WP/6635/2024 of Meka Mallamma Vs The State of Telangana on 7 October 2025

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

WRIT PETITION NO: 6635 OF 2024

Between:

lVleka lrilallamma, W/o late Linga Reddy, Aged about 80 years, Occ House Wife, R/o Bodamarla Gadda, Gujja Post, Narayanpur I\,4andal, Yadadri- Bhongiri District.

PETITIONER

AND

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat, Hyderabad.

The District Collector, Yadadri- Bhongiri District.

The Revenue Divisionat Officer, Choutuppal Division, Yadadri- Bhongiri Distnct.

The Tahsildar, Narayanpur N,4andal, Yadadri- Bhongirt District.

The Statron House Officer, Narayanpur Police Station, Yadadri- Bhongiri District.

Meka Kavitha, W/o Late tt/ohan Reddy, Aged about 48 years, Occ Home I\,4aker. R/o H. no. 4- 9- 774, Road No. 10A, Plot No 18, Yellareddy Colony.

Hayathnagar. R. R. Distnct.

..RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutron of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of l\,4andamus by declaring inaction of the Respondent No. 3 in considering the representation of the Petitioner Dt '1 1- 11- 2023 to cancel the Glft Settlement Deed Doc No. 479/2007, Dt 08- 01- 2007 executed by me in favour of Late N/ohan Reddy i. e. , husband of the Respondent No. 6, further cancel the patta in favour of the Respondent No. 6 in respect of the land to an extent of Ac. 3- 38gts in Sy No. 78/6 and Ac. 1- 27gts in Sy No. 79, totaling Ac. 5- 25gts situated at

Gulja Village, Narayanapuram (Samastan Narayanpur) It4andal Yadadri- Bhongiri District, rLnder Chapter- V, clause 23 of Mainten rnce and welfare of Parents and Senior Citjzens Act, 2007, is illegal, arbitrary a nJ violatior of Articles 14, 15.21 and 300(A) of constitution of lndia and also vio a ion of natural lustice and consequently direct the Respondent No. 3 to cancel i-atta in fa vour of the Respondent No 6 in respect of the land to an extenl of i\r. 3- 38gt:; in Sy No.

7816 and Ac. 1- ,27gts in Sy No. 79, totaling Ac. 5- 259:s, situate d at Gulla Village. Nar;yan..ptrram lSamastan Narayanpur) L4ar^d: . Yadadr - Bhong ri District.

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in th€ circumstances stated in the affidavrt frled in support of the petition, the High Ccu 1 may be pleased to direct the Respon(ient No. 2 to 4 to cancel patta in favour-:i the Respondent No.

6 in respect of lhe land to an extent of Ac. 3-38gts in Sy No 7816 and Ac. '1-279ts rn Sy No 79, totaling Ac. 5-259ts, sitLr€ tcd at Gu;ja Village.

Narayanapuram (Samastan Narayanpur) l\,4andal, YacleC'l- Bhongiri District.

under Chapter- V, clause 23 of lVaintenance and welfare o. Parents and Senior Citizens Act. 200'/ and rectify the revenue records by erlering the Petitioners name thereby del€ te the name of the Respondent No. 6.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUI:

Counsel for the Respondent No.5: GP FOR HOME

Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI G.DAMODAR REDDY

The Court made the following: ORDER

*w

l.-

TIIE HON'BLE SRI JUS'TICE K. LAKSHMAN

WRI'I'PETITION No.6635 of 2024

ORAL OII.DER:

This Writ Petition is tilcd sceking a clircction to rcspondent No.i to considet' the application dated I I I 1.2023

submitted by the petitioner, rrother-in-law of lespoudertt No.6.

sceking carrccllation of lcgistcred gift settlement tlccd bcaring [)ocunrcut No.479 of 2007, datcd 0t1.01.2007.

2.

[-earnecl counsel appealing Ibr the petitioner and responclcut No.(r and leaniccl Assistant Govertintcttt Plcadcr fbr Wonren artd Child Wellhre, on insh'uctions. rvoulcl subntit that resl.ronclcut No.3 has ah'cady consider-ed thc said application and disposed of the same vldc orclel dated 04.07.2024 and respondent No.(r has filed a writ petition lirlc W.P.No.6ti4 ol'2025 challenging the said order

3.

tn thc liglrt of the same, nothing remains in the prcscnt wrrt petltlon to adjudicate hrrll.rer and it has beconre infructttous.

1.

Accolilingly, Llris Writ Pctition

ts

disrrisscd as

inli'uctuoLrs

\'lir;ccllarrcous applicatiorrs. il- an1, pon,.{in!r. sliail stand closcd.'l'lrcr.c shall lrc ntr orrlcr'as lo costs ,TRUE COPY//

sD/i rvl. osMAN ALI B4!(L

I\SSISTANT REq&TRAR

\

--

.

SECTION OFFICER

To,

One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Advocate [OPUC

One CC to SRI G.DAIVODAR REDDY, Advocate tOPl t l Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the litate of Telangana at Hyderabad IOUTI

Two CCs kr GP FOR HOltlE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

Two CD Copies

W.

BSR

TKS

HIGH COURT

DATED:0711012025