Telangana High Court
WP/30339/2025 of M/s Vision Resorts Vs The State of Telangana on 7 October 2025
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original J urisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.I.AKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 30339 AE 2025. Between: AND 1. 2. 3. 4. lVl/s Vision Resorts, a partnership firm having lts
t
./
[31681'
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original J urisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.I.AKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 30339 AE 2025.
Between:
AND
1.
2.
3.
4.
lVl/s Vision Resorts, a partnership firm having lts registered office.at 5-9- COfitliiiiP.,, Ciouni Fl6or, Bashderbagh, HyderabaQ,-[QP...by is Authorized Signatory tekkala Purushotham Naidu s/o padmanabha Naidu !9e{about 57
y"irr, r/o ptot No. 275T0270 Narsingi Heights, Rajendranagar, R.R.District.
...PETITIONER
The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat, Hyderabad.
The Additional Collector (Rev), R.R.District.
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendranagar Divisioh, R.R.District.
The Tahsildar, Shamshabad fVlandal R. R. District.
...RESPONDENTS
petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of tt/andamus, to dectare the action of the respondent No. 2
herein in rejecting the application bearing No. 2400008289 submitted by the petitioner for issuance of the Pattadar Pass Book and Title Degd in respect of the land admeasuring ac.20.17 gts., in Sy.No. 153 situated at Sulthanapally village, Shamshabad Mandal, R.R.District, without assigning any reason, aS being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the same, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Honble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 herein to re- consider the application No.
RC2400008289 and issue the Pattadar Pass Book and Title Deed in respect of the land admeasuring ac. 20.17 gts., in Sy.No. 153 situated at Sulthanapally village, Shamshabad Mandal, R.R.District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.LAYEEQ KHAN
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
-r-i
THE HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.30339 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.
2. Petitioner herein is claiming that it is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Acs.20.17 guntas in Sy.No.154, situated at Sultanpally Village, Shamshabad Mandal (Chevella 'Mandal), Rangareddy District, on the strength of registered sale deed bearing Document No.3951 of 2006, dated 20.03.2006. Respondent No.2 has issued memo dated 21.06J993 to the vendors of the petitioner stating that the subject property is a Government Land. Challenging the said memo, petitioner's vendors filed a writ petition i.e., W.P.No.14038 of 2005. Vide order dated 05.06.2009, this Court allowed the said writ petition and set aside the memo dated 2L.06.1993. Challenging the said order, State has preferred an appeal vtde W.A.No.1875 of 2013. The same was also dismissed on 26.09.2023. Therefore, petitioner has submitted an online application bearing No.2400008289, dated 25.09.2024 to respondent No.2 with a request to mutate its name and issue e-pattadar passbook. The same was rejected with one word 'rejected'. challenging the said rejection order, petitioner filed the present writ petition.
3. Leanted Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit that State has preferred slp challenging the Judgment dated 26.09.2023 in w.A.No.l875 of 201 3 passed by the Division Bench of this Court.
4. According to him, the said SLP is at diary number stage and it was not even numbered. However, respondent No.2 has rejected the said online application submitted by the peti_tioner seeking mutation of its name and issuance of .e-pattadar passbook with single word 'rejected'.
5. Perusal of the said rejection order would reveals that I respondent No.2 has rejected the request made by the \ \
petitioner without assigning any reasons in the impugned order. It thus amounts to non-application of mind.
6. Without going into the merits or demerits of the case, only on the said ground, the impugned rejection order of respondent No.2 is hereby set aside and the matter is remanded back to respondent No.2 to consider .the online application bearing No.2400008289, dated 25.09.2024, submitted by the petitioner seeking mutation of its name and for issuance of e- pattadar passbook in respect of the subject property, afresh and dispose of the same in accordance with [aw, by putting the petitioner and all interested parties on notice and affording them an opportunity. For any reason, respondent No.2 is not inclined to accept the request made by the petitioner, he shall assign specific reasons, pass a reasoned order and communicate copy of the same to the petitioner. However, he shall complete the said exercise within sixty (60) days frorn the date of receipt of a copy of this order. \ \
7. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. I il :j ri I I Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs: SD/. G.JYOTHI AS REG //TRUE COPYII / To, ON OFFICER
1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department of Telangana. , Hyderabad, State
2. The Additional Collector (Rev), R.R.District.
3. The Revenue Divisionar officer, Rajendranagar Division, R.R.District.
4. The Tahsitdar, Shamshabad Mandal R. R. District.
5. One CC to SRI tV.LAyEEe KHAN, Advocate tOpUCl 6' Iffi":r?:"1?ff,r,to* REVENUE, Hish court for rhe state or reransana at
7. Two CD Copies PMK TKS wq,
\ HIGH COURT DATEDi 0711012025
ORDER
WP.No.30339 of 2025 ,/) ,) t. (i t 20tIb z{m 1' t * ...<. 'rl DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS I I . tot rrl>{