd 07.10.202-5 beforc the Registry to that ef1'ect.
2. Pelnrission is accclrded.
3. Accordingly, this Appeal Suit is dismissed as Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shalI stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. A.V.S.PRASAD DEPUW REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER G 'o' , ,n" Special Sessions Judge for Tnal "J c:::t^^'31i:N,:I Soo' Act-cum- Vil Additionat oistriciluJgE at L.B Nagar, Ranga Reddv District
z. o."'ct't" rtat. rt'r vli'v""iumar Goud.' Advocate [OPUC] 3, Two CD CoPies Kam/PSLw withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
HIGH COURT DATED:1 411012025
JUDGMENT
AS.No.143 ot 2021 APPEAL SUIT IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN a*fl4 iE c ,).) 1 5 tl0\ M <;t ).. * h- t -r- Dr+r: