Telangana High Court

WP/7398/2024 of Bommineni Vineela Vs The State of Telangana on 7 October 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 7398 OF 2024 Between: 1. Bommineni Vineela, W/o Sukhender Reddy, aged about 46 years,

[ 3168 r

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

WRIT PETITION NO: 7398 OF 2024

Between:

1. Bommineni Vineela, W/o Sukhender Reddy, aged about 46 years, Occ- Housewife, Rl/o H.No. 11-14-88 Old City, Kashibugga, Warangal

2. Yervua Venkat Reddy, S/o Masthan Reddy, Age 54 years, Occ- Business, R:/o H.No. 6-63, Reddypalem, Warangal.

3. Patnam Krishna Kishore, S/o Late Ratnam Satyam, aged about 40 years, Occ- Business, No 11-21-269, Kashibugga, Warangal-506002.

...PETITIONERS

AND

The State of Telangana, Ivlunicipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

The Commissioner, Survey Settlement and Land Records (CSSLR), State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

3. The Regional Director, Survey Settlement and Land Records, Warangal District

4. The Assistant Director, District Survey Settlement and Land Records Warangal District

5. The Kakathiya Urban Development Authorit Executive Officer, Office at KUDA Building, Hanmakonda, Warangal.

Warangal, rep. by Chief

UDA Road, Behind Ashok Hotel,

v,

K

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 2nd Respondent in not considering the request of the Petitioner vide letter dated 12/1212023 to appoint the officer other than the 4th respondent for conducting the survey of land admeasuring 1330 sq.yards falling in Sy.No.91 situated at Lakshmipuram, Kasibugga Warangal City, Warangal belonlling to the Petitioners purchased unoer registered sald deeds bearing Nos. 3087i2016, 3OBB/2016, 3089/2016 and 309Cr/2016 all datLd 11.03.2016 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of provisions of Survey Settlement and Land Records Act anrl violative of Article 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia.

Petition under St:ction 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nray be pleased to direct the Respondents 2 and 3 to conduct a resurvey by the office'other than the 4th respondent in terms of the order daled 1311212022 of this Hcnorable Court and locate the lands o' the Petitioner, Sth Respondent by fixing lhe boundaries while directing the stl- Respondent not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petltioners' land admeasuring 1330 sq.yards fallirg in Sy.No.9l situated at Lakshrnipuram, Kasibugga Warangal City, Warangal having purchased under registered sale deeds bearing Nos. 308712016, 30BB/2016, 3089/2016 and 3090/2016 all dated 1110312016.

Counsel for the Petitiorrer : SRI T.SURYA SATISH

Counsel for the Resp,or dents No.1to4: SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP' FOR REVENUE

Counsel for the Respon dents No.S :

The Court made the following: ORDER

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

HON'BI,E SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

WRIT PETITION No.7398 OF 2024

Heard leamed counsel for thc petitioners and Mr. L. Ravinder, leamed Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behall of respondent Nos. 1 to 4.

2. Petitioner Nos. I and 2 herein are claiming that they are the absolute owners and possessors ofopen plots admeasuring 400 square yards,530 square yards, both in Survey No.9l out of total extent of Acs.2.05 guntas, situated at Laxmipuram, Kashibugga, Warangal City, on the strength of registered sale deeds bearing document Nos.3089

and 3090 of2016, both dated 11.03.2016, respectively, whereas the father of petitioner No.3 had purchased open plots admeasuring 200

square yards each in the very same survey number under registered sale deeds bearing document Nos.3087 and 3088 of 2016, both dated 1 I .03.201 6. In proof of the same, they have filed copics of registercd sale deeds. They have filed a writ petition vitle lN.P. No.265 19 of 2022 to declare the action of respondent No.5 herein in claiming and interfering with the subject plots as illegal and fbr a consequcntial direction to respondent No.5 not to intcrfcre with the possession of the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER:

)

') KI,.J W P No 7.l9lt ofzolJ petitioners over the sub.iect plots without tbttowing due procedure laid down under lau'. Vide order dated 13.12.2022, l.A. No I of 2022 in the said writ petition, this Court directed respondent No..{ and the Tahsildar, Waranrlal City, to conduct survey in respect o1' the land adrncasuring I33(t squslg yards in Survey No.9l of l.akshmipuram, Kasibugga, Warangal District taking into consideration of registered sale deeds of the petitioners herein and shall complct.' thc survey within a period ol'Ibur (04) weeks from the date of receipt c,f copy of the said order lry issuing notice to the petitioners herein as well as respondent No.5 lrerein and shall submit a report beforc- this Court. According to the p etitioners, respondent No.4 conducted surrey along rvith the Tahsilclar. Warangal City on 25.02.2023. Feeling aggrieved by the said sur\/el, report, the petitioners preferred an app,:al under Section - l0 ol the Telangana survey and Boundaries Act, l9 23 before respondent No.2 on 12.12.2023. Despite receiving and acknowledging the said appeal, respondent No.2 is not disposing the said appeal in accordance rvith lrrrv. Aggrieved by the said inaction oi respondent No.2, the petitionels filed the present writ petition. i. Where,rs. leamed Assistant Govemment Ple;rder lor Revcnue. on instnrctions, would submit that the petitioners have to !'

KL..I w P. No.7198 of202J submit appeal by way of submitting an online application to respondent No.2 and he wilt dispose of the same in accordance with law. Considering the said survey report dated 25.02.2023, this Court disposed of the aforesaid writ petition. disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to prefer appeal by way ol online to respondent No.2 challenging the survey report dated 25.02.2023 within ten (10) days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, and on receipt of the said online appeal, respondent No.2 - Appellate Authority shall dispose of the same strictly in accordance with law within three (03) months thereafter. In the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed SD7-MOHD.ISMAIL DEPUW REGISTRAR e //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

The Principal Secretary, State of Telangana, tvlunicipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad- The Commissioner, Survey Settlement and Land Records (CSSLR), State of Telangana, Hyderabad. The Regional Director, Survey Settlement and Land Records, Warangal District The Assistant Director, District Survey Settlement and Land Records Warangal District The Chief Executive Officer, Kakathiya Urban Development Authority, Warangal, Office at KUDA Building, KUDA Road, Behind Ashok Hotel, Hanmakonda, Warangal. One CC to SRI T.SURYA SATISH, Advocate tOPUCl Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

4. In the light of the aforesaid submission, this writ petition is \I

l HIGH COURl' DATED:07l1Alit025 -i i1'j ()\1 €

/, _< 2 5 tt'i zqffi

ORDER

WP-No.7398 of 2024 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS Lol D.:^ rr, -..,.,.-'- --i:;i-:=-- - )4 .(. \ '( ;/ AD

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead